标题: 求助各位牛人，一道GWD!!! [打印本页] 作者: zxppx 时间: 2012-9-11 14:29 标题: 求助各位牛人，一道GWD!!! Most of Portugal’s 250,000 university students boycotted classes in a one-day strike to protest a law that requires them to contribute $330 a year toward the cost of higher education, previously paying $7 per year. A. year toward the cost of higher education, previously paying $7 per year B. year toward the cost of higher education, for which was previously paid $7 per year C. year, compared to the previously $7 per year, toward the cost of higher education（previously不应该修饰$7） D. year toward the cost of higher education, instead of the $7 per year required previously E. year as opposed to the $7 per year required previously for the cost of higher education 请问A和B为什么了错了。答案是D。我觉得B中which指代的是higher education，在定语从句中做主语，只不过是被动形式。作者: DUKB24 时间: 2012-9-11 14:53
notice the existence of FOR
it makes nonsense to say
for the cost of education was previouly paid
fragment作者: zxppx 时间: 2012-9-11 15:16
谢谢，还是不太明白！作者: baixuefei0524 时间: 2012-9-11 15:59
B中 WHICH无主语 可以搜索一下以前帖子作者: zxppx 时间: 2012-9-11 16:35
B中的主语不是higher education吗？我是这样理解的higher education was previously paid for $7 per year。作者: baixuefei0524 时间: 2012-9-11 16:51
介宾，介词+宾语。 for 是介词 后面的必然是宾语。 for which这里是 for higher education,还原后是was previously paid $7 per year for higher education，没有主语作者: zxppx 时间: 2012-9-11 17:09 作者: zxppx 时间: 2012-9-11 17:10
那如果去掉FOR， B就没问题了吧作者: stlibai 时间: 2012-9-11 17:14
我分析的没那么清楚,但是介词+名词这种介词短语结构里的名词是糟糕的先行词,所以可以用来选优作者: DUKB24 时间: 2012-9-11 17:14
yeap
i think it will be fine作者: stlibai 时间: 2012-9-11 17:14
那如果去掉FOR， B就没问题了吧
-- by 会员 zxppx (2012/9/11 17:10:47)
去掉for也不行的,因为已经有更合理的选项了.作者: baixuefei0524 时间: 2012-9-11 17:36
楼上说得很对，做语法不要管如何把错的改对了，这样会耗费大量时间。知道哪里错了就好作者: lcy0403 时间: 2012-10-24 05:15
year toward the cost of higher education, for which was previously paid $7 per year
7$ was paid per year for the cost of higher education
