ChaseDream
标题: GWD30-2 大家帮帮忙吧,就快考了 [打印本页]
作者: benbenaa 时间: 2007-5-13 15:02
标题: GWD30-2 大家帮帮忙吧,就快考了
Caribou are wary animals with excellent hearing, so stalking them over the treeless landscape, getting close enough to kill it with nothing but a handheld lance, as Dorset people did, required exceptional hunting skill.
- so stalking them over the treeless landscape, getting close enough to kill it
- so to stalk them over the treeless landscape and get close enough to kill one
- so in order to stalk them over the treeless landscape and get close enough to kill one
- and so in order to stalk it over the treeless landscape, getting close enough to kill it
- and so stalking them over the treeless landscape and getting close enough in order to kill it
B the best
搞不懂为什么是 so to 呢
作者: Zeldaw 时间: 2007-5-14 23:44
- so stalking them over the treeless landscape, getting close enough to kill it
- so to stalk them over the treeless landscape and get close enough to kill one
- so in order to stalk them over the treeless landscape and get close enough to kill one
- and so in order to stalk it over the treeless landscape, getting close enough to kill it
- and so stalking them over the treeless landscape and getting close enough in order to kill it
A, D,E的it 均无指代对象
the only difference bwtween b and c is 'in order to' and 'to'
不定式表目的
to更简洁
作者: llxx1985cn 时间: 2007-6-4 18:20
分词不能做主语,而不定式可以,对吗?
作者: qianrene 时间: 2007-6-4 19:05
in order to是连词不能做主语
粉刺可以做主语但是
- so stalking them over the treeless landscape, getting close enough to kill it
用了逗号连接两个粉刺是不对的,应该用AND
作者: mimixiaxia 时间: 2007-8-30 14:43
up
作者: isa0709 时间: 2007-9-1 19:19
up
作者: silly1986 时间: 2007-9-1 20:00
排除法。Caribou are wary animals with excellent hearing
所以后面三个选项中ADE中出现it,则可以全部排除。
C明显不对
故选B
作者: kaijen 时间: 2007-9-7 16:28
我對答案沒有疑問
想問的是:前方若沒有單數名詞 後面可以用one嗎?
我怎麼記得以前在哪裡做過one只可以指代前方所提過的單數名詞
在這一題主詞Caribou是複數 (單複數同型)
有人可以幫忙解答嗎? thx
作者: snowofjune 时间: 2007-12-16 09:29
我也是选B的,但是当时是在B和C中间猜的。到现在都不太明白B和C 到底有没有区别?
作者: eileenmu木 时间: 2008-3-24 20:27
关于不定式做主语还不是很懂,求解。。。
[此贴子已经被作者于2008-3-24 20:30:24编辑过]
作者: lichabrend 时间: 2008-6-17 10:01
up
作者: yzhao26 时间: 2009-3-13 02:30
up
作者: jean1280 时间: 2009-6-25 15:06
UP
作者: jean1280 时间: 2009-6-25 15:08
B中to stalk...and get...
个人觉得get前要加个to才平行啊,to stalk...and to get...所以C满足了平行了啊
作者: KiteRunner 时间: 2009-6-25 15:26
to stalk...表目的所以用不定式,而to与in order to相比更简洁
应该是so to stalk...and (to understood) get close enough...
to stalk与to get是并列表目的的,the to before get is understood and does not need to be repeated. OG里也常出现这种情况
作者: jean1280 时间: 2009-6-25 15:31
thank you MM
作者: Liu_leaf 时间: 2009-7-2 13:38
Caribou are wary animals with excellent hearing, so stalking them over the treeless landscape, getting close enough to kill it with nothing but a handheld lance, as Dorset people did, required exceptional hunting skill.
- so stalking them over the treeless landscape, getting close enough to kill it-1,分词做主语相对强调动作本身,不如使用不定式好;2,分词之间没有连词;3,it没有指代对象;
- so to stalk them over the treeless landscape and get close enough to kill one
- so in order to stalk them over the treeless landscape and get close enough to kill one-in order to...结构做状语,句子没有主语(这里不是不定式做目的状语和in order to之间的区别,而是要求使用不定式做主语:to stalk...and get...required exceptional...);
- and so in order to stalk it over the treeless landscape, getting close enough to kill it-and多余,it没有指代;
- and so stalking them over the treeless landscape and getting close enough in order to kill it
作者: sjtupeeler 时间: 2009-7-2 16:20
以下是引用Zeldaw在2007-5-14 23:44:00的发言:- so stalking them over the treeless landscape, getting close enough to kill it
- so to stalk them over the treeless landscape and get close enough to kill one
- so in order to stalk them over the treeless landscape and get close enough to kill one
- and so in order to stalk it over the treeless landscape, getting close enough to kill it
- and so stalking them over the treeless landscape and getting close enough in order to kill it
A, D,E的it 均无指代对象
the only difference bwtween b and c is 'in order to' and 'to'
不定式表目的
to更简洁
我觉得这边的不定式未必表示目的,可能就是一种动词变名词结构的方式,表示做这件事情。。。
作者: 苹果夹心派 时间: 2009-7-28 09:41
作者: onedayling 时间: 2009-10-7 17:30
我觉得A.D.E都错在it 没有指代,并且so表“所以”时是做连词的不能和and连用。 排除A.D.E
再者, in order to.....结构后缺少动作主语,所以C错。应表达为in order to....,sb do sth. 排除C
所以选B
请问NN这样理解对吗?
欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) |
Powered by Discuz! X3.3 |