ChaseDream
标题: 快考了, 真题两道, 大家帮忙看看!!! [打印本页]
作者: Xandria 时间: 2005-8-7 10:26
标题: 快考了, 真题两道, 大家帮忙看看!!!
真题两道, 请大家指教
The discovery that Earth’s inner core rotates independently of and more quickly than Earth’s outer layers is responsible for advancing studies of the flow of heat from the inner through the outer planet and of the formation and periodic reversal in direction of Earth’s magnetic field.
- core rotates independently of and more quickly than Earth’s outer layers is responsible for advancing studies of the flow of heat from the inner through the outer planet and of the formation and periodic reversal in direction of Earth’s magnetic field
- core rotates independently of and more quickly than Earth’s outer layers is responsible for advancing studies of how heat from the inner core flows through the outer planet, and the formation and periodic reversal in direction of Earth’s magnetic field
- core rotates independently and more quickly than Earth’s outer layers are responsible for advancing studies of how heat from the inner core flows through the outer planet, and how Earth’s magnetic field forms and the periodic reversal of its direction
- core, rotating independently and more quickly than Earth’s outer layers, are responsible for advancing studies of the flow of heat from the inner through the outer planet, and the formation and periodic reversal in direction of Earth’s magnetic field
- core, rotating independently of and more quickly than Earth’s outer layers, is responsible for advancing studies of the flow of heat from the inner through the outer planet and of how Earth’s magnetic field forms and the periodic reversal of its direction
答案是A, 但是我觉得A的连续of不仅不好, 而且of也容易造成平行歧义, 相比之下B的how引导的名词性从句和名词并列应该更好吧?
In 1850 Lucretia Mott published her Discourse on Women, arguing in a treatise for women to have equal political and legal rights and for changes in the married women’s property laws.
- arguing in a treatise for women to have equal political and legal rights
- arguing in a treatise for equal political and legal rights for women
- a treatise that advocates women’s equal political and legal rights
- a treatise advocating women’s equal political and legal rights
- a treatise that argued for equal political and legal rights for women
答案是E, 但是我觉得E的for会产生平行歧义吧, CDE的同位结构看起来要好些, 但是如果从没有歧义角度, A好像更好?
[此贴子已经被作者于2005-8-8 20:38:24编辑过]
作者: Xandria 时间: 2005-8-7 14:59
NN们呢?
作者: Xandria 时间: 2005-8-8 13:03
我顶!
作者: Xandria 时间: 2005-8-8 20:39
再顶!
作者: lixing 时间: 2005-8-9 08:22
标题: :P
呵呵 不好意思第一题的题干看得不是很懂 independently of这个of是用来干嘛的?
第二道 考查的是同位语跟and连接的平行结构 同位语原则排除AB 然后根据 and后面是for changes 平行对等的原则 选D
作者: lixing 时间: 2005-8-9 08:23
不好意思写错了 是选E
作者: Xandria 时间: 2005-8-9 12:19
我也知道这个考点, 可是E里面的for前面有两个可以平行的, 不会有歧义吗?
作者: a-ga 时间: 2005-8-9 13:22
In 1850 Lucretia Mott published her Discourse on Women, arguing in a treatise for women to have equal political and legal rights and for changes in the married women’s property laws.
- arguing in a treatise for women to have equal political and legal rights
- arguing in a treatise for equal political and legal rights for women
- a treatise that advocates women’s equal political and legal rights
- a treatise advocating women’s equal political and legal rights
- a treatise that argued for equal political and legal rights for women
答案是E, 但是我觉得E的for会产生平行歧义吧, CDE的同位结构看起来要好些, 但是如果从没有歧义角度, A好像更好?==>我覺得E裡的後面那個for是表目的...而且and後面讀起來就是很明顯的(argue) for change in...也就是說a treatise總共argue了二個點..我個人認為不會有歧意.大家在討論!!
作者: zhoushao 时间: 2005-8-9 13:33
我同意这两题的答案
因为第一题中B若用how与后面的就不平行了,要么后面也用of how。。,
第二题我觉得楼上的MM说的也很有道理,我认为没有歧异
open to discuss
作者: Xandria 时间: 2005-8-9 16:30
查了些语法资料, 明白了.
of后面只能加名词, of how应该是不可以的.
另外to 楼上MM, 名词性从句和名词性的词组是可以平行的.
[此贴子已经被作者于2005-8-9 16:32:09编辑过]
作者: wwwhahchn 时间: 2005-8-9 17:01
同意你说的“名词性从句和名词性的词组是可以平行的”,但是这种平行只是在某些情况下别无选择的时候才成立;和“n.词组 and n.词组”这样的平行比起来,从句和词组的平行就要逊色的多
这两题选A、E,没问题
欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) |
Powered by Discuz! X3.3 |