ChaseDream

标题: 请教2题, 不说来源,看因为见了考友的警告 [打印本页]

作者: yuandong 时间: 2003-12-21 23:30
标题: 请教2题, 不说来源,看因为见了考友的警告
According to analysts, an alliance between three major personal computer companies
and most of the nation's largest local telephone companies would enable customers to receive Internet data over regular telephone lines  (with speeds much higher than is) currently possible
a)    with speeds much higher than is
b)    with speeds that are much higher than are
c)    at much higher speeds as are
d)    at much higher speeds than that
e)    at speeds much higher than are

Heirloom tomatoes, gown from seeds saved from the previous year, only look less appetizing than their round and red supermarket (cousins, often green and striped, or have plenty of bump: and bruises, but are) more flavorful.
a)cousins, often green and striped, or have plenty of bumps and bruises, but are
b)cousins, often green and striped, or with plenty of bumps and bruises, although
c)cousins, often green and striped, or they have plenty of bumps and bruises, although they are
d)cousins; they are often green and striped, or with plenty of bumps and bruises, although
e)cousins; they are often green and striped, or have plenty of bumps and bruises, but they are

大家怎么选择啊?

[此贴子已经被作者于2003-12-21 23:32:45编辑过]

作者: nina23 时间: 2003-12-22 05:37
第一题
a，b得with 用得不对（以。。速度),b中介词短语后跟句子很累赘。a中的is 也不对，如果用系动词应该用are,（参见OG132），c中as不对，D中得that不对，比较得前后因该形式一致都是复数名词。这道题我也问了，问的是不明白E得比较结构，请大侠指点。

作者: nina23 时间: 2003-12-22 05:49
第二提
abc中的often green and striped很模糊，应该是修饰Heirloom tomatoes，
但好像又是在修饰cousins。D改变了句意。 BD中的or连接得是两个并列得句子
所以用WITH 不对。

作者: wikeypig 时间: 2003-12-22 12:04
我觉得第一题是D an alliance 和that对等，at much higher speeds 好象也没错。
第2题ABC解释同意楼上，D中although我觉得不妥，用BUT逻辑较对

作者: 深海的小美人鱼 时间: 2003-12-22 12:12
第一题,我觉得是E对.

作者: 深海的小美人鱼 时间: 2003-12-22 12:17
第二题,我还是觉得E对/

作者: rabbitbug 时间: 2003-12-22 12:26
强烈同意小美人鱼的答案.
呵呵,小美人鱼升级版主了, 还换了漂亮的照片. 恭喜!!

作者: yuandong 时间: 2003-12-22 12:31
第二题的DE答案代词我觉得指代不清楚，不知道是指Heirloom tomatoes还是cousins。

作者: 深海的小美人鱼 时间: 2003-12-22 12:59

以下是引用rabbitbug在2003-12-22 12:26:00的发言：
强烈同意小美人鱼的答案.
呵呵,小美人鱼升级版主了, 还换了漂亮的照片. 恭喜!!

谢谢小兔

作者: rabbitbug 时间: 2003-12-22 13:11
参考一下OG159:
159. While depressed property values can hurt some large investors, they are potentially devastating for home-owners. whose equity--in many cases representing a life's savings--can plunge or even disappear.
(A)    they are potentially devastating for homeowners, whose
(B)    they can potentially devastate homeowners in i.          that their
(C)    for homeowners they are potentially devastating, because their
(D)    for homeowners, it is potentially devastating in that their
(E)    it can potentially devastate homeowners, whose
答案A. 这里在they 出现之前, while从句里面有两个复数名词: values和investers, 如果要产生歧异的话,ETS就不会选A, 因为they指代不清. 但是, ETS既然这么用了,说明they直接指代从句中的主语. 同样的道理, 第二题后面的句子中的单词they, 直接指代主语Heirloom tomatoes, 无歧异.

作者: Snazzy 时间: 2003-12-22 14:21
i can't agree more with Little fish and Rabit

作者: wsrabbit 时间: 2003-12-22 14:32
讨论一下：
rabbitbug美眉在小弟的一个帖子中回复说：
“对于it这种代词, 一定要遵守ETS的准则,只要前面有两个以上的单数名词可以用后面的it指代,即使你能很好的分辨出it 究竟指代哪一个,但是ETS认为, 有的傻子就会分辨不出来,为了让傻子也能分辨出来,就不能这样用it指代.OG中有这样的例子

这一点是否只对It有效？对于they的指代问题没有这样的规则么？

作者: nina23 时间: 2003-12-23 00:10
可是第二题是有分号的，they 只待得很清楚，两个句子得主语都是一个东西。
如果只是在一个句子中而且用逗号隔开的就令当别论了。

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)