100. Wisconsin, Illinois, Florida, and Minnesota have
begun to enforce statewide bans prohibiting landfills to accept leaves, brush, and grass clippings.
(A) prohibiting landfills to accept leaves, brush, and grass clippings
(B) prohibiting that landfills accept leaves, brush, and grass clippings
(C) prohibiting landfills from accepting leaves, brush, and grass clippings
(D) that leaves, brush, and grass clippings cannot be accepted in landfills
(E) that landfills cannot accept leaves, brush, and grass clippings
Choice C is the best answer. Either of the following constructions would be idiomatic here: x forbids y to do z or
x prohibits y from doing z. Choices A and B violate idiom;
\ D and E introduce constructions that, in context, are faulty. First of all, both bans that x cannot be done and
bans that y cannot do x are unidiomatic formulations. Secondly, the negative cannot after bans is illogical.
为什么that从句错呢，可以是解释bans的同位语从句吗？
这个可能我昨天没解释清楚
禁令、规章制度用定语进行修饰时，应用现在分词，表示重复性动作，且禁令、规章制度是该动作的发出者。
哦，明白了，谢谢两位，给了我很多帮助
我的问题有点弱，不过，俺会尽量快速成长的，嘻嘻
NN解释一下为什么说：D and E introduce constructions that, in context, are faulty. First of all, both bans that x cannot be done and bans that y cannot do x are unidiomatic formulations. Secondly, the negative cannot after bans is illogical.
为什么that从句就unidiomatic formulations?
为什么cannot就illogical?
谢谢！
用that多别扭啊
that 指代ban的内容 而ban的内容又是不许抽烟（比如）
用that修饰，就是ban 不许抽烟，别扭吧？
我比较愚钝。
ban that smoking is prohibited。ban prohibiting smoking。感觉没什么区别啊。也没觉得that不合适啊。请再赐教。
先主动 后被动吧
| 欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) | Powered by Discuz! X3.3 |