12.22 北美下午场Q49 V30 放狗

白色的乌鸦

今天下午3点考的 我想想都有些啥作文新的
说的是一家手机制造商打算买很多金属材料屯着
因为1. 这些材料的价一会长一会跌
       2. 一个forcast说这个手机的市场在未来几年都还会增长

数学
1+x+y+xy=15 问x+y等于多少
选的6（1+2+4+8=15）
选项3 5 6 8 还有一个记不得了

有一道题我瞎蒙的但是现在想起来其实应该蛮简单的给了一个一次函数的图像
然后给了函数跟x 和y 的交点 让你选函数 记得一个点是（-4,0）
但是选项函数的样子写的是x=ay+b  我当时一时蒙逼没做出来直接过了

求（xy^2）^3/（yx^2）^3等于多少 化简就是X^3=y^3
1. x的绝对值=y的绝对值
2.y/x=x/y
两个条件是一样的 我选的E

cost=0.01x^2+AX+b 问X=20 COST？ 这里的x代表units
1. X=11 的cost 比 x=10的cost 多A(一个数）
2. x=10 的时候cost 是多少
答案失忆

公司要在一个department里面选人然后问选到这个department里面的manager的几率是多少
1.有3 manages in the department
2.5%的人在这个department里面是manager

3x>7y么
1.失忆 算不出来
2. 可以算出来2.5x>7y

100A+10B+2 能被4整除么
条件失忆


阅读中了3篇
俄国毛子研究达尔文那个
英国trademark law
还有一篇啥我都记不住了。。
没中的那篇我没看 太长了又5段 直接跳了

逻辑失忆
语法失忆
想起来啥我会再来补的
祝大家杀鸡成功
以上

相叶忍

四十五、政治家应对环境问题

【本月原始】by fearless123的群里的大神
5段，讲政治讲可以从世界各个企业那里借鉴，如何应对环境变化。然后2 3段时举了7 8 个国家的某公司如何应对的， 有的是水资源短缺，就用空气发动代替水发动，有的和其他机构形成联盟，还有的先降低价格对低收入者扩展市场等等，这个有题问哪个策略不是他们用的。然后第4段说有学者批判，没考题就忘了怎么批判的。第5段作者又说，虽然怎么样怎么样但是上面的一系列还是为我们提供了一种新的思路

【考古16.6.16】

Green growth
——Someemerging-world companies are combining growth with greenery
THE enrichment of previously poor countries isthe most inspiring development of our time. It is also worrying. Theenvironment is already under strain. What will happen when the globalpopulation rises from 7 billion today to 9.3 billion in 2050, as demographersexpect, and a growing proportion of these people can afford goods that wereonce reserved for the elite? Can the planet support so much economic activity?

Many policymakers adopt a top-down andWestern-centric approach to such planetary problems. They discuss ambitiousregulations in global forums, or look to giant multinationals and well-heeledNGOs to set an example. But since most people live in the emerging world, itmakes sense to look at what successful companies there are doing to make growthmore sustainable.

A new study by the World Economic Forum (WEF)and the Boston Consulting Group (BCG) identifies 16 emerging-market firms thatthey say are turning eco-consciousness into a source of competitive advantage.These highly profitable companies (which the study dubs “the new sustainabilitychampions”) are using greenery to reduce costs, motivate workers and forgerelationships. Their home-grown ideas will probably be easier for their peersto copy than anything cooked up in the West.

The most salient quality of these companies isthat they turn limitations (of resources, labour and infrastructure) intoopportunities. Thus, India's Shree Cement, which has long suffered from watershortages, developed the world's most water-efficient method for making cement,in part by using air-cooling rather than water-cooling. Manila Water, a utilityin the Philippines, reduced the amount of water it was losing, through wastageand illegal tapping, from 63% in 1997 to 12% in 2010 by making water affordablefor the poor. Broad Group, a Chinese maker of air conditioners, taps the wasteheat from buildings to power its machines. Zhangzidao Fishery Group, a Chineseaquaculture company, recycles uneaten fish feed to fertilise crops.

Setting green goals is a common practice.Sekem, an Egyptian food producer, set itself the task of reclaiming desert landthrough organic farming. Florida Ice & Farm, a Costa Rican food and drinkcompany, has adopted exacting standards for the amount of water it can consumein producing drinks.

These firms measure themselves by theirgreenery, too. Florida Ice & Farm, for example, links 60% of its boss's payto the triple bottom line of “people, planet and profit”. The sustainabilitychampions also encourage their workers to come up with green ideas. Natura, aBrazilian cosmetics company, gives bonuses to staff who find ways to reduce thefirm's impact on the environment. Masisa, a Chilean forestry company, invitesemployees to “imagine unimaginable businesses” aimed at poorer consumers.Woolworths, a South African retailer, claims that many of its best green ideashave come from staff, not bosses.

In emerging markets it is hard for companiesto stick to one specialism, because they have to worry about so many widerproblems, from lousy infrastructure to unreliable supply chains. So thesustainability champions seek to shape the business environment in which theyoperate. They lobby regulators: Grupo Balbo, a Brazilian organic-sugarproducer, is working with the Brazilian government to establish a certificationsystem for organic products. They form partnerships with governments and NGOs.Kenya's Equity Bank has formed an alliance with groups such as TheInternational Fund for Agricultural Development to reduce its risks whenlending to smallholders. Natura has worked with its suppliers to producesustainable packaging, including a new “green” plastic derived from sugar cane.

The firms also work hard to reach and educatepoor consumers, often sacrificing short-term profits to create future markets.Masisa organises local carpenters into networks and connects them to low-incomefurniture buyers. Broad Group has developed a miniature device for measuring airpollution that can fit into mobile phones. Jain Irrigation, an Indian maker ofirrigation systems, uses dance and song to explain the benefits of dripirrigation to farmers who can't read. Suntech, a Chinese solar-power company,has established a low-carbon museum to celebrate ways of reducingcarbon-dioxide emissions.

Richbecause green, or green because rich?

One could quibble with BCG's analysis. PhilRosenzweig of Switzerland's IMD business school has argued that managementwriters are prone to “the halo effect”: they treat the temporary success of acompany as proof that it has discovered some eternal principle of goodmanagement. The fact that some successful companies have embraced greenery doesnot prove that greenery makes a firm successful. Some firms, having prospered,find they can afford to splurge on greenery. Some successful firms pursuegreenery for public-relations purposes. And for every sustainable emergingchampion, there are surely 100 firms that have prospered by belching fumes intothe air or pumping toxins into rivers, as a visit to China or India will showonly too vividly.

Nonetheless, the central message of theWEF-BCG study—that some of the best emerging-world companies are combiningprofits with greenery—is thought-provoking. Many critics of environmentalismargue that it is a rich-world luxury: that the poor need adequate food beforethey need super-clean air. Some even see greenery as a rich-world conspiracy:the West grew rich by industrialising (and polluting), but now wants to stopthe rest of the world from following suit. The WEF-BCG report demonstrates thatsuch fears are overblown. Emerging-world companies can be just as green astheir Western rivals. Many have found that, when natural resources are scarceand consumers are cash-strapped, greenery can be a lucrative business strategy.

翻译：
我们身处的这个时代最激动人心的进步乃是前贫穷国家的经济发展。而这令人忧虑。环境早已不堪重负。当全球总人口从今天的70亿上升至人口统计家所预估的2050年的93亿，并且越来越多的人有钱购置一度为上流人士储备的商品之时，世界会成何样呢？地球能够承担如此繁重的经济活动吗？

许多决策者们建议采纳一个自上而下并以西方为中心的方法来解决此类问题。他们在全球论坛中雄心勃勃地探讨监管制度，或指望大型跨国公司和富有的非政府组织来树立典范。但鉴于大多数人生活在发展中国家，故而有必要了解这些国家的成功企业为促进可持续增长而做了些什么。

世界经济论坛和波士顿咨询公司的一项最新研究显示，16个发展中国家的企业认为它们将生态意识转换为一种具有竞争性的优势资源。这些高盈利企业（即这项研究中的“新型可持续发展领头羊”）利用环保来降低成本，激励员工，建立关系网。它们的本土思维有可能更容易让同行复制而不是去效仿欧美。

这些企业最显著的特点是将资源、劳动力、设备的不足化为机遇。印度公司Shree Cement，曾长期面临水资源短缺的困扰，通过使用空气冷却而不是水冷却的方法，研制出世界最高效的用水系统来生产水泥。菲律宾一家公用事业公司Manila Water，因浪费和非法开采而导致的用水量流失，让穷人用得起水，将这一流失比例从1997年的63%降低至2010年的12%。中国的空调制造商远大集团，利用建筑散发的废热为机器提供动力；大连的海洋食品企业獐子岛渔业集团，重复利用剩鱼来肥沃庄稼。

设定绿色目标是惯例。埃及食品生产商Sekem制定以有机种植来改造沙漠的任务。哥斯达黎加食品饮料公司Florida Ice& Farm在生产饮料过程中采纳严苛的耗水量标准。

这些企业还通过环保事业来衡量自身价值。比如，Florida Ice & Farm把老板60%的薪水与“人、地球、利润”三条底线挂钩。同时，这只“新型可持续发展领头羊”还鼓励员工提出绿色点子。巴西一家化妆品企业Natura分发奖励给员工，让他们找到降低企业对环境造成破坏的方法。智利一家林业企业Masisa，动员其职工开动脑筋，想出各种稀奇古怪的业务方式吸引相对拮据的客户。南非一家零售商Woolworths称，公司很多最佳环保点子来自员工而不是老板。

在新型经济体中，企业似乎很难坚守一种专长，因为它们还得担忧如令人讨厌的基础设施和不可信赖的供应链等诸多大问题。因此，领头羊们力求塑造业已掌控的经济环境。它们向监管机构游说，如巴西的有机糖生产商Grupo Balbo和巴西政府合作，以建立有机产品的认证体系，它们还同各级政府和非政府组织建立关系；肯尼亚的Equity Bank与国际农业发展基金等组织构建联盟关系，来降低小佃农的贷款风险。Natura与其供应商合作，生产可持续包装袋，其中包括从甘蔗中提炼出来的新“绿色“垃圾袋。

这些企业还努力接触和教育贫苦消费者，时常为了开拓未来市场而牺牲短期利益。Masisa组织当地的工匠建立关系网，使他们和低收入的家俱买家间保持联系。远大集团给空调装上用来衡量空气污染的小型设备，可嵌入到手机里面。印度的灌溉系统制造商Jain Irrigation用舞蹈和音乐向那些不识字的农民解释滴管的好处。中国的太阳能企业尚德，建立了一家低碳博物馆，以宣传减二氧化碳碳排放的各种途径。

绿富抑或富绿？

有人对波士顿咨询公司的这份分析颇有异议。瑞士IMD商学院的Phil Rosenzweig就认为，管理作家倾向于“光环效应”：他们把企业短暂的成功用来证明其发现了优良管理的永恒法宝。一些成功企业支持环保事业的事实无法证明环保事业可以使企业获得成功。一些具有前景的企业认为它们有钱玩环保。还一些企业基于公共关系追求环保事业。至于这些“可持续发展领跑者”，可以肯定有100家企业是通过排放废气或有毒污水来壮大的。去中国或印度看看，那种场景再形象不过了。

不管怎样，世界经济论坛和波士顿咨询公司的这份研究的主旨---发展中国家中最好的一些企业将环保与盈利结合---令人深思。许多环保主义批评者认为这只是发达国家的奢侈品：穷人需要超洁空气之前要先解决温饱问题。甚至有些人将环保事业看作是发达国家的阴谋：西方通过工业化和污染致富，但现在却想要阻止不发达国家走同样的路线。该研究表明这些担忧被夸大了。发展中国家的企业也可以和西方的竞争者一样追求绿色。很多人早就发现，当自然资源日益短缺且消费者捉襟见肘的时候，环保事业不失为一项有利可图的商业策略。

翻译总结（by 小米新新）发展中国的成功企业为促进可持续增长而做了些什么。
BCG 显示：16 个发展中国家的企业认为它们将生态意识转换为一种具有竞争性的优势资源。这些企业最显著的特点是将资源、劳动力、设备的不足化为机遇;这些企业还通过环保事业来衡量自身价值;因此，领头羊们力求塑造业已掌控的经济环境。它们向监管机构游说;这些企业还努力接触和教育贫苦消费者
BUT,有人对波士顿咨询公司的这份分析颇有异议,管理作家倾向于“光环效应”：他们把企业短暂的成功用来证明其发现了优良管理的永恒法宝。一些成功企业支持环保事业的事实无法证明环保事业可以使企业获得成功。一些具有前景的企业认为它们有钱玩环保。还一些企业基于公共关系追求环保事业。不管怎样，世界经济论坛和波士顿咨询公司的这份研究的主旨---发展中国家中最好的一些企业将环保与盈利结合---令人深思。许多环保主义批评者认为这只是发达国家的奢侈品：穷人需要超洁空气之前要先解决温饱问题。甚至有些人将环保事业看作是发达国家的阴谋：西方通过工业化和污染致富，但现在却想要阻止不发达国家走同样的路线。该研究表明这些担忧被夸大了。发展中国家的企业也可以和西方的竞争者一样追求绿色。很多人早就发现，当自然资源日益短缺且消费者捉襟见肘的时候，环保事业不失为一项有利可图的商业策略。"