ChaseDream

标题: 请教GWD-TN16-24,大家看有没有争议? [打印本页]

作者: 风林火山    时间: 2009-11-9 16:38
标题: 请教GWD-TN16-24,大家看有没有争议?
24. GWD25-Q24
Although improved efficiency in converting harvested trees into wood products may reduce harvest rates, it will stimulate demand by increasing supply and lowering prices, thereby boosting consumption.

A.    in converting harvested trees into wood products may reduce harvest rates, it will stimulate demand by increasing supply and lowering prices, thereby boosting
B.    in converting harvested trees into wood products may reduce harvest rates, demand will be stimulated because of increasing supply and lowering prices, which boost
C.    of converting harvested trees into wood products may reduce harvest rates, it will stimulate demand by increasing supply and lowering prices, which boosts
D.    of harvested trees being converted into wood products may reduce harvest rates, it will stimulate demand, because it will increase supply and lower prices, thereby boosting
E.    when harvested trees are converted into wood products may reduce harvest rates, demand will be stimulated because of increasing supply and lowering prices, which boost

答案选B我选A。 大家能说说理由吗?
作者: aeoluseros    时间: 2009-11-9 17:01
A的it无所指.
作者: 风林火山    时间: 2009-11-9 19:41
我觉得,it refers to improved efficiency,可以吗?
作者: aeoluseros    时间: 2009-11-10 00:06
umm...如果it指代improved efficiency,那么improved efficiency这么一个"稳定性"的名词,与increasing supply and lowering prices不搭配。
如果是improving efficiency倒是可以执行increase supply这种动作...
所以A读起来是很不爽的.
作者: payo    时间: 2009-11-11 13:21
我觉得A
B理解起来费力 一眼看不太出which指代 改成increased/lowered可能会好点
而且B具备了多个GMAT错误选项的特征
A逻辑连贯 先说缺点再说优点 B的逻辑被demand打断 读完不知所云
作者: dqyl0    时间: 2009-11-11 14:26
我觉得也是A
有没有更权威的解释?
作者: davidshenliang    时间: 2010-3-21 14:32
A错,it无指代
作者: masushuang    时间: 2012-5-2 22:02
it 指代前句从句的主语。很通顺的。prep破解里面讲到指代问题,如果从句在前,主语不是代词,那么主句代词优先指代从句主语。
作者: weidehou    时间: 2012-5-3 16:57
我也觉得是a,which 不知道修饰的啥




欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3