ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 6698|回复: 6
打印 上一主题 下一主题

prep56

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2007-4-10 15:47:00 | 只看该作者

prep56

56. The proliferation of so-called cybersquatters, people who register the Internet domain names of high-profile companies in hopes of reselling the rights to those names for a profit, led to passing the Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act in 1999, allowing companies to seed up to $100000 in damages against those who register domain names with the sole intent of selling them later.

A  passing the Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act in 1999, allowing companies to seed up to $100000 in damages against those who register domain names with the sole intent of selling them later.

B the passage of the Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act in 1999, which allows companies to seed up to $100000 in damages against those who register domain names with the sole intent that they will sell

C the passage in 1999 of the Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act, which allows companies to seed up to $100000 in damages against those who register domain names with the sole intent of selling

D the Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act, which was passed in 1999, and it allows companies to seek up to $100000 in damages against those who register domain names with the sole intent to sell

E the Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act, passed in 1999, and it allows companies to seek up to $100000 in damages against those who register domain names with the sole intent of selling

 

A: passing应该改成passage,这里强调结果不是过程

B: in 1999有修饰歧义,按原文应该是passagethey指代有歧义,应该指names,同时要用被动时态

C: correct

D: it指代歧义,应该是Act

E: 同上

注意:

1、分词和名词的区别,一般都是考用到名词的

2in 1999 时间状语的位置改变会有修饰歧义

3intent of selling的用法

intent of selling的用法”是个什么用法?prep前面有好几道题都是很明确的of doing错,我就把当当成ets的一个错误点了,它就马上给我来一个对的。

我快被prep搞疯了,觉得自己好像前面的sc都白复习了:(

沙发
发表于 2007-4-10 16:05:00 | 只看该作者
我脑袋里面都没有of doing 这个正确还是绝对错误的概念
MM别着急呀

送你一点来自800分的TONY的语法总结里面的of doing的总结


    


    

1.           
the cost to sb of doing sth; cost sb
sth in sth; sth cost sb some money


    

2.           
be necessary to do/the necessity of
doing/sth


    

3.           
be capable of doing sth/the
capability of doing sth/be able to do sth/the ability to do sth/the possibility
of doning
. [be capable of being done/be
able/unable to be done
] are wrong


    

4.           
with the intention of doing

5.     aim
at/to do (aim
为名词时,不与to搭配,with the aim of doing something)


    

6.           
the chance of doing


    

7.           
diminish[不能用impede] the
possibility of doing sth


    


    

8.           
at a cost of doing


呈阅



    



    



    



    



    



    


    


板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2007-4-10 16:11:00 | 只看该作者

恩,果然太鲁莽下结论了。

老实说,tonyNN的总结我手头也有一份,但是没有ls的这么熟悉,惭愧,白看了:(

地板
发表于 2008-7-2 11:40:00 | 只看该作者

关于intent的用法 有点晕了

根据语法笔记的解释: of doing修饰名词而to do修饰动词表目的

但是查了longman里面intent的解释

n.[law] the intention to do something illegal
with intent (to do something)
例句: He is charged with possession of a gun with intent to commit a robbery.

这个例句和D选项的"those who register domain names with the sole intent to sell"有什么不同吗?

还望大家拍醒我,先谢过啦!



[此贴子已经被作者于2008-7-2 11:44:29编辑过]
5#
发表于 2012-5-5 15:49:14 | 只看该作者
intent of doing 是对的, 此处intent是名词,用of doing 修饰它。DE 错在导致的是法案的通过,而不是导致法案。A 错在allowing 修饰有歧义,B错在 they will sell 中 they 指代不清,既可以指companies 也可以指 cybersquatters。

愚见~~
6#
发表于 2012-5-5 15:50:56 | 只看该作者
CC
7#
发表于 2013-6-23 17:28:04 | 只看该作者
这题我在国外论坛研究了一下,首先发现我们的e选项和他们的不一样。
其次,原文的意思应该是 the passage allows companies...
c 中which 指代的应是passage.
关于which的这个用法RON强调:
the rule [noun + preposition + object,which] in which 'which' refers to noun and not to object in most cases is wrong.
[noun + preposition + object,which] is the secondary interpretation, only to be used if ALL of the choices contain a nonsense primary interpretation (the noun next to the modifier).
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-1 13:36
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部