ChaseDream

标题: 急!! 明天考试, 请NN们帮忙解释两题SC [打印本页]

作者: wenfei86    时间: 2008-12-30 00:14
标题: 急!! 明天考试, 请NN们帮忙解释两题SC

1。The 151 member governments of the world bank are expected to increase the bank's funding by $75 billion, though some United States legislators cite an obstacle to congressional passage being the concern that the bank's loans will help foreign producers compete with American businesses.

Answer: as an obstacle to congressional passage the concern

Question:  为什么 "the concern, an obstacle to congressional passage,"  是错的呢?

 

2. With surface tempratures estimated at minus 230 degrees Fahrenheight, Jupiter's moon Europa has long been considered far too cold to support life, and with 60 square miles of water thought to be forzen from top to bottom.

Answer: Europa has long been considered far too cold ot support life, its

我也知道A不对, 可我觉得正确答案中也却个连接词, ex. ...with its.... 不然的话"its..." 这段话不久像是吊在那儿了吗?

3. The new image of Stone Age people as systematic hunters of large animals, rather than merely scavenging for meat, have emerged from the examination of tools found in Germany, including three wooden spears that archaeologists believe to be about 400, 000 years old.

Answer: mere scavengers of meat, has emerged from the examination of tools found in Germany, including...

 问: 可以用which include代替吗? 良种modifying的方法有区分吗?

完了完了...令考了这还搞不懂...请那为好心的高人指点指点啊。。。阿米驼佛了真是。。。


作者: pinklover    时间: 2008-12-30 00:36

祝你明天考试顺利。以下个人意见给你参考一下:

1。如果选择"the concern, an obstacle to congressional passage,"  那么后面的定语从句that the bank's loans will help foreign producers compete with American businesses就变成修饰congressional passage了

2。如果加with,那么with its...就是修饰life了

3。应该可以的,因为在这里Germany是单数,所以不会引起歧义


作者: AlienX    时间: 2008-12-30 00:41
2. with沒有並列對象...勉強可以跟to並列, 可是illogical
3. 不可以including在這是介詞修tools; which用來指代就近的noun (phrase)

作者: msuzengli    时间: 2008-12-30 01:18

to 楼上:

能否稍微解释一下WITH短语作伴随的用法呢?


作者: AlienX    时间: 2008-12-30 01:37
修正3rd floor: which應該只能指代就近的noun phrase因為OG上的很多explanations都是這樣說的, 記憶中好像只有一道OG題的which不是指代就近的noun phrase.
2nd floor說的廷有邏輯, 可是prep告訴我們在這種情況下including會比較好
=======================
4th floor, 可以看一下以前NN的總結...個人的總結很菜 - 可以不選就不選, 想選就看with的修飾有沒有可能對
作者: msuzengli    时间: 2008-12-30 02:15

to 楼上:

我刚刚查找了一下关于with短语作伴随的帖子,觉得主句后的with短语只能作伴随状语修饰前面的动词,你觉得呢?


作者: wenfei86    时间: 2008-12-30 03:04

谢谢大家踊跃帮忙讨论!!
作者: AlienX    时间: 2008-12-30 09:12
which指代前面緊接著的noun phrase有一個exception: 如果緊接著的noun是一個人的名字, which會跳指那個人的名字之前的noun (phrase)

作者: sunshine365    时间: 2008-12-30 12:43
关于pinklover
的解释,我有两点不同想法:
关于1, that the bank's loans will help foreign producers compete with American businesses是做the conern的同位语,不是定语。

关于2,无论,its...还是,with its... 都对。因为后面是个独立主格结构,要不要with都行,只不过有with后与主句逻辑关系更加紧密。
欢迎指正






欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3