ChaseDream

标题: 求助两道prep语法题！ [打印本页]

作者: kidsu1991 时间: 2013-10-8 09:40
标题: 求助两道prep语法题！

68. (28179-!-item-!-188;#058&003508)

For the best extraction of the flavor ofsaffron threads, it should be soaked in liquid after being pounded with a mortar and pestle.

(A) For the best extraction of the flavor ofsaffron threads, it should be soaked in liquid after being pounded

(B) To best extract their flavor, saffron threadsshould be soaked in liquid after pounding

(D) Thebest way to extract the flavor from saffron threads is to soak them in liquid after pounding them

(E) The flavor of saffron threads can best beextracted by soaking it in liquid after pounding it

ans: d
NN们能否解释一下b为什么错，我看语法笔记上看的云里雾里的。。。还有d的pounding them为什么修饰的是soak而不是saffron threads＝＝请原谅楼主的无知。。。

69. (28225-!-item-!-188;#058&003542)

The proliferation of so-called cybersquatters,people who register the Internet domain names of high-profile companies in hopes of reselling the rights to those names for a profit, led to passing the Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act in 1999, allowing companies toseek up to $100,000 in damages against those who register domain names with thesole intent of selling them later.

(A) passing the Anti-Cybersquatting ConsumerProtection Act in 1999, allowing companies to seek up to $100,000 in damagesagainst those who register domain names with the sole intent of selling

(B) the passage of the Anti-CybersquattingConsumer Protection Act in 1999, which allows companies to seek up to $100,000 in damages against those who register domain names with the sole intent thatthey will sell

(C) the passage in 1999 of the Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act, which allows companies to seek up to $100,000 in damages against those who registerdomain names with the sole intent of selling

(D) the Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer ProtectionAct, which was passed in 1999, and it allows companies to seek up to $100,000in damages against those who register domain names with the sole intent to sell

(E) the Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer ProtectionAct, passed in 1999 and allowing companies to seek up to $100,000 in damagesagainst those who register domain names with the sole intent of selling

ans: c

NN们能不能给翻译下这句话，请帮忙解释为什么选c不选d，谢谢诸位！

作者: renita12 时间: 2013-10-8 21:27
亲要说那不明白啊

作者: kidsu1991 时间: 2013-10-9 03:22

renita12 发表于 2013-10-8 21:27
亲要说那不明白啊

多谢提醒～～～已更改～～～

作者: kidsu1991 时间: 2013-10-9 03:48
自己顶一下～～

作者: kidsu1991 时间: 2013-10-9 10:10
自己再顶一下！！！！！！

作者: enkyklios 时间: 2013-10-9 15:26
-----------

作者: renita12 时间: 2013-10-9 15:43
B after后的pound应用被动，D的soke them them只能指代saffron threads
这题关键是理解saffron threads 与soke pound的关系，是被动

作者: chongyini 时间: 2013-10-9 20:54
抢占域名者的增多导致反域名抢注消费者保护法案通过，为防备那些注册域名只为将其卖掉的人这个法案允许公司获得100000元的损失赔偿。
某现象led to法案通过，法案允许..
D选项中it指代句子主语the proliferation，是不对的；应该是Act allow...
我觉得这种有同位语和非限定性定语的句子主要抓主谓，结构就很好懂了~

作者: kidsu1991 时间: 2013-10-10 05:14

chongyini 发表于 2013-10-9 20:54
抢占域名者的增多导致反域名抢注消费者保护法案通过，为防备那些注册域名只为将其卖掉的人这个法案允许公司 ...

谢谢chongyini，能不能讲一下为什么用intent of selling而不用intend to sell？

作者: kidsu1991 时间: 2013-10-10 05:21

renita12 发表于 2013-10-9 15:43
B after后的pound应用被动，D的soke them them只能指代saffron threads
这题关键是理解saffron threads ...

已明白～谢谢～

作者: chongyini 时间: 2013-10-10 08:06

kidsu1991 发表于 2013-10-10 05:14
谢谢chongyini，能不能讲一下为什么用intent of selling而不用intend to sell？

http://forum.chasedream.com/thread-239868-1-1.html
看这个帖子的二楼和四楼
我觉得吧，固定搭配记一些是有必要的，这里intent是名词，我认为表目的才用to do,此题不是所以表目的不需要to do ,of doing更好：
四楼这个句子表示目的：为了抢劫
个人意见啦，也不知道对不对~

作者: haiyueqinhui 时间: 2013-11-21 14:26
回答第二题
1. 不管Intend to do和intent of doing谁是表目的(我觉得两个都表目的)，但前面既然有了with: with the sole intent to sell，就应该用名词，表伴随。
2. D选项：The proliferation of so-called cybersquatters led to the Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act, which was passed。Pro导致了ACT,但导致了什么呢？废除？通过？提出？什么都没说，“, which was passed”这是non-essential从句可以被删掉了，但这个信息是必要的。
3. 关于it指代不清：众说纷纭，Ron有说过代词优先指代主语，但没说指代宾语不可以，所以把这个放在相对Inferior的位置上吧。

作者: ciciwenwen 时间: 2014-1-21 21:25
我的看法是：
1、intent of 是习语，杀掉B\D
2、已经有了一个passage这个名词形式，则杀掉passing。切忌自创complex型的gerund格式。杀掉A
3、E中逻辑不通顺，放进去后发现是：the proliferation .....led to the Act。应该是proliferation...led to the passage of Act.
杀掉E。剩下C.
需要注意的是：E中的passed in 1999 and allowing companies... 并不存在parallelism错误的问题，在GMAT中，过去分词和现在分词，形容词可以用and连接。

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)