ChaseDream

标题: 真题一道 [打印本页]

作者: summer614    时间: 2004-4-25 10:48
标题: 真题一道

most of portugal’s 250000 university boycotted classes in a one-day strike to protest a law that reuires them to contribute 330 a year toward the cost of higher education , previously paying 7 per year.


Year , compared to the previously 7 per year, toward the cost of higher education


Year toward the cost of higher education , instead of the 7 per year required previously


这题选b,最后一个为什么不行


作者: JerryGuan    时间: 2004-4-25 12:02

此题,我选第一个选肢:year , compared to the previously 7 per year, toward the cost of higher education

原句A:paying语法上是伴随主句谓语boycotted,语义上它应该和contribute伴随,所以,挥泪告别;

给出的两个选肢,我认为第一个好;原因是它是在比较今年和前一年的情况,并不是如instead of在表达同一事物同一时间状态的两种alternative。


作者: dreadpower    时间: 2004-4-25 12:23

   这个题目选B???楼主是指上面一个选项还是下面一个选项???我觉得这个题目选上面一个选项

   理由:第一:逻辑意思来看,instead of表示rather than的意思,怎么读这个意思都不如compared to好

          第二:instead of后的内容必须和reuires them to contribute 后的内容平行,但是reuires them to contribute 7 per year required previously就肯定不对了

      TO JerryGuan,我觉得此题的谓语是strike to 而不是boycotted,主语是most of portugal’s 250000 university boycotted classes


作者: weiyu    时间: 2004-4-25 17:25
以下是引用pumpkin在2004-4-25 15:19:00的发言:


Most of portugal’s 250000 university boycotted classes in a one-day strike to protest a law that reuires them to contribute 330 a Year toward the cost of higher education , instead of the 7 per year required previously

两个东东平行的

还请指教

乱说一气

谢谢



我同意Pumpkin MM的意见, 判断方法和我的一点都没区别。我选最后一个。


作者: mariezhu    时间: 2004-4-25 17:43

contribute 330 a year instead of THE 7 per year?


作者: dreadpower    时间: 2004-4-25 18:38

   pumpkin  MM,我觉得最后一个肯定错

   上面我的帖子说了:最根本的理由就是如果平行的话,应该可以写成这样

   requires them to contribute 7 per year required previously

   所以错


作者: JerryGuan    时间: 2004-4-25 21:40

Most of portugal's 250000 university boycotted classes in a one-day strike to protest a law that reuires them to contribute 330 a year , compared to the previously 7 per year, toward the cost of higher education.

25万家大学中的大部分联合起来进了一天的罢工,以抵制一项法律,这项法律要求他们上交330toward the cost of higher education,而前一年却只是每年7。

strike是罢工,名词。


作者: dreadpower    时间: 2004-4-25 21:57

   哦,对,谓语问题是我错了!!谢谢JerryGuan

   


作者: renprince    时间: 2004-5-25 21:47
以下是引用summer614在2004-4-25 10:48:00的发言:

Most of portugal’s 250000 university boycotted classes in a one-day strike to protest a law that reuires them to contribute 330 a year toward the cost of higher education , previously paying 7 per year.

a. year toward the cost of higher education , previously paying 7 per year.

paying没有明确修饰对象, 错

b. Year , compared to the previously 7 per year, toward the cost of higher education

compared to表示两个东东性质完全不同, 但是有个类似的一方面, 错

c. Year toward the cost of higher education , instead of the 7 per year required previously

toward有点怪怪的. 但是偶选这个.

这题选b,最后一个为什么不行

compared to表示两个东东性质完全不同, 但是有个类似的一方面, 错????为什么呢

有什么依据吗?

谢谢


作者: mariezhu    时间: 2004-5-26 00:12

With "compare to" you put the emphasis on similarity 把..比作

while with "compare with" you put the emphasis on difference, 把...和..比较

hope it helps...


作者: ruiyu25    时间: 2004-5-26 15:01

I choose C.  I think "compare to" in B is wrong.  

Please help!


作者: susanyaki    时间: 2004-5-26 17:54

赞同renprince 的说法,为什么不是C


作者: cranberry    时间: 2004-5-26 19:12
sth is compared to 的意思是XX被比作什么,而不是和XX相比的意思
作者: wildwind    时间: 2004-5-26 23:13

如果选 C 的话,  instead of 后面的内容既可以认为是取代 330 a year,  也可以取代 the cost of higher education     如果仅从逻辑而言,  更应该是修饰后者,  这显然不合原意.

从OG 上的题看, rather than/ instead of 应紧跟其要修饰的对象.

关于compare with, compare to 的区别有时并不绝对,   From Longman

Los Angeles is large, compared to/ with Boston.

而且我认为此题的关键不在compare, 而是必须明确表达 300 a year 和 7 per year 的关系

所以我认为B 好, 望指正.


作者: LES    时间: 2004-5-26 23:53
楼主,请把题目先补全!!!




欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3