请教一道reasoning的题目，一直很迷惑， 万分感谢！！

melenghayday

请教一道reasoning的题目，麻烦大家看看哈：

A work of architecture, if it is to be both inviting and functional for public use, must be unobstrusive, taking second place to the total environment. Mordern architects, plagued by egoism, have violated this precept. They have let their strong personalities take over their work, producing buildings that are not functional for public use.

Which one of the statements below follows logicaly from the statements in the passage?

A. Unobstrusive architecture is both inviting and functional.
B. Modern architects who let their strong personalities take over their work produce buildings that are not unobstrusive.
C. An architect with strong personality cannot produce buildings that function well for public use.
D. A work of architecture that takes second place to the environment functions well for public use.
E. A work of architecture cannot simultaneously express its architect's personality and be functional for public use.

正确答案是选B.
我不太明白，A和B推出C，所以A和非B推出非C吗？
那比如我说： 甲是男人并且甲有两只眼睛，推出甲是正常人。那么甲不是男人并且甲有两只眼睛，就推出甲不是正常人吗？

麻烦各位帮我讲解一下吧 多谢多谢！

channingdance

楼主，原文第一句是a到b到c，然后非c到非a,少了非b。a是both inviting and function，b是unobstrusive，c 是taking second。
不知道我解释清楚了没有。

nyx0313

不明白你在说啥 这道题很直接呀

unobtrusive--> taking second place to the total environment

let their strong personalities take over their work= NOT taking second place to the total environment --> NOT unobtrusive

melenghayday

谢谢啦 明白了