标题: 请教两个真题 [打印本页] 作者: joywzy 时间: 2003-11-17 10:41 标题: 请教两个真题 8. Contrary to the scholarly wisdom of the 1950’s and early 1960’s that predicted the processes of modernization and rationalization would gradually undermine it, ethnicity is a worldwide phenomenon of increasing importance. (A) would gradually undermine it (B) to be a gradual undermining of it (C) would be a gradual undermining of ethnicity (D) to gradually undermine ethnicity (E) gradually undermining it
答案:A,我选了D,
9. In a leveraged buyout, investors borrow huge sums of money to buy companies, hoping to pay off the debt by using the company’s earnings and to profit richly by the later resale of the companies or their divisions. (A) by using the company’s earnings and to profit (B) by using the companies’ earnings and by profiting (C) using the companies’ earnings and profiting (D) with the company’s earnings, profiting (E) with the companies’ earnings and to profit 答案:E,我选了A,A不是更平行吗?
谢谢.
[此贴子已经被作者于2003-11-17 10:42:28编辑过]
作者: Marrow 时间: 2003-11-17 11:15
8题predicted后面漏了that,sb predicts sth to do,here do's subject is not sth but sb,while here,it is the processes that will eliminate the ethinity. 9 not comany but companies.关于investor能不能using，我始终保留，with和using在这里应该是一个意思。作者: joywzy 时间: 2003-11-17 11:23
T9, by using company's earning / with the company's earning
前面要考虑到逻辑主语,面而后者不用这样的考虑,可能更好.作者: Marrow 时间: 2003-11-17 11:27
hoho,这题的逻辑主语不是investors?有区别么？sb hope to pay off debts by using sth和sb hope to pay off debts with sth的逻辑主语不是sb还会是谁？
[此贴子已经被作者于2003-11-17 11:28:17编辑过]
作者: joywzy 时间: 2003-11-17 11:35
以下是引用Marrow在2003-11-17 11:27:00的发言： hoho,这题的逻辑主语不是investors?有区别么？sb hope to pay off debts by using sth和sb hope to pay off debts with sth的逻辑主语不是sb还会是谁？