以下是引用freelance在2004-9-29 17:27:00的发言：Questions 8-9 That long-term cigarette smoking can lead to health problems including cancer and lung disease is a scientifically well-established fact. Contrary to what many people seem to believe, however, it is not necessary to deny this fact in order to reject the view that tobacco companies should be held either morally or legally responsible for the poor health of smokers. After all, excessive consumption of candy undeniably leads to such health problems as tooth decay, but no one seriously believes that candy eaters who get cavities should be able to sue candy manufacturers. 9. The reasoning in the argument is most vulnerable to criticism on the grounds that it (C) leaves undefined such critical qualifying terms as "excessive" and "long-term" (E) fails to address the striking differences in the nature of the threat to health posed by tooth decay on the one hand and cancer
我认为B
long-term与excessive是分别是 时间与数量的词
D中differences in the nature of the threat to health ，文章好象没有体现 the nature of the threat 的区别，也许有暗示，但明白地说 区别却没有的
请cranberrry 兄，讨论，呵呵，当然楼主公布答案还是更好 | 
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号
发表于 2004-9-29 18:11:00
