ChaseDream

标题: 885-14-16 [打印本页]

作者: jeffyang 时间: 2003-11-17 21:16
标题: 885-14-16
Originally developed for detecting air pollutants, a technique called proton-induced x-ray emission, which can quickly analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance without destroying it, is finding uses in medicine, archaeology, and criminology.
(A) Originally developed for detecting air pollutants, a technique called proton-induced x-ray emission, which can quickly analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance without destroying it,
(B) Originally developed for detecting air pollutants, having the ability to analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance without destroying it, a technique called proton induced x-ray emission
(C) A technique originally developed for detecting air pollutants, called proton-induced x-ray emission, which can quickly analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance without destroying it,
(D) A technique originally developed for detecting air pollutants, called proton-induced x-ray emission, which has the ability to analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance quickly and without destroying it,
(E) A technique that was originally developed for detecting air pollutants and has the ability to analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance quickly and without destroying the substance, called proton-induced x-ray emission,

Answer

A)
我覺得(C)也可以 , why ?
thanks ...

作者: bettyofarim 时间: 2003-11-17 21:35
called proton-induced x-ray emission 应该紧跟在修饰词后（a technique ），如果向C这样，called proton-induced x-ray emission 就变成修air pollutants了

作者: jeffyang 时间: 2003-11-17 21:49

以下是引用bettyofarim在2003-11-17 21:35:00的发言：
called proton-induced x-ray emission 应该紧跟在修饰词后（a technique ），如果向C这样，called proton-induced x-ray emission 就变成修air pollutants了

感謝感謝！

作者: bigmouse 时间: 2005-3-18 18:22
A虽然正确，但我有点疑问，which从句是不是有点修饰不清呢，它可以修饰technology也可以修饰emission？请大家执教！！多谢！！

作者: ford424 时间: 2005-3-23 01:14

同问, 为什么说这里which可以跳越修饰, 而都是做后置成分的called不行?!

迷惑了一阵子了, 对于这个要命的跳来跳去.

感谢!!!

作者: ford424 时间: 2005-3-23 16:08
up

作者: ford424 时间: 2005-3-24 12:40
up!先谢过了

作者: 小女公子 时间: 2005-3-25 14:56

a technique called proton-induced x-ray emission

technique是中心词，被非限定性定于从句which修饰

C，which要想修饰tecnique太远了，中间隔了太长串。

一般来说，限定性修饰都不跳。我觉得。非限定性看逻辑意思。尚在总结中。不敢保证。

a technique called proton-induced x-ray emission，which修饰technique还是emission都可以，我觉得。

她叫张曼玉，who is a beauty。她和张都是一个人嘛……哈哈~~

作者: ethyl 时间: 2005-5-1 22:36
俺觉得小女公子的总结需要慎重呀，限制性定语从句可以跳跃修饰滴，这个毫无疑问……

作者: zenger 时间: 2005-8-25 13:42

以下是引用bigmouse在2005-3-18 18:22:00的发言：
A虽然正确，但我有点疑问，which从句是不是有点修饰不清呢，它可以修饰technology也可以修饰emission？请大家执教！！多谢！！

我也一直认为这里的which有点修饰不清。

但是我的理解是这样的：由于前面是 sth1 is called sth2., which修饰sth2时，也是一样可以的（意思没有变）．这有点类似于系表结构．

而called ....在Ｃ所带来的歧义更为严重．

作者: titatita 时间: 2005-12-14 15:24
per 白勇,which引导的定语从句放在长,宽,高,或called引导的修饰成分后,可以跳跃修饰长宽高或called所修饰的名词或名词短语中心词.

作者: amber0919 时间: 2006-3-22 14:42
OG上effects那题,就是跳跃.

作者: fannyyudan 时间: 2006-4-5 21:00

以下是引用titatita在2005-12-14 15:24:00的发言：
per 白勇,which引导的定语从句放在长,宽,高,或called引导的修饰成分后,可以跳跃修饰长宽高或called所修饰的名词或名词短语中心词.

[此贴子已经被作者于2006-4-5 21:10:15编辑过]

作者: cournot 时间: 2006-7-31 08:53

以下是引用bettyofarim在2003-11-17 21:35:00的发言：
called proton-induced x-ray emission 应该紧跟在修饰词后（a technique ），如果向C这样，called proton-induced x-ray emission 就变成修air pollutants了

A technique originally developed for detecting air pollutants, called proton-induced x-ray emission，

我觉得c中called proton-induced x-ray emission 没有修饰air pollutants的嫌疑，而是修饰A technique，proton-induced x-ray emission是单数，怎么可能修饰复数air pollutants？

作者: cournot 时间: 2006-8-14 23:42

Originally developed for detecting air pollutants, a technique called proton-induced x-ray emission, which can quickly analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance without destroying it, is finding uses in medicine, archaeology, and criminology.
(A) Originally developed for detecting air pollutants, a technique called proton-induced x-ray emission, which can quickly analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance without destroying it,
(C) A technique originally developed for detecting air pollutants, called proton-induced x-ray emission, which can quickly analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance without destroying it,
A/C, 倾向于A，C中主语A technique 和谓语is finding似乎隔得太远了，C到底毛病在哪里？

[此贴子已经被作者于2006-8-14 23:44:06编辑过]

作者: 清清小蚂蚁 时间: 2006-9-2 13:53

这里OG11对于C选项的解释。

Called proton-induced X-ray emission should be placed next to a technique and should not be set off by commas; relative clause introduced by which incorrectly and illogically modifies emission

which从句为什么A中的which是对的，修饰technology，而C中的which就是错的，修饰了
emission？？，什么样

的情况下可以跳跃修饰呢

作者: 清清小蚂蚁 时间: 2006-9-6 08:14
顶一下，不明白呢？？？？？

作者: 清清小蚂蚁 时间: 2006-9-6 17:31
狂顶。。。。。。。

作者: 清清小蚂蚁 时间: 2006-9-7 08:51

以下是引用清清小蚂蚁在2006-9-6 17:31:00的发言：
狂顶。。。。。。。

还是105题，顶啊

作者: 清清小蚂蚁 时间: 2006-9-8 09:44
顶一下，等答

作者: sendme 时间: 2006-9-8 11:52

(A) Originally developed for detecting air pollutants, a technique called proton-induced x-ray emission, which can quickly analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance without destroying it,

(C) A technique originally developed for detecting air pollutants, called proton-induced x-ray emission, which can quickly analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance without destroying it,

A 中，先状语从句，后主语+过去分词定语，which 。。都是围绕主语-technique 。

ETS原则：过去分词定语尽量紧接修饰对象，所以 which 没办法，只能放后面。

C 中，不符合惯例。

作者: 清清小蚂蚁 时间: 2006-9-8 12:10
呵呵，想起了国策，一个中心，两个基本点

作者: ana9 时间: 2006-11-4 03:44

very good explanation~~

作者: lovegmat 时间: 2006-12-26 06:28

(A)
Originally developed for detecting air pollutants, a technique called
proton-induced x-ray emission, which can quickly analyze the chemical
elements in almost any substance without destroying it,

(C) A
technique originally developed for detecting air pollutants, called
proton-induced x-ray emission, which can quickly analyze the chemical
elements in almost any substance without destroying it,

A 中，先状语从句，后主语+过去分词定语，which 。。都是围绕主语-technique 。

ETS原则：过去分词定语尽量紧接修饰对象，所以 which 没办法，只能放后面。

C 中，不符合惯例。

猛顶

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)