ChaseDream

标题: OG13-SC106 A选项 - 主谓离得有点远？ [打印本页]

作者: waytous 时间: 2013-1-17 12:45
标题: OG13-SC106 A选项 - 主谓离得有点远？
107.Originally developed for detecting air pollutants, a
technique called proton-induced X-ray emission, which
can quickly analyze the chemical elements in almost
any substance without destroying it, is finding uses in
medicine, archaeology, and criminology.

(A)Originally developed for detecting air pollutants,
a technique called proton-induced X-ray
emission, which can quickly analyze the
chemical elements in almost any substance
without destroying it,

(B)Originally developed for detecting air pollutants,
having the ability to analyze the chemical
elements in almost any substance without
destroying it, a technique called proton-induced
X-ray emission

(C)A technique originally developed for detecting
air pollutants, called proton-induced X-ray
emission, which can quickly analyze the
chemical elements in almost any substance
without destroying it,

(D)A technique originally developed for detecting
air pollutants, called proton-induced X-ray
emission, which has the ability to analyze the
chemical elements in almost any substance
quickly and without destroying it,
(E) A technique that was originally developed for
detecting air pollutants and has the ability to
analyze the chemical elements in almost any
substance quickly and without destroying the
substance, called proton-induced X-ray emission,

虽说比较下来，我能够认可

作为正确答案。
但我还是有个小小的疑惑~
一般来说主谓之间隔着千山万水的，都会认为是错的，而这里加上了which引导的非限制性条件状语从句，就对了~
请问什么情况下，主谓不可以隔着千山万水，而什么时候又可以呢？

谢谢！

作者: 啃玉米的兔子 时间: 2013-1-17 12:56
"主谓之间隔着千山万水的，都会认为是错的" -->不太认同这个判断准则...

作者: DesmondWang 时间: 2013-1-17 13:25
同意LS啊。而且也没有隔千山万水吧，prep里还有更长的句子呢
这句话是因为，其他四个选项都有明显的错误;而A中主谓虽然离得远，但并不影响意思的理解，所以A is the best! 。

lz仔细看CDE和A 的区别，把technology和called。。。分开，是把原来的essential modifier变成了non-essential modifier，从意思上来说就错了。而B则是两个连续的modifier错误，这是以前几个斑竹讨论过的著名的夹心修饰的错误。

作者: stella要去英国 时间: 2013-3-3 22:35
我很好奇C为什么不对，A的which 怎么就不会修饰emissions了？

作者: 春野狐狸 时间: 2013-4-4 23:18
对这道题有疑问

作者: YangCyini 时间: 2013-5-5 10:44
求问什么叫夹心修饰？

作者: Healthy312 时间: 2013-5-12 13:26

, 哈哈....

作者: enkyklios 时间: 2013-5-12 15:48
说到底这还是跟跳跃修饰有关，什么情况下可以被分开来不会有歧义。

B的错误是什么呢

作者: zhangyunyao714 时间: 2013-5-20 15:47
THXXXXXXXXXX

作者: RobinSW 时间: 2013-5-20 21:08
A选项的主谓其实离得不远啊。
这句句子去掉修饰的话，其实就是 a technique is finding uses in medicine, archaeology, and criminology。
其中句首分词短语 Originally developed for detecting air pollutants修饰主语a technique。主语后面紧跟着的called proton-induced X-ray emission同样也是修饰主语。逗号+which 作为非限定性定语从句，其先行词是proton-induced X-ray emission。
B,D,E有明显的错误。
当时我在C和A之间纠结了一下。C的错误在于developed 和 called 之间需要加上and，是并列关系，否则的话两个分词短语之间的关系不清不楚。A将2个分词短语放在主语一前一后，表达清楚。

不认同的请指点啊，谢谢。

作者: weini3011 时间: 2013-5-22 20:15
1111111111111111111111111111111111

作者: zhuangzhilingy 时间: 2013-5-23 21:34
顶，ddddddddddd

作者: xuexue22cn 时间: 2013-8-12 20:45

作者: 木木和猫猫 时间: 2013-8-15 22:03
看解答~

作者: vengeance 时间: 2013-8-15 23:54
为什么讨论帖还要回复设置……………

作者: Faithy 时间: 2013-8-18 15:11
谢谢了楼主！

作者: florenceff 时间: 2013-8-24 22:35
求解答~~~

作者: Kimmie琪1992 时间: 2013-8-26 20:42
帮助很大！！谢谢！！

作者: ducky90 时间: 2013-9-1 19:40
ddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddd

作者: mandyfang 时间: 2013-9-3 16:13
THANKSSSSSSSS

作者: 甜甜罗抽抽 时间: 2013-9-3 23:11

RobinSW 发表于 2013-5-20 21:08
A选项的主谓其实离得不远啊。
这句句子去掉修饰的话，其实就是 a technique is finding uses in medicine, ...

解释的很好

作者: enkyklios 时间: 2013-9-4 00:28
顶---------

作者: hanxgo 时间: 2013-9-17 12:38
为什么这种帖子也要设置一个隐藏= =

作者: besoru 时间: 2013-9-22 22:12

RobinSW 发表于 2013-5-20 21:08
A选项的主谓其实离得不远啊。
这句句子去掉修饰的话，其实就是 a technique is finding uses in medicine, ...

逗号+which 作为非限定性定语从句，其先行词是proton-induced X-ray emission。

关于这点我存在疑虑，你可以看下C选项关于which的解释，OG的解释是:relative clause introduced by which incorrectly and illogically modifies emssion

作者: swedishmafia 时间: 2013-10-3 19:09
谢谢解释！！！！

作者: Ophena 时间: 2013-10-14 08:20
谢谢楼主分享

作者: SherlockedJohn 时间: 2013-10-19 14:22
同搞不懂1111111111111

作者: Indigolove 时间: 2013-10-21 15:02
Originally developed for directing air pollutants, a technique called proton-induced X-ray emission, which can quickly analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance without destorying it, is finding uses in medicine, archaelogy, and criminology.

(A) Originally developed for detecting air pollutants, a technique called proton-induced X-ray emission, which can quickly analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance without destroying it,
(B) Orignially developed for detecting air pollutants, having the ability to analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance without destroying it, a technique called proton-induced X-ray emission
(C) A technique originally developed for detecting air pollutants, called proton-induced X-ray emission, which can quickly analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance without destroying it,
(D) A technique originally developed for detecting air pollutants, called proton-induced X-ray emission, which has the ability to analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance quickly and without destroying it,
(E) A technique that was originally developed for detecting air pollutants and has the ability to analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance quickly and without destroying the substance, called proton-induced X-ray emission,

Solution:
First, this is the longest question I have ever met, so I will simplify a little bit. Here proton-induced X-ray emission is the subject.
A: "(opening modifier), (noun) (modified by necessary descriptive phrase)
B: "(opening modifier), (modifer), (noun) (modified by necessary descriptive phrase)
C: "(Noun), (modifier), (modifer), which"
D: "(Noun), (modifier), (modifer), which"
E: "(Noun), (modifier), (verb), (noun)

so we....only can go with A

作者: Joyce0830 时间: 2013-10-29 22:25
藏了什么·························

作者: Ambersnail 时间: 2013-11-8 11:35
怎么都没有解释which啊~~~

作者: jerryko 时间: 2013-12-18 21:46
这个答案是RON的吗？

作者: bobsaber 时间: 2014-2-26 14:38
。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。

作者: xp111 时间: 2014-2-27 08:17
a是正确的很明显吧。。。排除法

作者: wellingbe 时间: 2014-4-4 12:31
感谢楼主

作者: lulu614 时间: 2014-4-28 13:11
106. Originally developed for detecting air pollutants, a technique called proton-induced X-ray emission, which can quickly analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance without destroying it, is finding uses in medicine, archaeology, and criminology.

(A) Originally developed for detecting air pollutants, a technique called proton-induced X-ray emission, which can quickly analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance without destroying it,

(B) Originally developed for detecting air pollutants, having the ability to analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance without destroying it, a technique called proton-induced X-ray emission（修饰+修饰+主谓宾，错，曼哈顿语法）

(C) A technique originally developed for detecting air pollutants, called proton-induced X-ray emission, which can quickly analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance without destroying it,（called后面这个句子应该修饰technique而不是pollutants）

(D) A technique originally developed for detecting air pollutants, called proton-induced X-ray emission, which has the ability to analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance quickly and without destroying it, （called后面这个句子应该修饰technique而不是pollutants）

(E) A technique that was originally developed for detecting air pollutants and has the ability to analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance quickly and without destroying the substance, called proton-induced X-ray emission,（原句中有主句有从句，而这句话中将从句变成了主句的地位，用and进行连接，是改变了原文的逻辑含义，且called后面这个句子应该修饰technique而不是前面的substance，有歧义）

作者: hawk！！！ 时间: 2014-5-28 22:42
谢谢分享。。。。

作者: little1903 时间: 2014-7-2 21:24
多谢！！！！！！！！！！！！！！

作者: lizhuofan 时间: 2014-8-11 11:26
thanks for sharing

作者: AustinLuan 时间: 2014-8-12 10:56
赞！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！

作者: 少年时代balala 时间: 2014-8-22 08:08
对which修饰的部分有点疑惑。。

作者: kanzakiv 时间: 2014-8-23 05:40
多谢楼主

作者: frankieyy 时间: 2014-8-30 16:05
xxxxhhhhhhh

作者: 紫竹墨香 时间: 2014-9-4 17:57
顶~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

作者: zincgirl 时间: 2014-9-5 16:28
学习了抱拳

作者: yuyuxiao123 时间: 2014-9-6 08:13

作者: conglomerator 时间: 2014-9-18 22:40
的顶顶顶顶顶顶顶

作者: 笑小笑小蚂蚁 时间: 2014-9-23 20:17
llllllllllllllllllllllllll

作者: 笑小笑小蚂蚁 时间: 2014-9-23 20:20

RobinSW 发表于 2013-5-20 21:08
A选项的主谓其实离得不远啊。
这句句子去掉修饰的话，其实就是 a technique is finding uses in medicine, ...

..亲，OG上说的A选项：逗号+which 作为非限定性定语从句，其先行词是a technique。而C选项 which的先行词就是emission。。。。哎不懂啊

作者: jiangfeichen 时间: 2014-10-23 18:22
谢谢楼主！！！！

作者: 奔波在考G路上 时间: 2014-10-24 18:10
thx！！！！！！！！！！！！！！

作者: fatbunbun 时间: 2014-12-5 16:43
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

作者: monica.chan 时间: 2014-12-5 23:05
”。。。。。

作者: englishpear 时间: 2014-12-12 13:25
夹心修饰很形象啊

作者: phiyin 时间: 2014-12-15 11:16
看一下答案

作者: blackmelody369 时间: 2015-5-22 10:39
感谢分享！

作者: Stephanie渔 时间: 2015-5-24 17:49
顶楼主！

作者: 打翻的墨水瓶 时间: 2015-6-9 19:26
感谢分享！

作者: Highway21Exit 时间: 2015-6-10 10:26
感谢分享！

作者: Sikii 时间: 2015-9-22 16:44
感谢分享！

作者: wxt_357 时间: 2015-9-22 18:12
同疑惑，根据OG上的解释，为何同样都是“...emission, which..."结构，只有C选项“relative clause introduced
by which incorrectly and illogically modifies emission.” A选项就没有which修饰emission的嫌疑？

另外不太同意之前某楼的童鞋说的portion-induced X-ray emission是句子主语，它是作为called...开头的noun modifier的一个组成部分而存在，a technique应该才是句子主语&which所要修饰的先行词。

作者: 发动机 时间: 2015-9-24 17:17

stella要去英国发表于 2013-3-3 22:35
我很好奇C为什么不对，A的which 怎么就不会修饰emissions了？

同问，明明两个which都是跟在emission，后面的，不是应该就近修饰emission吗

作者: 发动机 时间: 2015-9-24 17:25
在别的帖子看到的，由erkuai9526提供，我从曼哈顿直接贴过来哈
The difference is in the placement of the various phrases.

A: "(opening modifier), (noun) (modified by necessary descriptive phrase), which" - in this structure, which refers to the noun. Note that the few words right after "technique" are simply the name of that technique. These words ("technique called proton-induced X-ray emission") collectively make up the extended noun phrase to which "which" refers. The single-word noun is technique but the other words are necessary to understand what technique we're talking about.

C: "(Noun) (modifier), (modifer), which" - in this structure, we've separated what had been the necessary descriptive phrase from the noun, so it is no longer a part of any extended noun phrase. As a result, the "which" in this case really does only apply to "emission" rather than to a "technique called emission" b/c "a technique called emission" as a simple noun phrase, is no longer part of the sentence.

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)