ChaseDream
搜索
12下一页
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2978|回复: 17
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[原始] 逻辑阅读作文狗奉上~~5月9日的~~

[精华] [复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2010-5-10 00:15:31 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
没有看过狗,重复的不清楚哈
阅读:
1电脑科技的发展 挺长的一屏半
第一段:将什么电脑原来是啥样的。。然后随着科技的发展,电脑变小了 同时价格也变便宜了
第二段:价格便宜后。。。什么。。。最关键的是怎么样使用电脑 而不是生产电脑(有题)
第三段:讲电脑的什么untility 和****大概性价比的关系吧。。然后说之间存在代沟 哪个公司能够填补代沟 就能获得利润
第四段:讲两个公司都能填补这个代沟 Company I 所生产的software 和Comany ii 生产的。。其实company II的性能要比 Company I 的要好 但是因为C1能够使用所有机型 而C2只能使用自己生产的机型 因此在市场上竞争力小很多

题目1 主旨
      2一下哪个观点作者同意的:
      3句子作用题  gap ..性价比的gap 的作用。。

通篇其实都是什么software 和 hardware 来说computer technology的

2出口 好像是2段
第一段:政府的出口政策其实对出口企业影响很大的 有出口补贴的国家对其国家的出口企业的影响 主题就是 出口政策的不同造成了 国家与国家之间 出口企业的竞争起点就不同
第二段:没有出口补贴的企业就会采取很多措施来吸引consumers 比如说******很简单容易理解(有题 问一下哪个不是作者提出的措施)有些国际的大公司会利用各个政府的出口补贴政策的不同设立分支机构。。。
3 大概说了一个法律
原来这个法律是这样的。。产生的结果就是: 妇女没有自己的经济独立性 或者说丈夫男人可一剥夺女人的一切(囧。。)后来渐渐的很多学长产生的怀疑 然后这个法条就被修订了。。新修订的法条对这种现象进行了改观
妇女们逐渐获得自己的经济独立地位 但是仍然是有差距的 然后也就说过了多少年 这里列了两个年份大概就是 by1880年妇女是个什么状态  by 1890年妇女是个什么状态。。。就是说这个law对它的情况的改观啦。。

4拉丁语
说拉丁语对英语词汇扩充是有重要意义的
阐明了很多原因 说什么中产阶级为了显示自己***装呗。。就引起了学拉丁语的高潮。。然后同时很多的文学家为了将拉丁语翻译成英语 但是英语中没有足够多的单词能狗很好的对应拉丁语的诗词歌赋。。所以这个时候英语的单词就被扩充了。。
问主旨题

逻辑:
1说有个药能帮助人减肥 就是减肥药啦 弄了个测试 发现吃减肥药的比不吃减肥要的人还更容易肥  问解释这个原因
2 说一个公园 由于一种unnative snake 导致了一大堆的small animal 被吃了。。然后一般人就开始研究 怎么办呢这个。。然后就发现 unnative snake 呀 看到一个好的适合的地方就不动弹了 然后这帮蛇大都呆在这个Jack Park 的中央区域 所以 如果把这个地方的。。给毁了 这帮蛇就能被抓 这帮小动物的population 就不会减少了。。大概这个意思吧
3 一群毕业生毕业后找工作 很多人去大城市 但大城市有自己的缺点比如说生活成本高 。但是研究发现 没有去大城市的毕业生并没有比去大城市的毕业生 所剩下的钱(挣的减花的)多,since————填空

作文狗:
AA:去年能源**整体下滑 但是一个Bolcom。。好像是这个公司呢却盈利了。。。原因是他将efforts switch from minering to renewable energy了。。于此同时呢 这个renewable energy的其他公司在未来盈利状况普遍看好( 风能 太阳能等等)然后 于此这个BOLCOM 将来继续采用 new field strategy 未来将free from 利润的下滑

AI the most experienced candidate is the best candidate in a leadership position( 我一站的时候就是这个题。。囧死了。)
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2010-5-10 00:20:14 | 只看该作者
你运气真好遇到海豹
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2010-5-10 00:23:35 | 只看该作者
你运气真好遇到海豹
-- by 会员 草稿纸 (2010/5/10 0:20:14)


我没遇到海豹啊。。
地板
发表于 2010-5-10 00:24:34 | 只看该作者
你运气真好遇到海豹
-- by 会员 草稿纸 (2010/5/10 0:20:14)



我没遇到海豹啊。。
-- by 会员 Queeny11 (2010/5/10 0:23:35)


...................
5#
 楼主| 发表于 2010-5-10 00:46:55 | 只看该作者
自己顶顶吧。。。希望能够帮助后面考的同学
6#
发表于 2010-5-10 01:11:28 | 只看该作者
GWD-5-Q22 to GWD-5-Q25:
          Most pre-1990 literature on busi-
    nesses’ use of information technology
    (IT)—defined as any form of computer-
Line    based information system—focused on
 (5)    spectacular IT successes and reflected
    a general optimism concerning IT’s poten-
    tial as a resource for creating competitive
    advantage.  But toward the end of the
    1980’s, some economists spoke of a
(10)    “productivity paradox”:  despite huge IT
investments, most notably in the service
sectors, productivity stagnated.  In the
retail industry, for example, in which IT
had been widely adopted during the
(15)    1980’s, productivity (average output per
hour) rose at an average annual rate of
1.1 percent between 1973 and 1989, com-
pared with 2.4 percent in the preceding
25-year period.  roponents of IT argued
(20)    that it takes both time and a critical mass
    of investment for IT to yield benefits, and
    some suggested that growth figures for
    the 1990’s proved these benefits were
    finally being realized.  They also argued
(25)    that measures of productivity ignore what
    would have happened without investments
in IT—productivity gains might have been
even lower.  There were even claims that
IT had improved the performance of the
(30)    service sector significantly, although mac-
    roeconomic measures of productivity did
not reflect the improvement.
     But some observers questioned why,
    if IT had conferred economic value, it did
(35)    not produce direct competitive advantages
    for individual firms.  Resource-based
    theory offers an answer, asserting that,
    in general, firms gain competitive advan-
    tages by accumulating resources that are
(40)    economically valuable, relatively scarce,
    and not easily replicated.  According to
    a recent study of retail firms, which con-
firmed that IT has become pervasive
and relatively easy to acquire, IT by
(45)    itself appeared to have conferred little
advantage.  In fact, though little evidence
    of any direct effect was found, the fre-
quent negative correlations between IT
and performance suggested that IT had
(50)    probably weakened some firms’ compet-
itive positions.  However, firms’ human
    resources, in and of themselves, did
explain improved performance, and
some firms gained IT-related advan-
(55)    tages by merging IT with complementary
resources, particularly human resources.
    The findings support the notion, founded
in resource-based theory, that competi-
tive advantages do not arise from easily
(60)    replicated resources, no matter how
impressive or economically valuable
    they may be, but from complex, intan-
gible resources.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
GWD-5-Q22:
The passage is primarily concerned with
        
describing a resource and indicating various methods used to study it
presenting a theory and offering an opposing point of view
providing an explanation for unexpected findings
demonstrating why a particular theory is unfounded
resolving a disagreement regarding the uses of a technology

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
GWD-5-Q23:
The passage suggests that proponents of resource-based theory would be likely to explain IT’s inability to produce direct competitive advantages for individual firms by pointing out that
        
IT is not a resource that is difficult to obtain
IT is not an economically valuable resource
IT is a complex, intangible resource
economic progress has resulted from IT only in the service sector
changes brought about by IT cannot be detected by macroeconomic measures

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
GWD-5-Q24:
The author of the passage discusses productivity in the retail industry in the first paragraph primarily in order to
        
suggest a way in which IT can be used to create a competitive advantage
provide an illustration of the “productivity paradox”
emphasize the practical value of the introduction of IT
cite an industry in which productivity did not stagnate during the 1980’s
counter the argument that IT could potentially create competitive advantage

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
GWD-5-Q25:
According to the passage, most pre-1990 literature on businesses’ use of IT included which of the following?

Recommendations regarding effective ways to use IT to gain competitive advantage
Explanations of the advantages and disadvantages of adopting IT
Information about ways in which IT combined with human resources could be used to increase competitive advantage
A warning regarding the negative effect on competitive advantage that would occur if IT were not adopted
A belief in the likelihood of increased competitive advantage for firms using IT
7#
发表于 2010-5-10 01:11:39 | 只看该作者
LZ,是这个么?THX
8#
发表于 2010-5-10 01:13:56 | 只看该作者
忽然MM,五体投地。。。
9#
发表于 2010-5-10 01:26:41 | 只看该作者
LZ显身吧~
10#
发表于 2010-5-10 06:32:32 | 只看该作者
LZ显身吧~
-- by 会员 忽然忘了解脱 (2010/5/10 1:26:41)


LZ半夜一两点已经睡觉了吧 哈哈
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-5-3 03:03
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部