462. Judge Lois Forer’s study asks why do some litigants have a preferred status over others in the use of a public resource, the courts, which in theory are available to all but in fact are unequally distributed among rich and poor.
(A) do some litigants have a preferred status over others in the use of a public resource, the courts, which in theory are available to all but in fact are unequally distributed among
(B) some litigants have a preferred status over others in the use of a public resource, the courts, which in theory are available to all but in fact are unequally distributed between
(C) do some litigants have a preferred status over another in the use of a public resource, the courts, in theory available to all but in fact are unequally distributed among
(D) some litigants have a preferred status to another in the use of a public resource, the courts, in theory available to all but in fact not equally distributed between（B）
(E) does one litigant have a preferred status over the other in the use of a public resource, the courts, in theory available to all but in fact they are not equally distributed among
1、the courts 是不是 a public resource 的同位语？
2、如果把D项中的status to another 改为status over others, 该项是否可以成为正确选项？
请NN们指导，谢谢！
the courts和a public resource不是同位关系，而是包容关系，后者包含前者。
D的改法只解决了一部分问题，但是后面的定从指代相比于形容词作定语指代要明确得多，尤其是指代对象十分确定，此外，unequally和not equally也可以作为一个原因。
谢谢。但我还是不清楚，the courts 如果不是同位语，那它在句子中充当什么句子成分呢？
另外，形容词作定语修饰the courts 我觉得指代还是比较清晰的，因为它不太可能是跳跃性修饰前一个名词。除非是A of B 结构，需要用逻辑意思来判断形容词作定语的中心词究竟是A 还是B。
sorry, litheliluo，我才仔细查阅‘同位语’的解释，这道题应该是指同位语，抱歉误导了；
形容词作定语的确可行，但是，就我个人总结的例子来看，基本上都是由动词转化来的形容词才这样用，比如：worried等，而其他的形容词一般都被定从所取代。
652. Since the movie was released seventeen UFOs have been sighted in the state, which is more than had been sighted in the past ten years together.
(A) which is more than had been sighted
(B) more than had been sighted
(C) more than they had sighted
(D) more than had reported sightings（B）
(E) which is more than had reported sightings
这道题似乎形容词短语作定语和非限制性定语从句具有同等的选择价值。我印象里的形容词短语用逗号隔开,修饰靠近它的名词这样的例子应该不少。我觉得它和定从应该不存在优先次序的说法。回到上面那题，我感觉同位语很少用非限制性定从来修饰，反而用形容词短语修饰的情况多一些，特别是同位语位于句末的时候。讨论。
652是主谓比较结构，我认为和形容词结构不太一样。
以前我的看法和你现在的看法比较一致，直到看了OG中有一道类似的题后才改变的，我记不得题号了，但是应该在前100题内，你可以再查查。
除非是A of B 结构，需要用逻辑意思来判断形容词作定语的中心词究竟是A 还是B。
litheliluo, 想请教一下：你的意思是不是说如果修饰A of B 这样的结构，要靠逻辑意思来判断修饰结构的修饰对象？就近修饰的原则不可行，并且也不一定是修饰A of B中的中心词？ 那这种同位语结构呢？后面的定从或者形容词短语是不是应该就近修饰？我以前一直以为优先修饰同位语修饰的对象，而不是同位语本身。
good point
这里的Prefer不是prefer to结构
preferred修饰status
| 欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) | Powered by Discuz! X3.3 |