ChaseDream

标题: [求助]确认2道题目 [打印本页]

作者: weiyu    时间: 2004-6-20 02:33
标题: [求助]确认2道题目

Although she had been known as an effective legislator first in the Texas Senate and later



in the United States House of Representatives, not until Barbara Jordan’s participation in



the hearings on the impeachment of President Richard Nixon in 1974 was she made a



nationally recognized figure, as it was televised nationwide.



A. later in the United States House of Representatives, not until Barbara Jordan’s



participation in the hearings on the impeachment of President Richard Nixon in



1974 was she made a nationally recognized figure, as it was



B. later in the United States House of Representatives, Barbara Jordan did not



become a nationally recognized figure until 1974, when she participated in the



hearings on the impeachment of President Richard Nixon, which were



C. later in the Untied States House of Representatives, it was not until 1974 that



Barbara Jordan became a nationally recognized figure, with her participation in



the hearings on the impeachment of President Richard Nixon, which was



D. then also later in the United States House of Representatives, not until 1974 did



Barbara Jordan become a nationally recognized figure, as she participated in the



hearings on the impeachment of President Richard Nixon, being



E. then also later in the United States House of Representatives, Barbara Jordan did



not become a nationally recognized figure until 1974, when she participated in the



hearings on the impeachment of President Richard Nixon, which was






I choose A; answer is B; I do not think “which” can refer to “hearings"; A good example is a question " to 10 percent from 6 percent of its market, which..." "which can refer to market clearly" while "from 6 percent of its market to 10 percent in the country, which" "whcih cannot refer to markey"









Turning away from literary realism to write romantic stories about the peasant life and



landscape of northern Sweden, in 1909 Selma Lagerlöf was the novelist who became the



first woman and was also the first Swedish writer to win the Nobel Prize for Literature.



A. Turning away from literary realism to write romantic stories about the peasant life



and landscape of northern Sweden, in 1909 Selma Lagerlöf was the novelist who



became the first woman and was also the first Swedish writer to win



B. She turned away from literary realism and wrote romantic stories about the



peasant life and landscape of northern Sweden, and novelist Selma Lagerlöf in



1909 became the first woman as well as the first Swedish writer that won



C. Selma Lagerlöf was a novelist who turned away from literary realism to write



romantic stories about the peasant life and landscape of northern Sweden, and in



1909 she became the first woman in addition to the first Swedish writer winning



D. A novelist who turned away from literary realism to write romantic stories about



the peasant life and landscape of northern Sweden, Selma Lagerlöf became in



1909 the first woman and also the first Swedish writer to win



E. As a novelist, Selma Lagerlöf turned away from literary realism and wrote



romantic stories about the peasant life and landscape of northern Sweden, in 1909



becoming the first woman and also the first Swedish writer that won






I choose A; answer is D; “and also” in D and E may be wrong, I remember OG regards “and also” as redundant error??



[此贴子已经被作者于2004-6-20 2:35:04编辑过]

作者: rt316    时间: 2004-6-20 03:11

第一题B,hearings在这里解释为:听证会,也的确是这个听证会were televised nationwide。A中的it指代不明确或不合理。


第二题D,首先,我大致查了一遍OG,没有找到明确说明‘and also多余’的解释,OG中大量的and also是由于not only..but also搭配的错误。(不过,我找得不是太仔细,希望进一步确认。)。对A的错误有如下看法:首先,这个句子用分词结构不尽合理,turn away和became是明确的先后动作,所以用分词表示一定程度上的伴随不妥;此外,in 1909这个状语的位置也不是很好;此外,turning作为动作的伴随,与主句中was而不是主句中who从句的became形成匹配,这是一个严重错误;另外;was the novelist who became the first woman and was also the first句子中的平行结构混乱and后的was结构即可以与第一个was平行,也可能被理解为与became平行;
对不起,其他答案没有仔细看,觉得D好像没有什么错误。


[此贴子已经被作者于2004-6-20 3:12:39编辑过]

作者: bon    时间: 2004-6-20 09:49

第一题,which指代the impeachment

第二题,我的stone意见相左,恰恰d的in 1909位置不对,a把它放在人名前我倒觉得没什么不对;另外

turn away和became是明确的先后动作,所以用分词表示一定程度上的伴随不妥

分词结构不仅可以表示伴随,还可以表示原因,结果,条件,让步等情况,这里完全可以用分词表示先于become发生的情况。


作者: tianwan    时间: 2004-6-20 10:37

1, The "which were" wants a plural antecedant of which, thus only "hearings" meets this requirement.


作者: rt316    时间: 2004-6-20 10:50
以下是引用bon在2004-6-20 9:49:00的发言:

第一题,which指代the impeachment


第二题,我的stone意见相左,恰恰d的in 1909位置不对,a把它放在人名前我倒觉得没什么不对;另外


turn away和became是明确的先后动作,所以用分词表示一定程度上的伴随不妥


分词结构不仅可以表示伴随,还可以表示原因,结果,条件,让步等情况,这里完全可以用分词表示先于become发生的情况。


第一题,A中it指代impeachment也是逻辑上比较可行的方案,但是即便是单数指代,作为修饰成分的impeachment(出自:in the hearings on the impeachment of )也不应该是优先的指代对象,虽然我们从句子的逻辑上判断,impeachment或许更合理,但是,为什么不可能是participation呢?或许从就近修饰的角度看,figure也不失为一个选择。所以,我认为,第一题it的指代不明确。另外,was she made a nationally recognized figure这个被动语态也有问题,因为动作的逻辑主语相当模糊,是某个人?还是某件事?还是媒体?等等都不清楚,所以这个被动结构也显得不好。

第二题,如A所示,其状语结构in 1909 Selma Lagerlöf was the novelist who became the first woman and ...表达意思不准确,作者想要表达的是:L这个人在1909年became XX,但是,A结构的意思却可以被理解为:L这个人在1909年的时候才是个作家,而这个作家在某个没有表明的时间里became XX。而D中Selma Lagerlöf became in 1909 the first woman就讲状语与其所要修饰的动作连在一起,明确表明1909年,L became XX。

虽然在一定程度上,我赞成你的看法:分词结构不仅可以表示伴随,还可以表示原因,结果,条件,让步等情况,这里完全可以用分词表示先于become发生的情况。但是,我并不认为上述的理由是没有限制的,当两个动作之间没有密切的联系,或没有一点伴随的含义时,动作与动作之间应该用andl连接比较好,因为and就是强调了动作的先后。在此题中,turn away的确应该发生在became前,但是,became动作的发生必定是turn away动作结束后才开始的,不会是伴随着turn away这个动作开始的,所以,用分词结构不合适。


[此贴子已经被作者于2004-6-20 10:50:59编辑过]

作者: mariezhu    时间: 2004-6-20 11:28

第一题的A中it缺少合理的指代对象,BJ's..she也违反了代词不能指代possessive noun的原则,尽管这条原则事实证明有时也有例外,并非公理,但是这个句子里改成her, BJ句子明显要顺畅许多,另外sb is made a well known figure好像也不如sb becomes a well known figure来得简洁利落

D选项里的which were没问题,虽然离hearings是远了点,但是中间的impeachment和President Nixon都是单数, 所以没有歧义

第二题A的最大问题在于Selma Lagerlöf was the novelist who became the first woman and was also the first Swedish writer to win,因为有了这个and把前面的woman和writer to win给割裂开了,成了单纯的SL was the novelist who become the first woman,逻辑上不能成立.其实本题想要表达的是SL became the (first women and also the first swedish writer) to win nobel prize


作者: tianwan    时间: 2004-6-20 11:34

2,D   Selma Lagerlöf became in 1909 the first woman and also the first Swedish writer to win

D的in1909的位置在动词和宾语之间,这应该是错的呀。


作者: bon    时间: 2004-6-20 12:03
以下是引用tianwan在2004-6-20 10:37:00的发言:

1, The "which were" wants a plural antecedant of which, thus only "hearings" meets this requirement.



you are right
作者: bon    时间: 2004-6-20 12:21
以下是引用tianwan在2004-6-20 11:34:00的发言:

2,D   Selma Lagerlöf became in 1909 the first woman and also the first Swedish writer to win


D的in1909的位置在动词和宾语之间,这应该是错的呀。


我也觉得很奇怪


作者: jeremy2000    时间: 2004-6-20 14:07

1.which不是说只能修饰前面紧挨着的名词吗?为什么能修是如此遥远的hearings?

2。from literary realism to write romantic stories 中的from和to后面的短语不是应该并列吗?


作者: weiyu    时间: 2004-6-20 14:35

I have the same puzzle with jeremy;


As of B that are (that can refer to plural noun As, because it is a restrictive clause)


For non-restrictive clause, ( As of B, which were: does which must refer to B in syntaticly??)


To be discussed....


作者: tianwan    时间: 2004-6-20 15:09

The "to" phrase is a infinite phrase as a purpose adverbial part.


作者: 青鸟    时间: 2004-6-20 15:25

Turning away from literary realism to write romantic stories about the peasant life and



landscape of northern Sweden, in 1909 Selma Lagerlöf was the novelist who became the



first woman and was also the first Swedish writer to win the Nobel Prize for Literature.



A. Turning away from literary realism to write romantic stories about the peasant life



and landscape of northern Sweden, in 1909 Selma Lagerlöf was the novelist who



became the first woman and was also the first Swedish writer to win



B. She turned away from literary realism and wrote romantic stories about the



peasant life and landscape of northern Sweden, and novelist Selma Lagerlöf in



1909 became the first woman as well as the first Swedish writer that won



C. Selma Lagerlöf was a novelist who turned away from literary realism to write



romantic stories about the peasant life and landscape of northern Sweden, and in



1909 she became the first woman in addition to the first Swedish writer winning



D. A novelist who turned away from literary realism to write romantic stories about



the peasant life and landscape of northern Sweden, Selma Lagerlöf became in



1909 the first woman and also the first Swedish writer to win



E. As a novelist, Selma Lagerlöf turned away from literary realism and wrote



romantic stories about the peasant life and landscape of northern Sweden, in 1909



becoming the first woman and also the first Swedish writer that won






I choose A; answer is D; “and also” in D and E may be wrong, I remember OG regards “and also” as redundant error??



不同意a有很多,其中除了不简洁之外,in 1909 Selma Lagerlöf was the novelist who




became the first woman and was also the first Swedish writer to win(这句话实在太罗嗦了,还不如说in 1909the novelist  Selma Lagerlöf  became the first woman and  also the first Swedish writer to win。。。


还有就是这个turning away...


og 说:The “-ing” (present participle) form introduces action that is simultaneous with the action of the main clause; i.e., bringing indicates that the number of wild birds became 34 when the sea eagles left their nests。。。



turning away..... in 1909 Selma Lagerlöf became 。。。是表示同时发生的,而这个和句意不符合。


d中的in 1909虽然插入有点别扭,但是并不妨碍全句的理解,而且我认为在这里提前还有一个是原因可能是强调。另外一个原因很有可能是ets故意的一种混淆。 两害相权,取其轻。在这里并没有错。所以选D


如果改成


A novelist who turned away from literary realism to write romantic stories about the peasant life and landscape of northern Sweden, Selma Lagerlöf became the first woman and also the first Swedish writer to win the Nobel Prize for Literature in 1909.


应该更好理解一点。




[此贴子已经被作者于2004-6-20 15:26:07编辑过]

作者: 青鸟    时间: 2004-6-20 15:35
以下是引用jeremy2000在2004-6-20 14:07:00的发言:

1.which不是说只能修饰前面紧挨着的名词吗?为什么能修是如此遥远的hearings?


2。from literary realism to write romantic stories 中的from和to后面的短语不是应该并列吗?



which 一般是就近修饰原则,原因是避免引起歧义,而在这里later in the United States House of Representatives, Barbara Jordan did not



become a nationally recognized figure until 1974, when she participated in the



hearings on the impeachment of President Richard Nixon, which were
which前面是人,which显然不能用来修饰
人,所以避免了歧义,应该可取。在这里我想强调一下,有些规则,只是用来避免引起歧义的,所以应该灵活运用。




[此贴子已经被作者于2004-6-20 15:39:14编辑过]

作者: weiyu    时间: 2004-6-20 15:51
以下是引用青鸟在2004-6-20 15:25:00的发言:


还有就是这个turning away...

og 说:The “-ing” (present participle) form introduces action that is simultaneous with the action of the main clause; i.e., bringing indicates that the number of wild birds became 34 when the sea eagles left their nests。。。



turning away..... in 1909 Selma Lagerlöf became 。。。是表示同时发生的,而这个和句意不符合。


I have the different opinion:


OG indicates that the present participle phrase before the main clause hints an action happening ahead of the action in main clause???


left nest, brining... (participle phrase after main clause hints the two actions occur simutaniously..??)


12.   Traveling the back roads of Hungary, in 1905 Béla Bartók and Zoltán Kodály began their pioneering work in ethnomusicology, and they were armed only with an Edison phonograph and insatiable curiosity.


(A) Traveling the back roads of Hungary, in 1905 Béla Bartók and Zoltán Kodály began their pioneering work in ethnomusicology, and they were armed only


(B) In 1905, Béla Bartók and Zoltán Kodály, traveling the back roads of Hungary, began their pioneering work in ethnomusicology, and they were only armed


(C) In 1905 Béla Bartók and Zoltán Kodály began their pioneering work in ethnomusicology, traveling the back roads of Hungary armed only


(D) Having traveled the back roads of Hungary, in 1905 Béla Bartók and Zoltán Kodály began their pioneering work in ethnomusicology; they were only armed(C)


(E) Béla Bartók and Zoltán Kodály, in 1905 began their pioneering work in ethnomusicology, traveling the back roads of Hungary, arming themselves only


Choices A and B are wordy and imprecise: the phrasing suggests that Bartok and Kodaly were already traveling the back roads of Hungary when they began their pioneering work, not that they traveled the back roads in order to conduct such work.



作者: 青鸟    时间: 2004-6-20 16:20

这里是说开始旅行的时候,就是他们开始 their pioneering work 阿,两个动作是同时发生的。

(C) In 1905 Béla Bartók and Zoltán Kodály began their pioneering work in ethnomusicology, traveling the back roads of Hungary armed only

我前面引用的是og259上的解释。可不是我自己杜撰的。


作者: mariezhu    时间: 2004-6-20 16:55

weiyu说得没错,ing形式og上明确说过如果在main clause之前表示主句动作前已经完成的行为,只有在main clause后才是伴随状语

青鸟你举的例子正是ing在主句后的.

----

不过我不明白为什么大家会觉得in 1906有问题呢?能否再说得清楚一点?


作者: 青鸟    时间: 2004-6-20 17:53

谢谢指教。

即使如此,还是有问题的,因为

Turning away from literary realism to write romantic stories about the peasant

from.. to.. 应该是 Turning away from literary realism to  romantic stories about the peasant 或者

Turning away from (writing) literary realism) to (writing) romantic stories about the peasant 才说得过去。


作者: LES    时间: 2004-6-20 18:29

同意原题目答案完全正确!


对第二题A选项再补充说明一点:看到主句开始是in 1909一眼就应该排除!!!所有OG里面分词状语及代词位于句首时,考点就是主句的一开头必定是逻辑主语!!!这点是不容置疑的!除非分词短语和主句主语同时划线。


还有,偶也搞不懂大家为什么会对became in 1909产生怀疑?


[此贴子已经被作者于2004-6-20 18:33:33编辑过]

作者: weiyu    时间: 2004-6-20 20:08
以下是引用青鸟在2004-6-20 17:53:00的发言:

谢谢指教。


即使如此,还是有问题的,因为


Turning away from literary realism to write romantic stories about the peasant


from.. to.. 应该是 Turning away from literary realism to  romantic stories about the peasant 或者


Turning away from (writing) literary realism) to (writing) romantic stories about the peasant 才说得过去。


好像D也有这个问题:A novelist who turned away from literary realism to write romantic stories about




the peasant life and landscape of northern Sweden


作者: juan    时间: 2004-6-21 01:02

个人觉得这里的to不是固定搭配里from A to B的to,而是不定式to。

另:我也不太明白为什么会对became in 1909产生怀疑?

谢谢指点。


作者: rt316    时间: 2004-6-21 01:53
以下是引用weiyu在2004-6-20 14:35:00的发言:

I have the same puzzle with jeremy;


As of B that are (that can refer to plural noun As, because it is a restrictive clause)


For non-restrictive clause, ( As of B, which were: does which must refer to B in syntaticly??)


To be discussed....


R119-B


Executives and federal officials say that the use of crack and cocaine is growing rapidly among work­ers, significantly compounding the effects of drug and alcohol abuse, which already cost busi­ness more than $100 billion a year.


Choice B, the best answer, uses clear and concise phrasing to state that it is the effects of drug and alcohol abuse that already cost business the sum mentioned.


主谓暗示




作者: rt316    时间: 2004-6-21 02:01

回复weiyu在15楼的帖子:

OG indicates that the present participle phrase before the main clause hints an action happening ahead of the action in main clause???

left nest, brining... (participle phrase after main clause hints the two actions occur simutaniously..??)

**********************************************

Turning away from literary realism to write romantic stories about the peasant 中turning away发生在主句前,但是,这个结构还表达了另一层含义,那就是当主句动作发生的时候,turnging away还继续在发生,这就是分词结构和and连词结构的最大区别。连词结构可以表达两个完全独立的动作。从逻辑上讲,只有turn away结束后才有became的开始。


作者: robertchu    时间: 2004-6-21 03:21
完全同意LES在19楼的意见!
这两道题都是考逻辑主语的.从此入手,问题迎刃而解.


作者: horsefish    时间: 2004-9-23 00:01
Q1: 选B.        A的问题是Barbara Jordan’s 与she无法对应.
作者: Penggary    时间: 2004-10-10 14:20
我提出一点:1中倒装句not until应该表示强调,B中好像在语气上有削弱?我当时看到倒装就选了A。看来,语气问题应该在句子其他语法正确的前提下才考虑。仔细再看,A中until BJ's participation, 犯了until+n.错误,与同OG中的when a child一样。再有,A中的participation不如B中的动词形式好。总之,我支持选B。请大家讨论。
作者: 瑜珑    时间: 2004-12-1 16:29

1. 根据大并列原则,第一个逗号后面应该出现一个名词和句首的she 对应,所以ACD可以立即排除

2.BE开比,首先first in ....and later in ....是很规则的一个并列,它比first in....then also later in ....简洁清晰,而且then本身就有later的含义,意思累赘.

 再者最后一个逗号前on the impeachment of President Richard Nixon 是用来修饰herings的,中心语是herings,所以which 后一定要用复数形式were,而不能用was.

NN们帮我看看,我的理解有问题吗?还有哪些我没有注意到?谢谢


作者: 爱维的天    时间: 2004-12-19 10:33

D﹚和﹙E﹚我觉得看到then…later就先删了语意重复

主动词一致,再删去﹙A﹚﹙C(E)

只剩﹙B﹚了


作者: kant    时间: 2005-4-28 05:17

逻辑上说impeachment 是不能直播的,只有听证会hearings才可. 直接选B.


作者: weiweifriends    时间: 2005-8-24 20:20

同意楼上。


which 不管是指代hearings还是impeachment ,好像都太远了点儿啊


在新东方上课的时候老师一再说which,that在GMAT语法中只能指代紧挨着的名词啊


作者: lisa_li_shu    时间: 2005-10-23 20:18

oh, could somebody tell me for the first question,


why choose the answer B? which one is "which" supposed to refer? how could it refer to some item not adjacent with it?



thanks


作者: lizhi7984    时间: 2005-10-24 03:28
对啊,我也觉得in 1909的位置很怪,我本来想选d,但是在犹豫这个时间状语的位置的时候,决定了选e。
作者: 乌龙茶    时间: 2005-12-29 10:56

第一题的C为何不对?


作者: 赫连勃勃    时间: 2005-12-29 11:58

Turn away from 是厌恶的意思,to 是不定式,google上搜到很多例子



As the individual must repent and turn away from sin to avoid the consequences
of sin, which is death, so must the nations repent and turn away from sin, to
avoid the consequences of sin, which is destruction.


作者: soloenti    时间: 2006-8-25 15:35
the hearings on the impeachment of President Richard Nixon, which was  televised nationwide  应该是指hearings televised  而不是impeachment
作者: tangzimo    时间: 2007-10-20 15:48
以下是引用bon在2004-6-20 9:49:00的发言:

第一题,which指代the impeachment

第二题,我的stone意见相左,恰恰d的in 1909位置不对,a把它放在人名前我倒觉得没什么不对;另外

turn away和became是明确的先后动作,所以用分词表示一定程度上的伴随不妥

分词结构不仅可以表示伴随,还可以表示原因,结果,条件,让步等情况,这里完全可以用分词表示先于become发生的情况。

第一题的which是指hearings

要是指the impeachment还能用were吗?

……


作者: tangzimo    时间: 2007-10-20 15:50
以下是引用乌龙茶在2005-12-29 10:56:00的发言:

第一题的C为何不对?

which从意思上来说只能指hearings

所以C中的was不对


作者: lulu_odin    时间: 2008-5-3 11:19

作者: dirrrk    时间: 2008-10-26 20:50
which  可以跳跃修饰
作者: johnbelieve    时间: 2008-12-23 16:04
请问一下hearings是复数指的是一系列的听证会吗…………谢谢
作者: kingwangfei    时间: 2009-4-29 00:05
第一题的 D 有什么问题呢?
作者: mars_cheung    时间: 2009-9-24 18:21

第一题的 D 很多错误。

1、and then also 的表达很奇怪,then 的存在强加了因果关系,and 与 also 也有重复之嫌。这里不是用于连接两个句子,要表达“和、并列”的意思,and足够了,不需画蛇添足的多一个also。

2、as 引导的时间状语从句,表随着……发生,用在这里不及when好。

3、being的表达错误。being 无论做定语修饰 Nixon,还是做伴随作用,均不合逻辑。这里需要用 which 引导的定语从句,跳跃修饰 hearings。


作者: wcc0523    时间: 2010-4-3 14:34
LZ你非要把题搞成这个不能让人看的样子么
作者: lydiar_020    时间: 2010-4-22 22:26
发表于: 2004-12-01 16:29:00 - IP:*.*.*.* 只看该用户 大 中 小 #26
1. 根据大并列原则,第一个逗号后面应该出现一个名词和句首的she 对应,所以ACD可以立即排除


请问,似乎不能拿这条来排除D吧?还有,不保持原句中的倒装,不会导致什么强调重心的改变吗?
第一,他保留了倒装not until 1974 did Barbara Jordan become a nationally recognized figure
第二,在倒装中,他的主语仍然是Barbara Jordan

A.    then also later in the United States House of Representatives, not until 1974 did Barbara Jordan become a nationally recognized figure, as she participated in the hearings on the impeachment of President Richard Nixon, being




欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3