ChaseDream

标题: 885题Section 2的20 [打印本页]

作者: hlyndon 时间: 2003-10-8 22:59
标题: 885题Section 2的20
20.The lawyer for the defense charged that she suspected the police of having illegally taped her confidential conversations with her client and then used the information obtained to find evidence supporting their murder charges.
(A) used the information obtained to find evidence supporting
(B) used such information as they obtained to find evidence supporting
(C) used the information they had obtained to find evidence that would support
(D) of using the information they had obtained to find evidence that would support
(E) of using such information as they obtained to find evidence that would be supportive of
答案是D。我想这里用of using是为了和前面的of having illegally taped相区别吧。但是为什么use和tape不能用同样的时态呢？另外，我觉得evidence that would support太累赘了，为什么不能用evidence supporting？

作者: nina23 时间: 2003-10-8 23:48
If you don't use "of using" ,the"used"wil be seen not only as a parallelism of "taped",but as that of "charged",It bring some confuse to reader.

As for"evidence that would support",the lawyer suspected the police ....that means evidence support their murder charges should use subjective mood.

[此贴子已经被作者于2003-10-8 23:48:20编辑过]

作者: hlyndon 时间: 2003-10-9 23:09
thanks

作者: dashasha 时间: 2004-4-30 16:09

可是D）好像也不对。 then 后面加of 觉得很别扭。

[此贴子已经被作者于2004-4-30 16:10:41编辑过]

作者: JerryGuan 时间: 2004-4-30 16:17
suspected the police of having illegally taped (her confidential conversations with her client) and then of using the information

作者: dashasha 时间: 2004-5-1 02:15
可是我觉得这样用很别扭。如果把THEN和OF颠倒过来或许会好些。请继续指正。

作者: xx2004 时间: 2004-6-24 08:30

我想补全了应该是

suspected the police of doing sth and then (the police) of doing sth.

作者: sunshining 时间: 2004-7-6 19:36

怀疑警察录音和使用，tape和use是两个先后动作，所以前面那个用完成时，后面那个加上then表示

suspected the police of having illegally taped (her confidential conversations with her client) and then of using the information

不知道这样解释对不对啊，否则我就会当作have taped and (have)used看了

作者: 麻集爱 时间: 2004-7-12 21:34

在顶上来问问还是不明白阿。 If you don't use "of using" ,the"used"wil be seen not only as a parallelism of "taped",but as that of "charged",It bring some confuse to reader.

上面这点对

As for"evidence that would support",the lawyer suspected the police ....that means evidence support their murder charges should use subjective mood.

下面这点。。。。什么时候必须要订于从句呢？什么时候有作状语的嫌疑呢？

作者: LISAYUAN750616 时间: 2004-8-13 11:07
选D怎么能造成混淆了我看不出它就是TAPED AND USED 并列为什么不可能不要笑，急！

作者: leeon 时间: 2004-8-13 11:13
答案就是D呀，A.B.C的used有和前面suspected并列的嫌疑，所以造成混淆。

作者: adaqiu 时间: 2004-12-31 11:15

用used会造成歧义，一种是the lawyer for the defense charged that ....and then used that......，另一种就是我们所理解的，used和taped并列。

我这道题也做错了。根据nn的解释和做题的感觉，归纳答题技巧如下：ets prefer 补充介词的并列结构，如call for... and for....，所以下次做题的时候如果选项里有补充了介词的，应优先考虑

作者: wwwhahchn 时间: 2005-2-3 23:07

這題應該主要攷的是used和of using吧？

至于后麵的that would support和supporting，我覺得不是該題的攷點，如果D換成evidence supporting應該也對吧？？

作者: flyingwings 时间: 2005-7-11 09:58
then不是一个只能用于连接有顺序的动作的连词吗？

这里的then of....分明是连接的两个介词短语？

不懂～～～

作者: mapleflying 时间: 2005-8-15 22:52
then应该包含在怀疑的内容里面，即她怀疑（警方非法录下对话然后用所得信息。。。。），而不是她先怀疑警方（录对话），然后怀疑警方（用所得信息。。。）吧？

作者: gre200011 时间: 2006-3-1 14:16

TMD,到了大全,OG的公理就不灵了,虽然也知道"平行,主谓一致"第一,可是THAT 在OG 里是不省的....鬼知道考试的时候怎么样.

作者: jelly03 时间: 2006-3-1 22:18

我想这里of不能省，主要是因为从动作发出的逻辑主语，从意思上看是the police,所以选D

作者: kathy8446 时间: 2006-7-3 20:06

我想问的是，D里为什么要用过去完成时？既然前一个动作用了现在完成时（of having taped），怎么后面发生的反而又不用了(of using)？然后又用了had obtained？过去的过去吗？但是of using 也不算过去时吧？

作者: abia 时间: 2006-8-15 09:37

20.The lawyer for the defense charged that she suspected the police of having illegally taped her confidential conversations with her client and then used the information obtained to find evidence supporting their murder charges.
(A) used the information obtained to find evidence supporting
(B) used such information as they obtained to find evidence supporting
(C) used the information they had obtained to find evidence that would support
(D) of using the information they had obtained to find evidence that would support
(E) of using such information as they obtained to find evidence that would be supportive of
答案是D。

我来看看这道题啊。tape conversation这个动作一定先于use information as evidence，所以在of 后面作为分词出现的时候必须用到having来表达这个顺序。再说had obtained，整个句子的事态都是过去时，那么很自然先得到了录音才能后来作为证据，用had obtained很正常阿。

另外再说说为什么不能用supporting要用would，如果用supporting就意味着the information they had obtained to find evidence that supported，清楚了吧？就变成呈堂政供啦，要知道非法录音能不能做证据还不知道呢，所以用一个虚拟语气would咯，明白了吧？

[此贴子已经被作者于2006-8-15 9:39:17编辑过]

作者: KarenK 时间: 2006-9-12 20:35

关于evidence supporting 和evience that would suppor

在by的语法全解里

supporting 是说习惯行的行为

that从句是说具体时间下的具体行为

大概这道题也考了这个？

作者: amysarmy 时间: 2006-10-11 23:51

我觉得,如果用used 则和taped平行,这样used 也变成了illegally 了,而事实上.只有taped才能是illegally,而use这个tape(不管是不是illeagally taped)不是非法的.

其次,很同意abia的说法＂另外再说说为什么不能用supporting要用would，如果用supporting就意味着the information they had obtained to find evidence that supported，清楚了吧？就变成呈堂政供啦，要知道非法录音能不能做证据还不知道呢，所以用一个虚拟语气would咯，明白了吧？＂

作者: chncjy 时间: 2008-7-28 16:22

从平衡结构可以排除A B C,但为什么不是E呢?

我觉得D从句中省略了that 好像不对哦

D) ……and then （the police）
of using the information （that they had obtained ）to find evidence that would support……

OG里这种从句的that不是不可以省略的吗？

作者: isi 时间: 2009-6-25 14:20

以下是引用chncjy在2008-7-28 16:22:00的发言：

从平衡结构可以排除A B C,但为什么不是E呢?

我觉得D从句中省略了that 好像不对哦

D) ……and then （the police）
of using the information （that they had obtained ）to find evidence that would support……

OG里这种从句的that不是不可以省略的吗？

定语从句可以省略that

关于分词修饰名词和that定语从句修饰名词的区别很多语法书上都有；

此处必须用that从句修饰information主要原因在于这是一次具体、特定的行为，具体的“abtain”，该行为不具有重复性。

[此贴子已经被作者于2009-6-25 14:22:37编辑过]

作者: mars_cheung 时间: 2009-12-10 23:47
补充一下，这里的 the information （that they had obtained ）定语从句里面省略 that 是由于 information 在定语从句里面做宾语，不然的话 GMAT 是不主张省略 that。
后面马上就是一个例子 ......find evidence that would support……

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)