ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 73339|回复: 135
打印 上一主题 下一主题

SDCAR2010【逻辑入门】(二)More about Argument Components

[精华]   [复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2011-6-11 02:59:42 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
Intermediate Conclusions

Sometimes an argument has more than one conclusion. The following is an example:

Because Ming Li went to PekingUniversity, he is smart. Therefore, he is likely to get a high score in GMAT.

The first thing you would notice is that there are two indicators in the above argument – because and therefore. The former leads to a premise and the latter, a conclusion. Secondly, the first sentence is an argument by itself since it contains both a premise (Because Ming Li went to Peking University) and a conclusion (he is smart). Thirdly, the conclusion (he is smart) of the first argument is used to support the second sentence, which is the main conclusion. To put it another way, the clause “he is smart” is both a conclusion (in the 1st sentence) and a premise (in the overall argument.)

In CR tests, a dual-role clause like this is called an “intermediate” or “subsidiary” conclusion. It is not the main point of the overall argument, but it is still a conclusion.

Keep in mind that you have to find the main conclusion of an argument in CR test. Do not be fooled by an intermediate conclusion along the way. Use the “because” test if in doubt.

Background Information

Some CR questions are not pure arguments. They might also include background information, which, by definition, helps you understand the flow of the argument, but does not contain a premise or a conclusion.

For example, an opinion of a critic or a committee is common in background information:

Editor: Many graduates from Peking University believe they can easily land a white-collar job after graduation. But they are wrong. A survey between 2000 and 2010 shows that more than 10% of Peking University Graduates during the last decade have no job offers within 6 months of their graduation.

The first sentence is neither a premise nor a conclusion. It is the opinion of “many graduates from Peking University.” The editor gives us this opinion to help us understand what he is trying to establish in his own conclusion (in the 2nd sentence) – that these graduates are wrong. In other words, he is arguing that a graduate from Peking University is NOT getting a job offer easily. The editor then buttresses his conclusion by citing a survey as the premise for his main conclusion.

A common pattern for such an argument is:
1) Opinion of someone else
2) The author’s conclusion (usually introduced with words such as but or however to highlight the contrast)
3) Premise(s) to support the author’s conclusion

As to examples of such opinions:





    Many scholars believe that . . .

    A few committee members argue that . . .

    The defendant claimed that . . .

    The classical theory holds that . . .

    Hui’s recent research found that. . .

    Most CDers voted [the posts by Zeros as their favorites]

All the above phrases telegraph to you that someone or some groups or some theories have such opinions or predictions. These phrases often end with the word that, but they do not have to. More often than not, they also start with some qualifiers, such as some, many, most, or all.

After the 1st sentence stating an opinion, the author is probably going to follow up with his or her own conclusion. And the author’s conclusion will usually contradict the opinion stated in the 1st sentence. Accordingly, we can call the 1st opinion “opposing viewpoint.”

Other phrases which introduce opinions of people other than the author are:





    It is commonly assumed that . . .

    It is very documented that . . .

    It is widely agreed that . . .

These phrases are kind of hard to pick up since they do not mention any one person.

Hidden Premises

In certain arguments, one of the premises might be hidden in unusual places of the argument. Look at the following example:
Ming Li is smarter than Ying Zhang. Therefore, because smarter people earn more money, Ming earns more money than Ying.

The first sentence is a premise. The second sentence put two signal words therefore and because together. As a result, the second premise (smarter people earn more money) is hidden because test takers often treat everything after the indicator therefore as a conclusion.

Whenever the test makers put a premise in the middle of a sentence, they offset it with commas. Everything between the two commas is a premise. Examples are:





    Therefore, because premise X, conclusion Y.

    Thus, since premise X, conclusion Y.

    So, due to premise X, conclusion Y.

    Accordingly, given that premise X, conclusion Y.

In all of the above examples, the conclusion introduce by the signal words comes at the very end of the sentence.

Concessions

To make an argument stronger, a good advocate or debater or writer would concede a weakness of his or her viewpoints to show that they understand the big picture and to preempt a counterargument, if any, from their critics. For example:

Although a very high GPA might not guarantee an offer from a top MBA program, you should aim to get a GPA as high as possible in college if you want to enroll in a MBA program. A high GPA in college is something an admission committee advisor would like to see in the incoming MBA students.

The conclusion (you should aim to get a GPA as high as possible in college) is supported by the premise (A high GPA in college is something an admission committee advisor would like to see in the incoming MBA students.) But as you might have noticed, the first clause (very high GPA might not guarantee an offer from a top MBA program) actually hurts the argument. It is one reason you should NOT aim to get a high GPA in college. The author concedes this point to preempt one objection a critic might raise, such as “a high GPA only indicates book-smart” or “many candidates with high GPA get rejections from top MBA programs.” He is saying “I know high GPA is not sufficient, but it might be necessary. So I still think you should get a high GPA.” This evidence, in his mind, still outweighs the counter evidence a critic might proclaim.

Concessions are often introduced by although, even though, but, however, yet and despite.

SDCAR2010【逻辑入门】(一)Arguments
SDCAR2010【逻辑入门】(三)Main Point
收藏收藏58 收藏收藏58
沙发
发表于 2011-6-11 08:47:13 | 只看该作者
支持一下,慢慢看,谢谢SDCAR2010

要是能写份中文的就更好了,看了你前一个帖子知道为什么不用中文了。 :)
板凳
发表于 2011-6-11 13:20:32 | 只看该作者
恩一开始特别不适应,尤其是sdcar解答数学题时,就想第一时间弄明白题,一看英文就会烦。不过现在慢慢适应了,要逼着自己用英文的思维去想。。。
地板
发表于 2011-6-11 15:27:28 | 只看该作者
顶!~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
5#
发表于 2011-6-11 18:28:13 | 只看该作者
强大的贴!理解中~~
6#
发表于 2011-6-12 15:12:13 | 只看该作者
sdcar2010很强大。太受用了,系统得可以与Manhattan堪比
7#
发表于 2011-6-12 17:31:52 | 只看该作者
跟~~


几种结构,常来读!
8#
发表于 2011-6-13 11:38:14 | 只看该作者
英文的很好啊!看SD牛牛写英文也是一种学习啊~~赞!思路好棒!
9#
发表于 2011-6-18 15:50:29 | 只看该作者
用英文的真的很好~出国不就是天天要对着英文来看吗?现在要逼着自己适应!
10#
发表于 2011-6-19 08:52:00 | 只看该作者
i am learning
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-15 21:28
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部