Talking about modern cities, New York, London, and Paris are representatives of today’s big cities. People are fond of big cities where they can shop, go to bar and have an easier life. Urbanization also becomes an important indicator of the economic level of countries. It seems that the rapid growth of cities brings an abundance of benefits to people and nearly no disadvantages. However, I think that the negative effects brought by the speedy development of cities nowadays outweigh the positive development. 平行的问题 前后都是effects才行。
The first and most direct effect is that the development of cities does harm to the environment. More and more people flock into cities making the cities too crowded. As a result, cities have to extend to hold such a plenty of people. Trees are cut and farmlands are ruined to build roads, houses, supermarkets, etc. Therefore, vegetation rate decreases leaving the earth with a growing number of carbon oxides. What’s more, factories are built in the process of the growth of cities, bringing in a huge quantity of pollution. North China today is a good example. Thick fog and haze covers the north China for a long time. Some schools are even suspended for the air quality is so poor that it is harm to student’s health. Even my family is influenced by it. My father usually runs in the park in mornings. My mother asks him not to do morning exercise any more since the air is polluted too heavily. But he thinks that it does not matter that much. Several days before, he feels not comfortable and went to see the doctor. The doctor said it was because of the air and suggested him do exercise indoor. People's health is the most important thing. If people's health is influenced heavily by the polluted environment which is due to the development of the rapid growth of cities, it is not fair to say that the growth of cities brings us mostly positive development. (结尾的时候,要写一下自己举得例子和题目的关联性在哪里。兔子兄原谅我又写这么长的句子。。。我很努力想了想,但是写不短啊。)
Apart from polluting environment, the rapid growth of cities decreased people's happiness, although it brings people more material life.(不知道是不是个人的偏好,老师说要有一个句子前后链接两个观点,不能就直接开始一个新的段落,对她说的这一点,我有所保留。) The growth of cities offers people many opportunities to make money. However, more money does not mean happier. People are busy all day long. They work in industries, supermarkets, office, etc.(不知道是因为我的老师逻辑太好还是怎么样,她问我人们在哪儿busy busy干嘛 然后我就说office啊,她说或者可以supermarket啊 因为这样就跟你前文的supermarlet链接起来了啊) They don't spend too much time at home. Therefore, after several years, they are too busy even to say hello to their neighbors.(之前写的句子跳跃性太强,她让我加一些话作为链接) A typical example is my sister. She knows no neighbor. When she has to shop, I always have to take an hour subway to come to her house to babysit her daughter sometimes just for a few hours. Compare this life experience with the life experience in the country, it is easy to tell that even people living in the country don't have more money, they live a happier life. I lived with my grandmother in the country, when I was a little girl. When my grandmother was busy, neighbors always invited me to have meals with them and took care of me. It seemed that everyone knew everyone. Once a family needed help, all others would try to give a hand. As we can see, we can not gain more happiness in the rapid growth of cities. It is not convincing to say the growth brings mostly positive develoment.
It is true that the rapid growth of cities makes people richer and makes our lives easier. The main purpose of developing cities is trying to improve all aspects of people's lives. However, if people’s health and happiness suffer a lot from this process, it could not claim that the rapid growth of cities is a mostly positive development for our society.
1.外国人的逻辑真的很强大。我第一段说的是外国的城市,但是后面提到的是中国的城市。老师说这样逻辑不好。
2.rich life指的不仅仅是物质丰富还有这个人对他的生存状态满足。原话是“happy with what you already have”
3. 第三段改写比较严重,因为老师说了一个“old to new”的问题。我试着解释一下,也就是说A IS B. B IS c 前一句话说的内容,后一句话要重复一下,再引出新的内容C。 总之整篇文章的一个点,要有另一个点在文章的某个地方相呼应。
好累啊。。。。。。兔子兄不知道说清楚没。。你帮我看了两天的作文,我真的好感动,这些主要都是敲给你看的!
|