标题: og13 19 [打印本页] 作者: loveeyore 时间: 2016-8-29 17:20 标题: og13 19 A pioneer journalist, Nellie Bly's exploits included circling the globe faster than Jules Verne's fictional Phileas Fogg
A A pioneer journalist, Nellie Bly's exploits included
B The exploits of Nellie Bly, a pioneer journalist, included
C Nellie Bly was a pioneer journalist, included
D Included in the pioneer journalist Nellie Bly's exploits are
E The pioneer journalist's exploits of Nellie Bly included
不是很能理解这里的比较 人和事件比较？ 求解释作者: Fiona09 时间: 2016-8-30 10:48
这题主要考查了同位语，"a pioneer journalist"作为同位语，就近修饰"Nellie Bly"，而"the exploits of Nellie Bly"的核心词是"the exploits"，"of Nellie Bly"是来修饰了“The exploits”，而“The exploits”的谓语动词是“included”。
谢谢呀，作者: loveeyore 时间: 2016-9-9 14:30
引用小蛋糕狂魔的解释，解释的太棒了
2）比较的问题
我觉得这题的关键不在比较对象是否对应上
正确选项： The exploits of Nellie Bly, a pioneer journalist, included circling the globe faster than Jules Verne's fictional Phileas Fogg.
把同位语插入成分 a pioneer journalist丢掉来看句子主干
The exploits of Nellie Bly included circling the globe faster than Jules Verne's fictional Phileas Fogg.
红色是主语，粉色是谓语，蓝色是宾语
句子想说的是exploits包括什么，而后面黄色部分是作为modifier去修饰宾语的，to provide more information，所以重心不在于找比较的counterpart，把它当做一个修饰成分就好，如果非要扣的话，不妨把作为动名词的宾语 circling the globe改为宾语从句看：
The exploits of Nellie Bly included that he circled the globe faster than Jules Verne's fictional Phileas Fogg. (因为这里 globe 和 后面的人名不会造成歧意，所以省略了助动词 did）
