ChaseDream

标题: [求助]谢谢大家帮我看看这3道语法题目 [打印本页]

作者: smilinglan 时间: 2003-4-5 15:22
标题: [求助]谢谢大家帮我看看这3道语法题目
新东方补充材料，谢谢大家帮助！感激不尽！

154 In 1933 the rubber,clothing,and shipbuilding industries put into effect a six-hour workday,(believing it a seeming perment accomodation rather than a temporary expedient for what many observers thought was
)an economy made overproductive by advances in technology.

C  believing it a was not a temporary expendient but a seeming perment accomodation to what many observers thought of as a

D  not as a temporary expedient but as a seemingly permanent accomodation to what many observers thought was

答案是D

我的疑问：
1，C中如果将seeming 改成seemingly 是不是也是正确答案了呢？
2，D中的what many observers thought was 的结构是怎么样的呢？不知道这里做的什么意思，看来是我对what 用法不熟悉，尤其是这里的was 也不知道为何放在这里。

158 Although it claim to delve into political issues,television can be (superfical such as when each of the three major networks )broadcast exactly the same statement from a political candidate.

C  superfical if the three major networks all

E  superfical,as when the three major networks each
答案是E ，我不明白这里as 是做什么用的呢？另外C为什么不对呢？

157 Temporary-employment agencies benefit not only  from the increasing demand for clerical workers but also (the higer profits made when highly paid professionals are placed ,requests for whom )have increased in the recent wave of corporate takeovers.

C  from the requests for highly paid professionals ,who make higher profits for the agencies when placed and whose requests
D  form highly paid professionals,whose placement makes higher profits for the agencies and whose requests
E  form the higher profits made in placing highly paid professionals,request for whom

答案是E

我搞不清楚这个机构是怎么获利的呢？与not only from 并列的为什么是but also from the higher profits,这个地方我不懂。另外想问一下：E中的request for whom 做什么呢？是不是就相当与highly paid professionals's request 呢？谢谢大家帮我看看！

作者: Robin 时间: 2003-4-5 17:06
154, 如果将seeming 改成seemingly 也是正确答案 (XDF笔记：）

作者: siebel 时间: 2003-4-6 02:24
let me try...

以下是引用smilinglan在2003-4-5 15:22:00的发言：
新东方补充材料，谢谢大家帮助！感激不尽！
154 In 1933 the rubber,clothing,and shipbuilding industries put into effect a six-hour workday,(believing it a seeming perment accomodation rather than a temporary expedient for what many observers thought was
)an economy made overproductive by advances in technology.

C believing it a was not a temporary expendient but a seeming perment accomodation to what many observers thought of as a

D not as a temporary expedient but as a seemingly permanent accomodation to what many observers thought was
答案是D
我的疑问：
1，C中如果将seeming 改成seemingly 是不是也是正确答案了呢？

1. believing没有逻辑主语。
2. 分词短语，一般:
a.伴随结果，不合适。
b.伴随动作，beliving 应该不是一个动作。

2，D中的what many observers thought was 的结构是怎么样的呢？不知道这里做的什么意思，看来是我对what 用法不熟悉，尤其是这里的was 也不知道为何放在这里。

理论而言，应该是以was作谓语的定语从句（嵌套一个小主语从句），修饰expedient. 整理如下：
not as a temporary expedient what many observers thought was but as a seemingly permanent accommodation to an economy made over productive by advances in technology.
整个not as后面的句子，作为6-hour workday的同位语。这也是为什么into effect提前的原因。

158 Although it claim to delve into political issues,television can be (superfical such as when each of the three major networks )broadcast exactly the same statement from a political candidate.

C superfical if the three major networks all

E superfical,as when the three major networks each
答案是E ，我不明白这里as 是做什么用的呢？另外C为什么不对呢？

这句考的是such as 和as 用法上的分别。

such as举例，后面不可跟when从句（白勇的理论）。但是在这道题里，需要这么一个例子来证明television can be superficial。怎么办？用as引导。as作为副词，表“就像，比如”。同样的例子：as above, as before, as usual, as well.

as当然可以作代词，但如白勇所说指代前面整个句子实在费解。更何况，如此的话，as在分句里做什么成份成了问题。

157 Temporary-employment agencies benefit not only  from the increasing demand for clerical workers but also (the higer profits made when highly paid professionals are placed ,requests for whom )have increased in the recent wave of corporate takeovers.
C  from the requests for highly paid professionals ,who make higher profits for the agencies when placed and whose requests
D  form highly paid professionals,whose placement makes higher profits for the agencies and whose requests
E  form the higher profits made in placing highly paid professionals,request for whom
答案是E

我搞不清楚这个机构是怎么获利的呢？与not only from 并列的为什么是but also from the higher profits,这个地方我不懂。另外想问一下：E中的request for whom 做什么呢？是不是就相当与highly paid professionals's request 呢？谢谢大家帮我看看！

1. 从request和专家身上获利似更不可理解。怎么获利的不用去管，直到利润可以带给他们benefit就好。有点像逻辑，不能多想，说啥信啥即可。
2. not only from ... but also from... 对仗工整，有何不妥？
3. requests for who做定语从句，修饰professionals：对这种高薪专家的需求增长了......

作者: 1stzhang 时间: 2003-4-6 10:53
154 In 1933 the rubber,clothing,and shipbuilding industries put into effect a six-hour workday,(believing it a seeming perment accomodation rather than a temporary expedient for what many observers thought was
)an economy made overproductive by advances in technology.

C  believing it a was not a temporary expendient but a seeming perment accomodation to what many observers thought of as a

D  not as a temporary expedient but as a seemingly permanent accomodation to what many observers thought was
划线部分的开头是动词我们就从动词入手，（1）believe的发出者只能是人而原句中根本没有任何表示人的名词和代词（2）it是不能指代一件事的。所以，把seeming改成seemingly也不对。what引导的是一个名词性的从句，不用深究。

158 Although it claim to delve into political issues,television can be (superfical such as when each of the three major networks )broadcast exactly the same statement from a political candidate.

C  superfical if the three major networks all

这个题目从动词broadcast入手可以只留下C和E两个答案。这个时候就必须比较意思，c用了if，E用的是when，一个表示的是推测，而when表示的是陈述。从原文的让步就可以看出，用推测是不好的,尤其主句用的是"can"。as是adv，when是连词从修饰上讲是没有问题的。

157 Temporary-employment agencies benefit not only  from the increasing demand for clerical workers but also (the higer profits made when highly paid professionals are placed ,requests for whom )have increased in the recent wave of corporate takeovers.

C  from the requests for highly paid professionals ,who make higher profits for the agencies when placed and whose requests
D  form highly paid professionals,whose placement makes higher profits for the agencies and whose requests
E  form the higher profits made in placing highly paid professionals,request for whom

此题考的平行结构。但是如果是从此入手我们很难排除，退而求其次动词就从make入手make的发出者是人，d是placement发出的是可以排除的。比较C E,我们再从动词入手看place作为“放置”是及物动词，而C的动词使用是不对的,place后面什么都没有，发出者也不明确。所以，E比较好

[此贴子已经被作者于2003-4-6 11:04:41编辑过]

作者: smilinglan 时间: 2003-4-6 17:44
先感谢Robin，小鹿， 1stzhang 给我的热情回复！待我慢慢看来

作者: smilinglan 时间: 2003-4-6 18:12

154题，咱们大家就有了不同的意见哦。

我这里同意Robin的说法/

以下是引用Robin在2003-4-5 17:06:00的发言：
154, 如果将seeming 改成seemingly 也是正确答案 (XDF笔记：）

因为我认为这里的beileving 做伴随动作，并且这里的动作发出者是the rubber,clothing,and shipbuilding industries 呀，希望咱们再讨论讨论，也希望更多的战友们来发表不同的意见，谢谢大家哦~

作者: smilinglan 时间: 2003-4-6 18:14

以下是引用siebel在2003-4-6 2:24:00的发言：
let me try...

这句考的是such as 和as 用法上的分别。

such as举例，后面不可跟when从句（白勇的理论）。但是在这道题里，需要这么一个例子来证明television can be superficial。怎么办？用as引导。as作为副词，表“就像，比如”。同样的例子：as above, as before, as usual, as well.

as当然可以作代词，但如白勇所说指代前面整个句子实在费解。更何况，如此的话，as在分句里做什么成份成了问题。

小鹿说的很好哦，谢谢你的讲解，我明白了~

作者: 1stzhang 时间: 2003-4-6 18:36
即使认为believe发出者是the rubber,clothing,and shipbuilding industries，那么believe后面也要加上that即believe that it was not ......，单把seeming改为seemingly是依然是不对的。我个人认为用it指带a six-hour workday是不合理的，按照本句的意思它想用it 指代put into effect a six-hour workday，但it 是不能指带一句话的。于是，正确选项放弃使用believe和it，直接使用not as....but as ....这个结构。

作者: smilinglan 时间: 2003-4-6 18:38

以下是引用1stzhang在2003-4-6 10:53:00的发言：
158 Although it claim to delve into political issues,television can be (superfical such as when each of the three major networks )broadcast exactly the same statement from a political candidate.

C superfical if the three major networks all

这个题目从动词broadcast入手可以只留下C和E两个答案。这个时候就必须比较意思，c用了if，E用的是when，一个表示的是推测，而when表示的是陈述。从原文的让步就可以看出，用推测是不好的,尤其主句用的是"can"。as是adv，when是连词从修饰上讲是没有问题

谢谢1stzhang ！经过你的提醒，我想清楚了~
C 中的意思是尽管电视涉及到一些政治观点，但是当3家电台播放来自同一个竞选者的观点时，电视节目可能是肤浅的，言外之意，在很多的情况下电视很透彻的分析了政治事件。我认为这与前面的Although 转折上不太合适。

而E中很好，尽管电视涉及到一些政治观点，但是电视节目可能是肤浅的，比如当3家电台播放来自同一个竞选者的观点时，读起来很通畅也很合理。正如小鹿所说的as 在这里应该是比如，就像的意思。

作者: 温尼熊 时间: 2003-4-6 23:49
154，C中如果将seeming 改成seemingly ，也不对。伴随状语意思含混不清楚。此外，BELIEVEING后的宾语从句没有THAT。
D中的accommodation to what many observers thought was an economy made overproductive by advances in technology，因为是accommodation to,所以后面的成分都应该可以看作一个something，显然这个something就应该是what 引导的一个宾语从句，但是，最可怕的是，这个what 引导的的句子是一个主从复合句，不是一个从句。所以一定要说D对，我只能猜测ETS认为what many observers thought was中的many observers thought只是一个插入成分，句子主干其实是what was an economy made overproductive by advances in technology。但是，这种用法又好象很怪异，尽管似乎也有这种结构。

157，两个FROM引出的是两个并列的利润来源。

E中的request for whom 做什么呢？是不是就相当与highly paid professionals's request 呢？——————————————我觉得你的猜测是正确的。
lanlan，果然厉害。

作者: smilinglan 时间: 2003-4-7 15:12
谢谢快乐的小熊！真是好让人感动啊，一下子就给我打了这么多的字。我明白你是说的意思了！

只是其实154题C 中believing 后面是有that 的，我忘记打上了~可是如果这样，我不太明白的是你说的“伴随状语意思含混不清楚。”我怎么就感觉可以呀，it 指代的是a six-hour workday ，伴随着认为它不是个短暂的代价，而是个长期的适应。还请小熊先生多多指教！

作者: 温尼熊 时间: 2003-4-7 18:08
反正BELIEVING总是不简练。不如D那么直接。
唉。我就是感觉C不爽，说不清了。

作者: smilinglan 时间: 2003-4-7 18:26

以下是引用温尼熊在2003-4-7 18:08:00的发言：
反正BELIEVING总是不简练。不如D那么直接。
唉。我就是感觉C不爽，说不清了。

好的，小熊，不爽咱就不选它！

作者: 温尼熊 时间: 2003-4-8 00:17
我的回复好象不讲道理，呵呵。
但是你体会一下这个感觉，应该是不同的。

作者: mindfree 时间: 2003-4-11 01:25
提醒一句,慎选有it的选项.选择前要看是否有歧义或意思是否明确.

作者: siebel 时间: 2003-4-11 20:46
believe应该是非延续性动词，故believ-ing非常不爽。

作者: michaelcrm 时间: 2010-7-12 15:51

154，C中如果将seeming 改成seemingly ，也不对。伴随状语意思含混不清楚。此外，BELIEVEING后的宾语从句没有THAT。
D中的accommodation to what many observers thought was an economy made overproductive by advances in technology，因为是accommodation to,所以后面的成分都应该可以看作一个something，显然这个something就应该是what 引导的一个宾语从句，但是，最可怕的是，这个what 引导的的句子是一个主从复合句，不是一个从句。所以一定要说D对，我只能猜测ETS认为what many observers thought was中的many observers thought只是一个插入成分，句子主干其实是what was an economy made overproductive by advances in technology。但是，这种用法又好象很怪异，尽管似乎也有这种结构。

-- by 会员温尼熊 (2003/4/6 23:49:00)

这个复杂从句的简化后的结构应为：... to what sb think sth is，其中sb think确实为插入语部分，即使删除也不会影响句子的主要结构。详细一点说，句中的many observers就是sb，而 an economy (made overproductive by advances in technology) 就是 sth. 。考虑到这个sth 很长，因此就把它放在句末而把was 提前，这样更方便阅读。英语中，长句子有时会使用这种位置的变化。

这样应该解释清楚这个句子的结构。

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)