ChaseDream

标题: 请教一道gwd语法,哪位帮忙看看啊,谢谢了!! [打印本页]

作者: jiubuxihuan    时间: 2006-9-16 23:31
标题: 请教一道gwd语法,哪位帮忙看看啊,谢谢了!!

Q16:???

Not only did the systematic clearing of forests in the United States create farmland (especially in the Northeast) and gave consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but it also caused erosion and very quickly deforested whole regions.

 

  1. Not only did the systematic clearing of forests in the United States create farmland (especially in the Northeast) and gave consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but it also
  2. Not only did the systematic clearing of forests in the United States create farmland (especially in the Northeast), which gave consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but also
  3. The systematic clearing of forests in the United States, creating farmland (especially in the Northeast) and giving consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but also
  4. The systematic clearing of forests in the United States created farmland (especially in the Northeast) and gave consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but it also
  5. The systematic clearing of forests in the United States not only created farmland (especially in the Northeast), giving consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but it

   Answer:

此题似乎没有正确答案:Ebut it also, B Which的使用我认为不妥:如果which 修饰farmland则逻辑含义不通,但which引导的全聚又不能修饰前面的整个句子


作者: fusiyu    时间: 2006-9-17 08:23
是B啦
作者: jiubuxihuan    时间: 2006-9-17 12:18

谢谢回复!那选B 是因为which 引导的从句跨越修饰前面的systematic clearing of forests 而不是修饰farmland吗?


作者: iceage_spring    时间: 2006-9-17 12:30

"D" seems a better answer to me. 这里的意思不是递进,而是转折。


作者: cairol    时间: 2006-9-17 22:03

我记得有一条规律是,如果原文为倒装,把倒装语序任意改成了顺序结果,必然错,所以这道题目c d e 我一上来就会直接排除,

not only 放句首,为了强调 

请高人确认!


作者: alarui    时间: 2006-9-20 23:03
not only, but also
作者: renbenzhuyi    时间: 2006-9-20 23:40

it not only...., it but also.....

'it' is surplus.


作者: 蓝夕叶子    时间: 2006-9-21 00:31

我没怎么注意句意。not only but also的结构让我直接选了B。

不过也有和楼主相同的意见

D中but also表达了一个递进的关系。如果不加not only 的话,句意是不完整的。


[此贴子已经被作者于2006-9-21 0:32:47编辑过]

作者: 蓝夕叶子    时间: 2006-9-21 00:34

对了lz改下标题吧:GWD 8-20

方便后人搜索噢


作者: kevin5    时间: 2006-9-21 01:16

我支持E。

1。but前有逗号,后面的分句没有it不妥

2。如lz所说,前面一件事情造成了后面的结果,giving,用结果状语从句好。

最后,not only,but我觉得没有问题,至少我在collins词典中找到了例句,

...,not merely to sweep the floor, but even to move about the room.


作者: 蓝夕叶子    时间: 2006-9-21 01:25

TO LS

我认为在英文词典中找到的例句,不一定说明就符合要求比较高比较严谨的GMAT语法。

gmat语法要求绝对平行,简洁,没有累赘。而一般符合语法习惯的句子在gmat中可能不是最佳选项。

回到这道题目。

我们还是看下og对not only but also 的例子吧。在sc前言中,关于idiom中有这样的话语:

It is important to avoid nonstandard expressionsthough English idioms sometimes do not follow conventional grammatical rules

Examples:

Correct:“She likes to jog in the morning.”

Incorrect:“She likes to jog on the morning.”

所以我认为,没有not only but also的结构,就是绝对错误的。

说的不对的地方还请指正。

关于B我也确实有疑问,就是关于which修饰的问题。还请多多指教。






欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3