ChaseDream

标题: 大全48题一点求教 [打印本页]

作者: ran2010zx    时间: 2011-9-8 11:38
标题: 大全48题一点求教
47    Accordingto some analysts, whatever its merits, the proposal to tax away allcapital gains on short-term investments would, if enacted, have a disastrouseffect on Wall Street trading and employment.
(A) its merits, the proposal to tax
(B) its merits may be, the proposal oftaxing
(C) its merits as a proposal, taxing
(D) the proposal’s merits, to taxA
(E) the proposal’s merits are, taxing
答案是A这个没问题,但是E为什么错呢?后面伴随状语也可以啊,那个ARE我觉得也对啊。。。
作者: CrackingGMAC    时间: 2011-9-8 13:32
A和E意思根本不一样。
A是说“the proposal...would have a disastrouseffect on Wall ”
而E是说“taxing away allcapital gains on short-term investments would have a disastrouseffect

hence A.
作者: fdrandom    时间: 2011-9-8 13:43
E:为什么要补are?merit做动词不是很好么
作者: ran2010zx    时间: 2011-9-9 07:54
E:为什么要补are?merit做动词不是很好么
-- by 会员 fdrandom (2011/9/8 13:43:04)


E中的MERITS是名词复数,不是动词
作者: ran2010zx    时间: 2011-9-9 07:55
A和E意思根本不一样。
A是说“the proposal...would have a disastrouseffect on Wall ”
而E是说“taxing away allcapital gains on short-term investments would have a disastrouseffect

hence A.
-- by 会员 CrackingGMAC (2011/9/8 13:32:35)

呵呵谢谢,不过E从语法角度来看也对是么?这个问题其实处在改变了原句意思?
作者: CrackingGMAC    时间: 2011-9-9 08:16
A和E意思根本不一样。
A是说“the proposal...would have a disastrouseffect on Wall ”
而E是说“taxing away allcapital gains on short-term investments would have a disastrouseffect

hence A.
-- by 会员 CrackingGMAC (2011/9/8 13:32:35)


呵呵谢谢,不过E从语法角度来看也对是么?这个问题其实处在改变了原句意思?
-- by 会员 ran2010zx (2011/9/9 7:55:11)


Well,seems that you've ignored the middle word "if enacted" , it is the "proposal" ,not "taxing..." be enacted, based on this point of view, you can eliminate choice C,D,E,in terms of choice B, i think" propose to "will be more idiomatic than "propose of doing" So, A wins.
just some sort of personal views.
let me know if you are still baffled.

作者: fdrandom    时间: 2011-9-9 10:14
优选动词而不是名词啊,E没必要这么改,意思也变了


E:为什么要补are?merit做动词不是很好么
-- by 会员 fdrandom (2011/9/8 13:43:04)



E中的MERITS是名词复数,不是动词
-- by 会员 ran2010zx (2011/9/9 7:54:14)


作者: ran2010zx    时间: 2011-9-14 08:47
A和E意思根本不一样。
A是说“the proposal...would have a disastrouseffect on Wall ”
而E是说“taxing away allcapital gains on short-term investments would have a disastrouseffect

hence A.
-- by 会员 CrackingGMAC (2011/9/8 13:32:35)



呵呵谢谢,不过E从语法角度来看也对是么?这个问题其实处在改变了原句意思?
-- by 会员 ran2010zx (2011/9/9 7:55:11)



Well,seems that you've ignored the middle word "if enacted" , it is the "proposal" ,not "taxing..." be enacted, based on this point of view, you can eliminate choice C,D,E,in terms of choice B, i think" propose to "will be more idiomatic than "propose of doing" So, A wins.
just some sort of personal views.
let me know if you are still baffled.
-- by 会员 CrackingGMAC (2011/9/9 8:16:00)



哈哈哈明白了~木有看后面啊~if enacted 刚好确定了必须是proposal~~~3Q  CrackingGMAC~~~~~
作者: tutukova    时间: 2013-7-1 17:42
不明白为什么是proposal to, proposal of 语法也是对的呀。B选项是否是因为 its merits may be中的may be 有问题呢?




欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3