ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 3699|回复: 4
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[issue] 今天机经习作 issue 73

[精华] [复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2012-4-21 21:37:13 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
Issue 73

题目:Colleges and universities should require all faculty to spend time working outside the academic world in professions relevant to the courses they teach.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.

361字  2930

As is asserted in the topic, faculty should be required to work outside the academic world and turn to the courses they teach. Considering the responsibility of the colleges and the universitiesand also the complexity of the circumstances of the problem, I think the assertion might be valid in some cases but limited if it is require in all the universities and colleges.

Admittedly, faculty in the universities and colleges, should take the responsibility to impart courses to the students. Faculty, rich in the experience of researching and the new theory in the world, would benefits the students' knowledges and even their views to the science. Furthermore, when turn to teaching, the faculty are likely to find out the sections which are nebulous and even goes against the new theory in the text book,  and the text book which students use to study could be corrected immediately. Moreover, faculty could get the idea from the students who are innovative, which would be helpful in their researching.

However, the recommendation in the topic might, moe or less ,goes against the main responsibility of the colleges and universities. Universities, as we all know, are institutions mainly for researching for the unknown fields and thus propel the development of the science and the society in order to benefit the human beings, but not for only teaching their students. If the faculty are forced to spend time in teaching, the time they spend on researching would be decreased as a result. And as a consequence, the development of the science and society would become slow. Comparing the decline in the researching area and the benefits in the teaching, it is hard to say that the recommendation is worthwhile.  

In addition, whether the recommendation in the topic is feasible in all the academic areas is questionable.While it is possible and feasible to ask the faculty who are major in science to impart the courses, it is infeasible to let the faculty in philosophy or other literature subjects to find a work outside the academic area.

In conclusion, although the recommendation that universities and colleges should ask their faculty to work outside the academic area seems to be valid, but in many cases, whether the recommendation is feasible and whether it is worth to do so should be discussed.
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2012-4-23 10:12:57 | 只看该作者
谢谢分享!!
板凳
发表于 2012-4-23 20:18:08 | 只看该作者
第三段偏了  If the faculty are forced to spend time in teaching, the time they spend on researching would be decreased as a result.不是教学和科研的关系
地板
发表于 2012-4-24 23:24:12 | 只看该作者
我也觉得偏了。不过还是感谢分享!
5#
 楼主| 发表于 2012-4-28 21:16:18 | 只看该作者
嗯 我也发现了。。。应该是工业界
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-5-2 06:54
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部