151. If Dr. Wade was right, any apparent connection of the eating of highly processed foods and excelling at sports is purely coincidental.
(A) If Dr. Wade was right, any apparent connection of the eating of
(B) Should Dr. Wade be right, any apparent connection of eating
(C) If Dr. Wade is right, any connection that is apparent between eating of
(D) If Dr. Wade is right, any apparent connection between eating
(E) Should Dr. Wade have been right, any connection apparent between eating
我以前总结的if用法：
条件句：if+一般现在/过去时，主句现在/过去将来时。
假设句：if+ 一般现在/过去时， 主句（would)+谓语动词原形。
上面这个题目答案没啥问题，不过我对它的时态不明白，OG解释说要“一致”可是我觉得跟我以前总结的规律很不一样啊（也都是看OG解释总结的）
所以请教XDJM有没关于if时态的总结或者看看一般还什么别的时态没有？？不知道是不是我总结的if时态不对呢？？？？？
求助
有这种用法，if条件句一般现在时，主句也是一般现在时。
if虚拟语气，主句should/would+动词原型
if x happens, y will happen.
OK
了解！谢谢LEEON
BY THE WAY，“if条件句一般现在时，主句也是一般现在时”这种用法属于什么：：是假设还是条件呢？？有什么原则能区分这3种事态的用法么？？比如说只有前面if从句的时候怎么判断后面是什么时态呢？
继续请教中，谢谢
“if条件句一般现在时，主句也是一般现在时”这种用法属于什么：：是假设还是条件呢？
应该是条件句。比如说如果你说喝水能治感冒是对的，那么他今天感冒喝了很多水会好了。实际情况是说话的时候他感冒好不好、你说的对不对都不知道。
比如说只有前面if从句的时候怎么判断后面是什么时态呢？
这个具体情况具体对待。最关键是要理清题意，如果后面主句说你应该比现在如何，那么条件句应该是对现在的假设。因为现在的情况大家都知道。
OG中出现最多的应该是最后一种if x happens, y will happen.具体情况还是看OG例子最有说服力。
以上如有不当，请指正。
没有不当，非常清楚！！感谢leeon
其实抽象的说到底用那种if时态确实有点不太实际了。
对你第一个关于“应该是条件句。比如说如果你说喝水能治感冒是对的，那么他今天感冒喝了很多水会好了。实际情况是说话的时候他感冒好不好、你说的对不对都不知道。”
我是不是可以这么区分它跟if x happens, y will happen的关系：一个是已知“A发生，然后B发生的条件下指出：if A happens, B happens.”；而另外一个是在没有任何结论和前提下说“if x happens, y will happen”也就是说 ，后面这种情况就是一个想像。 是这样么？？
呵呵，觉得自己说的有点别扭好像
你的理解很正确。区别很细微，关键是意思上的区别。前后都用现在时说明两者都是客观存在的，但是事实怎么样我们都不知道。
if x happens, y will happen。说明了y不是客观存在的。所以条件X发生了，y就将发生。
给你~~~~~呵呵
LEEON
我也快考了，也在这里兜圈子，不过偶是问问题，你是回答问题，档次不同啊！！
呵呵，ANYWAY，一起加油！！！
But I don't think you need to stick on the paradigms... Just keep two basic principles in mind:
1. Keep the meanings consistent;
2. Never use any future tense in subordinate clauses.
But I don't think you need to stick on the paradigms... Just keep two basic principles in mind:
1. Keep the meanings consistent;
2. Never use any future tense in subordinate clauses.
I see what you mean about that, but the first one, in fact, is difficult to control .
If you can offer an example to describe how to distinguish between if x happens, y will happen and if x happens, y will happen , I will appreciate you a lot.
i want to know this too .
by the way ,i think the explanation of the og146 is contradictory to that of the og151.
the og146's the explanation said : Choice B incorrectly uses a future-tense verb (will be) in the if clause; the if clause must use the present tense if it is preceded, as here, by a result clause that uses a future-tense verb (e.g., will find).
I am confused now ,
OG的意思應該是說 if s+V (這裡要用現在式), S+V (這裡才能用will)
if it is preceded 表順序在前的句子吧
Why does not the sentence use the subjunctive mood of the verb will be?
If Dr．Wade is right，any apparent connection
between eating highly processed foods and excelling at sports
is purely coincidental．
问得好 答得也好 都是NN
| 欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) | Powered by Discuz! X3.3 |