标题: og蓝色verbal+sc+53 [打印本页] 作者: buyifr 时间: 2014-7-13 16:51 标题: og蓝色verbal+sc+53 the normative model of strategic decision-making suggest that executives examine a firm's external environment and internal conditions, and in using the set of obective criteria they derive from these analyses, can decide on a strategy.
A conditions, and in using the set of obective criteria they derive from these analyses, can decide
B conditions, and they use the set of objective criteria derived from these analyses in deciding
C conditions and, in using the set of objective criteria derived from these analyses, deciding
D conditions and, using the set of objective criteria derived from these analyses, decide
E conditions and, in their use of the set of objective criteria they derive from these analyses, they decide
The key difference is what the executives should do. In B, they should examine X and use that information (in deciding on a strategy). In D, they should examine X and decide on a strategy (using that information). This is a very subtle difference, but an important one. The model wouldn't suggest that they examine something and then use that thing they've examined. We examine something IN ORDER TO decide on a strategy.作者: enkyklios 时间: 2014-7-13 23:11
有时过于关注语法上有没有错误，就难免忽略逻辑上的合理性。