ChaseDream

标题: Help! GWD7-10 [打印本页]

作者: luluQ 时间: 2006-10-13 07:54
标题: Help! GWD7-10

Q10 to Q12:

Linda Kerber argued in the mid-

1980’s that after the American Revolution

(1775-1783), an ideology of “republican

Line motherhood” resulted in a surge of edu-

(5) cational opportunities for women in the

United States. Kerber maintained that

the leaders of the new nation wanted

women to be educated in order to raise

politically virtuous sons. A virtuous citi-

(10) zenry was considered essential to the

success of the country’s republican form

of government; virtue was to be instilled

not only by churches and schools, but

by families, where the mother’s role

(15) was crucial. Thus, according to Kerber,

motherhood became pivotal to the fate

of the republic, providing justification for

an unprecedented attention to female

education.

(20) Introduction of the republican moth-

erhood thesis dramatically changed

historiography. Prior to Kerber’s work,

educational historians barely mentioned

women and girls; Thomas Woody’s 1929

(25) work is the notable exception. Examining

newspaper advertisements for acade-

mies, Woody found that educational

opportunities increased for both girls

and boys around 1750. Pointing to “An

(30) Essay on Woman” (1753) as reflecting

a shift in view, Woody also claimed that

practical education for females had

many advocates before the Revolution.

Woody’s evidence challenges the notion

(35)
that the Revolution changed attitudes

regarding female education, although it

may have accelerated earlier trends.

Historians’ reliance on Kerber’s “repub-

lican motherhood” thesis may have

(40) obscured the presence of these trends,

making it difficult to determine to what

extent the Revolution really changed

women’s lives.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Q10:

According to the passage, within the field of educational history, Thomas Woody’s 1929 work was

innovative because it relied on newspaper advertisements as evidence
exceptional in that it concentrated on the period before the American Revolution
unusual in that it focused on educational attitudes rather than on educational practices
controversial in its claims regarding educational opportunities for boys
atypical in that it examined the education of girls

Answer: B

But mine is E.

Proof:

Prior to Kerber’s work,

educational historians barely mentioned

women and girls; Thomas Woody’s 1929

(25) work is the notable exception.

While in the whole article, the author never indicates that no historians concentrated on the period be4 the American Revoluation.

educational historians barely mentioned

women and girls; Thomas Woody’s 1929

(25) work is the notable exception.

While in the whole article, the author never indicates that no historians concentrated on the period be4 the American Revoluation.

作者: gonghao 时间: 2006-10-13 09:40
这个建议放去阅读区

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)