- UID
- 1132393
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2015-7-14
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
终于成功分手了 好开心。一站v32死在了愈发上面,然后怒刷500道题。努力真的是有用的,大家加油。是的我就是那个百里挑一的,数学考不到50的给同胞拖后腿的小盆友。![](static/image/smiley/default/loveliness.gif)
下面放鸡精:这不是原文 这是我的记忆碎片 请忽略不完美的语法 让我任性一次吼!
这篇好像寂静里没有。。。大家看段落大意。
阅读里面又一片文章讲的是moral relativist 和moral absolutist. The former kind of people believe that moral "right" and "wrong" is relative - there's no fixed right and wrong; the later believes that the notion of morally right and wrong is fixed and absolute.
When assess a situation is morally right or wrong, philosophers usually rely on his/her intuitions. However when ones intuition about right and wrong conflicts with that of other people, there is not a well established, commonly accepted method for philosophers to resolve the conflict. Researchers wanna know whether the reason for people to become relativists and absolutists, so they set up two experiment.
One experiment assessed the correlation between personality and relativists / absolutists and found that: the more open one is, the more likely that one will be morally relative. The other experiment reinforced this result.
The author agree with the results of the experiment (注意此处有题:最后一段高亮问author最可能相信什么,就选他认为experiment 结果合理,同意experiment验证了它们的假设),这是最后一段。
下面待补,大家加油。爱你们
Germany economics 阅读文章里有一道
|
|