Part II:Speed
Do you want the good news or the bad news first?
by Bethany Brookshire 12:02pm, November 14, 2013
[Time 2]
“So, there’s good news and bad news.”
An opening like that will send a chill through your veins, no matter what the topic. It’s especially worrying when coming from a significant other or a doctor. And the statement is often followed by a question: Which do you want first, the good news or the bad news? A new study says that you probably want the bad news first. But it also finds that, if the decision is left to the news deliverer, you can’t always get what you want.
Psychologists Angela Legg and Kate Sweeny from the University of California, Riverside decided to answer this age-old question, and to see whether the person giving the news wanted to give the good news or the bad news first. Finally, they looked at how the order that the information is delivered might change how people feel about the news. Their results were published November 4 in the Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin.
The scientists had 121 college students come into the lab in pairs. The researchers assigned each pair a news-giver and a news-recipient. The students did not know their partner beforehand. All students took a personality test designed to assess the Big Five personality dimensions: conscientiousness, extraversion, agreeableness, neuroticism and openness. A few minutes later, an experimenter came in and told the students that their tests were scored, and that there was both good news and bad news. For example, a student might have tested really high on leadership but turned out to look very selfish indeed.
[256 words]
[Time 3]
In reality, the tests had not been scored, and the students wouldn’t end up getting the real good news or bad news. They just had to pick which one they wanted first. For the news-receivers, the experimenter asked which they would like to receive first, and why. Their only job was to receive news. For the news-givers, the experimenter told them they would have to deliver the results of a personality test, and news-givers were asked which they would like to give first, and why.
Using separate groups of students in a new test, the experimenters then actually gave people the results of their personality tests with good news or bad news first, and asked how worried they were as the test went on. They also tested whether telling the news-givers to think of the other person’s feelings altered the order which in they wanted to give the news.
And we really do like to get the bad news first. A whopping 78 percent of students tested said that they wanted the bad news first, thanks. This is consistent with previous studies, which also showed that people would rather get bad news first. But however much you want it, you might not get it: 54 to 68 percent of news-givers preferred to give good news first. When the news-givers were prompted to feel empathy for the receiver with statements like “put yourself in the receiver’s shoes,” the percentage who wanted to give the bad news first increased, but the effects weren’t very large (though they were statistically significant). You want the bad news first, but they don’t want to give it to you.
[273 words]
[Time 4]
But does getting the bad news first make a difference? Legg and Sweeney had a third group of students get either good news first or bad news first, and assessed how worried they were before and after they’d gotten the news. Both groups showed increased worry, no matter what order the news came in. But it turns out a bitter pill is easier to sweeten: Students who received the bad news first ended up less worried than those who received the good news first.
So maybe bad news first is the way to go. The authors believe that the findings could be generalized to many different types of bad news, used by doctors or your soon-to-be-ex.
I’m not so sure about that myself. After all, receiving news that you’re kind of a selfish jerk on a personality test is one kind of news. Hearing you might have cancer is entirely another. And does it change when the news affects, say, your community or something impersonal? Does it change when it’s news that you can do something about? After all, you can develop leadership skills or practice playing well with others. But some types of bad news are completely beyond your control.
In addition, in all of these cases, the students were put in pairs. They did not know each other beforehand. How does that change the way you give or receive information? Do you want it in another order if you receive it from someone you know and trust, or who is in a position you respect, like a doctor?
I’m also curious to know why we want the bad news first. I’ve always been told that you should take the bad news first. Get it over with, pull the Band-Aid off quick. Do I believe that just because that’s what I’ve been told? It’s an interesting question and one that this study couldn’t really get at. A study for another time.
[322 words]
Source: Science News
https://www.sciencenews.org/blog/scicurious/do-you-want-good-news-or-bad-news-first
Bacteria may transfer mom's stress to fetus
by Laura Sanders 8:05am, November 13, 2013
Expecting mice under pressure passed altered microbes to their pups, affecting the babies’ brains [Time5]
SAN DIEGO — When stress during pregnancy disrupts a growing baby’s brain, blame bacteria. Microbes take part in an elaborate chain reaction, a new study finds: First, stress changes the populations of bacteria dwelling in a pregnant mouse’s vagina; those changes then affect which bacteria colonize a newborn pup’s gut; and the altered gut bacteria change the newborn’s brain.
The research, presented at the annual Society for Neuroscience meeting, may help explain how a stressful environment early in life can make a person more susceptible to disorders such as autism or schizophrenia. The finding also highlights the important and still mysterious ways that the bacteria living in bodies can influence the brain.
“This is really fascinating and promising work,” said neuroscientist Cory Burghy of the University of Wisconsin–Madison. “I am excited to take a look at how these systems interact in humans,” she said.
Stress during pregnancy dramatically shifts the mix of bacteria that dwell in the vagina, Christopher Howerton of the University of Pennsylvania reported November 11. The alarming odor of foxes, loud noise, physical restraints and other stressful situations during a mouse’s pregnancy changed the composition of its vaginal bacteria, he and his colleagues found.
The population of helpful Lactobacillus bacteria, for instance, decreased after stress. And because newborn mouse pups populate their guts with bacteria dwelling in their mother’s birth canal, microbes from mom colonize the baby’s gut. Mice born to moms with lower levels of Lactobacillus in the vagina had lower levels of Lactobacillus in their guts soon after they were born, the team reported.
Lower levels of Lactobacillus in the newborn mice seem to influence the brain, Howerton reported. Genes in a brain region called the hypothalamus behaved differently in mice with low levels of Lactobacillus in their guts.
[295 words]
[Time6]
Those results make sense, said neuroscientist Jane Foster of McMaster University in Hamilton, Ontario. Previous studies have shown that stress can influence the bacteria in human bodies, she said, and in turn these bacteria also influence how a person’s body and brain respond to stress. “It is exciting that neuroscientists are starting to pay attention to this important area of research,” Foster said.
It’s not clear how the bacteria in newborn mice’s guts influence their brains, but the researchers have some hints: Levels of some key chemicals important for brain development were different in mice born to stressed mothers, the researchers found, an effect that could come from altered nutrient absorption in the gut. Another possibility is that stress changes the mix of bacteria in the vagina by shifting the levels of immune cells, allowing more dangerous bacteria to slip in and ultimately make it into the baby, edging out the friendly Lactobacillus, Howerton said.
The complex chain of events outlined in the new study — from stress to mom’s vaginal bacteria to baby’s gut bacteria to baby’s brain — might help explain how stress early in life, perhaps even during gestation, can make a person more vulnerable to psychiatric disorders later, said study coauthor Tracy Bale of the University of Pennsylvania. “Every neuropsychiatric disorder, without exception, is influenced by stress,” she said. Figuring out how stress becomes dangerous might ultimately help scientists identify who is at risk, and how to prevent the ill effects of stress.
So far, the work has been restricted to mice, but Bale and her colleagues plan to study the effects of stress on bacteria in pregnant women and their newborn babies.
[275 words]
Source: Science News
https://www.sciencenews.org/article/bacteria-may-transfer-moms-stress-fetus
|