8.2放狗～

xxxxxxx11

覺得這次數學不簡單～考了Ｑ50運氣好


數學

1.問圓面積？
  (1)過圓心
  (2)過(3.4)
選了Ｃ

2. jj72題 條件2是兩個mile相減=多少，所以只知道每多1/4  cost y的價錢，不知道 x
   所以答案選了C

3. a.b.c.d.e中位數是多考
  (1) 平均3
  (2) 最小的數為3
所以估計五個都是3，選了Ｃ

4.62K73 可被3整除 Ｋ=? （以為自己掉到低分褲....心裡很慌）
A) 0
B) 1
C) 2
D) 3
E) 4

5.1992某商品售價是1991的120%，1993比1992下降25%  問1993是1991下降％？
題目是問下降值，注意！設1991年商品100就很好算
選了A)10%

6.A做事花的時間是B的half，兩人同時做事花10hr，問單獨給Ｂ做花多久？
  (1/x+1/2x)10=1 ，15/x=1，  x=15 故Ｂ花30小時


7. x2+bx+4 =o    問b=? Ｘ有解  帶入2分之-b加減跟號b平=4ac公式就好
  其餘選項解出來都負數

8. Q的r次方=奇數
   1) Q是奇數
   2) r是奇數
   選A

9.india 男女比例，跟jj一樣，選Ｄ

10. 什麼有個東西有500個分first level跟 second level，然後又說 有說有15%是yellow，問在first level 是yellow有幾個？
   1) second level有幾％yellow
   2.) first level 有幾％不是yellow
   忘記自己選啥了QQ

11.jj有，哪個數在xy plant上有唯一整數解，就選y=跟號3 X
   考試眼瞎想y=1/2+x想很久
12. jj32題，補充，有給yellow是正方形，邊長3，因為總邊長11-2*3=5 可知中間Ｒ梯形下底＝5        又說擊中紅色跟藍色區塊機率是1/3，故可知中間那排的高=3   所以答案案就是R面積/總面積(9*11=99) =4/33

http://imgur.com/a/w7oqq


閱讀
1.恐龍育幼的，跟jj差不多內容 題目有說哪個是H學者作為''fact''的證據（題目fact有特別家引號），跟第二段扯到的反駁證據都沒遠，就選了joint不穩無法行走


2.北美工藝，講kin relationship的  intergenerational business ，（然後有考第一段，選了家族跟事業都mutual benefitial），一派學者認討論kin relationship影響範圍，認為為都要到18XX年才會有影響，一派學者說因為modern society下降


3.女性稅收，1960-1970女生都不用繳稅，說有一段研究資料說ＸＸＸ，作者說omission了一些，說1.已婚婦女會把財產用到丈夫那邊，2.忘記..   然後Moreover，一個法律法律頒布之後，女性應該要繳稅，但是人數都
沒增加，一般認為是因為什麼illness/age...的migration 因素，但是作者認為是因為Gender，然後說是因為social recognition


4.干預治療
r

Fisher_X

构筑的前三篇阅读都是去年10.26裤的

谢谢分享！

吴作作

Fisher_X 发表于 2016-8-2 16:05
构筑的前三篇阅读都是去年10.26裤的

谢谢分享！

这样看来 有必要将去年的裤翻出来全部看一遍了

疯狂的狐狸

1.問圓面積？
  (1)過圓心
  (2)過(3.4)
選了Ｃ
这个啥过圆心呀 构筑
第二个条件是圆过3,4对吧

Crystal_Chai

感谢分享！               

xxxxxxx11

疯狂的狐狸 发表于 2016-8-2 22:25
1.問圓面積？
  (1)過圓心
  (2)過(3.4)

啊筆誤  更正！！！！是圓心是 xy軸 原點！！！
2) 是的

yangfei

楼主阅读考的是这篇？
P1 In colonial North America, as in seventeenth-and eighteenth-century Europe, families and businesses were often entwined symbiotically. 家庭和企业往往是交织在一起的共生。
Kin connections provided businesses with capital, credit, and contacts; family businesses, in turn, provided kin with employment, training, and opportunities for advancement.
P2 Colonial historians disagree, however, about the extent to which kin connections were central to artisanal establishments（1何种程度上血缘关系是手工场所的中心）and about the evolution of artisanal family practices in colonial North America in the eighteenth century（2. 在北美殖民地手工作坊家庭的做法在十八世纪的演变）Some argue that craft dynasties (intergenerational family artisanal establishments代代相传的家族作坊式场所) dominated certain crafts in certain areas until the early nineteen century. Carl Bridenbaugh wrote that an intergenerational command of craft skills enabled some artisanal families in the eighteenth century "to live in near-baronial style, and to dominate, nay rule over, the social and political life" of a region for generations. W.J. Rorabaugh has argued that intergenerational craftsmanship代代相传的 was important in all crafts until the 1840s.
P3 Other historians disagree. Stephanie Wolf, for example, argues that in craft businesses in eighteenth-century Germantown, Pennsylvania, there was "little tendency for traditional family patterns to develop. . . . Fathers do not appear to have trained their sons to follow in their footsteps.” Wolf attributes the lack of dynasties to the presence of a modern, commercial worldview. Indeed, even scholars who disagree with Wolf would concede that craft dynasties declined in importance under the influence of an increasingly widespread modern worldview.

xxxxxxx11

yangfei 发表于 2016-8-3 05:29
楼主阅读考的是这篇？
P1 In colonial North America, as in seventeenth-and eighteenth-century Europe,  ...

哇！簡直太像拉！！幾乎一模一樣拉XD