标题: og10 164题 期待大神来解答 [打印本页] 作者: 我住小桥边 时间: 2011-3-26 17:35 标题: og10 164题 期待大神来解答 164. The commission proposed that funding for the park's development, which could be open to the public early next year. is obtained through a local bond issue. (A) that funding for the park's development, which could be open to the public early next year, is (B) that funding for development of the park, which could be open to the public early next year, be (C) funding for the development of the park, perhaps open to the public early next year, to be (D) funds for the park's development, perhaps open to the public early next year, be (E) development funding for the park, which could be open to the public early next year, is to be Choice B is best. Choice A attaches the relative clause which could be open ... to the noun development, when, in fact, it is the park that could be open. Choice C omits that, the object of proposed that is needed to introduce the clause describing the proposal. C also uses to be unidiomatically where be is correct: the commission proposed [that] funding ... to be obtained is wrong. Choice D incorrectly uses perhaps open to the public ... to modify development; the phrase should modify park. Choice E, which seriously distorts meaning, says that the commission proposed development funding and that such funding could be open to the public .... 疑问就是在最后一句，为什么这里的which就可以跳跃修饰前面的development，而前面的选项就不可以？作者: 我住小桥边 时间: 2011-3-26 17:37
顶一下作者: 我住小桥边 时间: 2011-3-26 17:37
有没有人咩？作者: dawn19 时间: 2011-4-4 16:04
http://forum.chasedream.com/GMAT_SC/thread-53201-1-1.html 已经被讨论过了。这里集聚了大牛以及官方回复。作者: aeoluseros 时间: 2011-4-4 20:45
E里面which修饰的是funding.作者: 安然向人 时间: 2011-4-5 11:10
只有在核心词+修饰成分（一般为介词短语）的情况下，which从句才能够跳跃修饰成分直接修饰前面的核心词，而且目前GMAT中出现的题最多只能跳跃一次。（参见prep2007-2-101B） 如版主所说，从逻辑上可以知道which从句修饰的是founding.funding for development of the park短语，which从句要想修饰founding的话就跳跃了两次——of the "park"和for "development. 表意上易让人迷惑，not ideomatic. development funding for the park短语中，核心词很明显，后面只有一个简单的介词短语，和所有GMAT中跳跃修饰的情况一样，因此which直接跳跃for the park修饰核心词founding不会有歧义，属于英语中的通常表达方式，所以有了ets这样的解释。 P.S. 不知是否可以讨论一下关于核心词具体的定义标准。
