ChaseDream

标题: OG 35 是否有RUN ON 错误? [打印本页]

作者: predator_yl    时间: 2006-4-2 14:44
标题: OG 35 是否有RUN ON 错误?

OG-35:  In June of 1987,The Bridge of Trinquetaille,Vincent van Gogh's view of an iron bridge over the Rhone sold for $20.2 million and it was the second highest price ever paid for a painting at auction
A) Rhone,sold for $20.2 million and it was
B)Rhone,which sold for $20.2 million,was
C)Rhone,was sold for $20.2 million,
D)Rhone was sold for $20.2 million,being
E)Rhone,sold for $20.2 million,and was



A选项中是否有RUN ON错误?请NN指点


作者: carolhide    时间: 2006-4-2 16:05

你可以查询讨论连接里的前人对本题的解释。


作者: predator_yl    时间: 2006-4-2 16:39
查过了,没注意到这题里有关于RUN ON的讨论
作者: carolhide    时间: 2006-4-2 19:52

我去查过了,你的OG题目和别人的不一样呀。A里面没有逗号的。


35.   In June of 1987, The Bridge of Trinquetaille, Vincent van Gogh’s view of an iron bridge over the Rhone sold for $20.2 million and it was the second highest price ever paid for a painting at auction.


(A) Rhone sold for $20.2 million and it was



(B) Rhone, which sold for $20.2 million, was



(C) Rhone, was sold for $20.2 million,



(D) Rhone was sold for $20.2 million, beingC



(E) Rhone, sold for $20.2 million, and was

这样应该看出A的问题了吧。


作者: predator_yl    时间: 2006-4-2 21:08

In June of 1987, The Bridge of Trinquetaille, Vincent van Gogh’s view of an iron bridge over the (A) Rhone sold for $20.2 million and it was the second highest price ever paid for a painting at auction


谢谢carolhide帮贴出正确的题目,A错误是肯定的,只是不明白OG为什么没指出这是RUN ON


按照NN的解释,在从句中,AND前后两个句子都有主语的话,并不是RUN ON,在就A来说,AND连接的应该是两个独立的句子,那么应该是RUN ON 啊?是不是我对RUN ON 的理解还有问题?请NN帮忙指正!


作者: carolhide    时间: 2006-4-3 09:19
以下是引用predator_yl在2006-4-2 21:08:00的发言:

In June of 1987, The Bridge of Trinquetaille, Vincent van Gogh’s view of an iron bridge over the (A) Rhone sold for $20.2 million and it was the second highest price ever paid for a painting at auction


谢谢carolhide帮贴出正确的题目,A错误是肯定的,只是不明白OG为什么没指出这是RUN ON


按照NN的解释,在从句中,AND前后两个句子都有主语的话,并不是RUN ON,在就A来说,AND连接的应该是两个独立的句子,那么应该是RUN ON 啊?是不是我对RUN ON 的理解还有问题?请NN帮忙指正!


这要看整个句子的结构。

首先,如果把 Vincent van Gogh’s view of an iron bridge over the (A) Rhone sold for $20.2 million and it was the second highest price ever paid for a painting at auction作为主句的话,The Bridge of Trinquetaille就作为插入成分,句子的主语就是Vincent van Gogh’s view ,这样后半句的it指代就有问题。

其次,and的前后连接两个句子,那and前后都有主谓,所以没有RUN ON呀。只是逻辑不对了。

分解

Vincent van Gogh’s view(主语) of an iron bridge over the (A) Rhone sold (谓语) for $20.2 million

it(主语) was (谓语)the second highest price ever paid for a painting at auction


作者: tercher    时间: 2006-4-3 14:35
A指代有问题。详见carolhide解释。
作者: xjlv128    时间: 2006-4-3 15:44
run on是指两个独立的句子中间没有连词
作者: predator_yl    时间: 2006-4-3 20:04
以下是引用xjlv128在2006-4-3 15:44:00的发言:
run on是指两个独立的句子中间没有连词

有连词也要有逗号分隔啊


作者: cocomalawi    时间: 2006-4-3 20:33

有连词不一定要分开


作者: cocomalawi    时间: 2006-4-3 20:35
predator_yl



{codestart}<SCRIPT language=javascript type=text/javascript>
document.write (astro(''));
</script>{codeend}



头衔:震撼世界的力量

等级:业余侠客

文章:57

积分:348

门派:无门无派

注册:2006年2月21日




兄弟你什么时候考,交流一下.OK?


QQ.65424877

zhansheng2051(a) 163.com

作者: predator_yl    时间: 2006-4-3 20:47
以下是引用cocomalawi在2006-4-3 20:33:00的发言:

有连词不一定要分开

不同意,在主句中,如果AND的前后都有主语的话,必须有逗号隔开,否则就是RUN ON,在从句中除外
作者: carolhide    时间: 2006-4-4 15:29
以下是引用predator_yl在2006-4-3 20:47:00的发言:
不同意,在主句中,如果AND的前后都有主语的话,必须有逗号隔开,否则就是RUN ON,在从句中除外

你这样说要有依据呀,或者哪本语法书上有这样的规定?


作者: predator_yl    时间: 2006-4-4 18:53
以下是引用carolhide在2006-4-4 15:29:00的发言:


你这样说要有依据呀,或者哪本语法书上有这样的规定?


135. Intar, the oldest Hispanic theater company in New York, has moved away from the Spanish classics and now it draws on the works both of contemporary Hispanic authors who live abroad and of those in the United States.


(A)  now it draws on the works both of contemporary Hispanic authors who live abroad and of


(B)   now draws on the works of contemporary Hispanic authors, both those who live abroad and those who live


(C)  it draws on the works of contemporary Hispanic authors now, both those living abroad and who live


(D)  draws now on the works both of contemporary Hispanic authors living abroad and who are


(E)   draws on the works now of both contemporary Hispanic authors living abroad and those



In choices A and C, it intrudes between the halves of the compound verb has moved... and [now] draws to introduce a new grammatical subject, thereby creating a run-on sentence:


the inclusion of it requires a comma after classics to set off the new independent clause. The placement of now is awkward in C, and the construction living abroad... and who is not parallel in C and D. Misplacement of words creates ambiguity in E: for example, the positioning of both immediately before the phrase describing the authors suggests that there are only two contemporary Hispanic authors living abroad. The logical word placement and parallel phrasing of B, the best choice, resolve such confusions.




作者: predator_yl    时间: 2006-4-4 18:57

263. In A.D. 391. resulting from the destruction of the largest library of the ancient world at Alexandria, later generations lost all but the lliad and Odyssey among Greek epics, most of the poetry of Pindar and Sappho, and dozens of plays by Aeschylus and Euripides.


(A)  resulting from the destruction of the largest library of the ancient world at Alexandria,


(B)   the destroying of the largest library of the ancient world at Alexandria resulted and


(C)  because of the result of the destruction of the library at Alexandria, the largest of the ancient world,


(D)  as a result of the destruction of the library at Alexandria, the largest of the ancient world,


(E)   Alexandria's largest library of the ancient world was destroyed, and the result was


D, the best choice, uses the idiomatic as a result o/and conveys information unambiguously. In A, the phrase that begins resulting from cannot properly modify later genera­tions. The word order of the largest library of the ancient world at Alexandria generates ambiguity: one possible read­ing is that the ancient world was located at Alexandria. Choice B is incorrect. Although an "-ing" verb such as destroying can sometimes act as a noun, in this case the usage is strained. Again, at Alexandria is ambiguous (as in choice A). Choice B also uses resulted ungrammatically and produces a run-on sentence (In A.D. 391, the destroying... resulted and later generations lost). In C, the phrase because of the result of is unidiomatic as well as redundant. The structure of E illogically suggests that there was more than one largest library of the ancient world and that only Alexandria's was destroyed. Furthermore, the result was should instead be the result was that.


作者: carolhide    时间: 2006-4-4 19:38
这上面的例子也没有说明
以下是引用predator_yl在2006-4-3 20:47:00的发言:
不同意,在主句中,如果AND的前后都有主语的话,必须有逗号隔开,否则就是RUN ON,在从句中除外

作者: predator_yl    时间: 2006-4-4 19:56
上面两个例子OG已经解释的那么清楚了,楼上怎么还会觉得没有说明?




欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3