ChaseDream

标题: [求助]OG11th-67 [打印本页]

作者: margaretzxy 时间: 2009-2-4 20:35
标题: [求助]OG11th-67

Defense attorneys have occasionally argued that their clients’ misconduct stemmed from a reaction to something ingested, but in attributing criminal or delinquent behavior to some food allergy, the perpetrators are in effect told that they are not responsible for their actions.

(A) in attributing criminal or delinquent behavior to some food allergy
(B) if criminal or delinquent behavior is attributed to an allergy to some food
(C) in attributing behavior that is criminal or delinquent to an allergy to some food
(D) if some food allergy is attributed as the cause of criminal or delinquent behavior
(E) in attributing a food allergy as the cause of criminal or delinquent behavior

疑问：ＯＧ答案中说Ａ选项中有incorrect idiom，看解释似乎说的是attribute的用法，但是我没有看出它的用法有错误，请教大家这里的错误指的

是什么呢？

作者: yuminjia 时间: 2009-2-4 22:55
A中的in attributing 的主语是the perpetrators 不合逻辑 ;实际上是Defense attorneys attribut

作者: margaretzxy 时间: 2009-2-4 23:02

谢谢：）

我知道这个错误点，但是对于OG上给出的答案中的incorrect idiom不甚理解。

我在想是不是some food allergy有问题，用allegy to some food更好

作者: yuminjia 时间: 2009-2-4 23:11

我觉得这个不应该是最致命的错误点逻辑错误应该首先考虑到

食物过敏应该是B的用法更好

作者: 118lightyear 时间: 2009-2-5 16:39

some food allergy
可以理解为某种的食物过敏

或者对某种食物的过敏

有歧异，所以B是对的

当然首先要看的是逻辑错误

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)