ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: 抓抓sandra
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[SC总结] 抓抓版【第7-13章Manhattan笔记更新中】(7.16更新第6章抓抓修订版,含OG12-50疑问和ving作结果状语OG12-71例子)(第7(1)包含o

[精华]   [复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2011-8-9 21:31:18 | 显示全部楼层
世界这么小~ls是小花呱~哈哈

抓老大!~~50题,那个that为什么要补出有筒子能解释不啊~~
是不是只是因为为避免歧义所以要补出的啊?

看了前4页,貌似没有T T
曼哈顿,我也整理了# #,不过是英文版的。。囧啊囧~
沙发
发表于 2011-8-9 21:39:23 | 显示全部楼层
世界这么小~ls是小花呱~哈哈

抓老大!~~50题,那个that为什么要补出有筒子能解释不啊~~
是不是只是因为为避免歧义所以要补出的啊?

看了前4页,貌似没有T T
曼哈顿,我也整理了# #,不过是英文版的。。囧啊囧~
-- by 会员 superbat28 (2011/8/9 21:31:18)




我也始终没有明白那个是为什么啊~~T T是有些用法是要用在避免歧义的情况下的,不过好像都不是这种呀。。
-- by 会员 抓抓sandra (2011/8/9 21:37:41)



你也不好好学习,刷CD啊。。
以下引用版主的话:一般来说that在定从中做宾语的话that需要省略,不过这里many前面的that需要补出的,为的是避免had feared和come in并列的歧义。so,无歧义凌驾于所有原则之上。

但是我还是没有大懂。。http://forum.chasedream.com/GMAT_SC/thread-487033-1-1.html  我是在这个帖子中发现这句话的,原出处不详。。
板凳
发表于 2011-8-9 22:29:52 | 显示全部楼层
我仍然存疑存疑存疑。。。先不管D选项哈。。
就说A
......, the gains in the stock market re?ect growing con?dence that the economy will avoid the recessionmany had feared earlier in the year and instead come in for a “soft landing,”这就变成了aero说的那种歧义。

这样的话,是可能had feared和instead come存在并列歧义。。

但为什么补出that就不存在了呢? the recession that many had feared earlier in the year and instead come in for a “soft landing
我觉得是一样的啊。。
地板
发表于 2011-8-10 22:39:05 | 显示全部楼层
老大~~~请看如下各种分析和想法。。如果你能有耐性读完的话T T

50. According to some analysts, the gains in the stock market reflect growing confidence that the economy will avoid the recession that many had feared earlier in the year and instead come in for a “soft landing,” followed by a gradual increase in business activity.
(A) that the economy will avoid the recession that many had feared earlier in the year and instead come
(B) in the economy to avoid the recession, what many feared earlier in the year, rather to come
(C) in the economy’s ability to avoid the recession, something earlier in the year many had feared, and instead to come
(D) in the economy to avoid the recession many were fearing earlier in the year, and rather to come
(E) that the economy will avoid the recession that was feared earlier this year by many, with it instead coming


看了一堆帖子,逐个分析一遍~抓老大审阅哈~
A: 我现在对that的补出已经没有问题了,同意老大意见。但是对于从句并列,抓抓看看我的如下分析对不对(一直是理论,还从未得到完整的实践检验)
1.定语从句或宾语从句及其他任何从句,如果并列,且从句主语不一致时,一般是that从句1(,)and that从句2
例如:The boy that I had feared, and that many people loved is her boyfriend. (定从)
OG12 Q139: The company announced that its profits declined much less in the second quarter than analysts had expected and that its business would improve in the second half of the year. (宾从)

2.但是如果并列的从句(前提是一定是两个相同的从句,比如只能是两个定语从句,不能是一个宾从一个定从),主语一致时,可以从句内部并列(说不明白,请看例子)
例如: The boy that I had feared and loved is her boyfriend.(这个和上面例一都是我编的
OG12 Q8The big bang theory holds that the universe began in an explosion and has been expending ever since.

由此推论,此题原句:According to some analysts, the gains in the stock market reflect growing confidence that the economy will avoid the recession that many had feared earlier in the year and instead come in for a “soft landing,” followed by a gradual increase in business activity.
Avoidinstead相同主语economyeconomy完成两个动作,逻辑上也正确。Confidence后面的that引导同位语从句。


B:第一个错误即是whatwhat不引导定语从句,更别提什么非限制性定语从句了。
第二个错误是in the economy to avoid这个结构。全句如果改成B选项,如下:According to some analysts, the gains in the stock market reflect growing confidence in the economy to avoid the recession, what many feared earlier in the year, rather to come in for a “soft landing,” followed by a gradual increase in business activity.

这里,魏小妞说to avoid修饰confidence,我有疑问:为什么可以跳跃指代economy?我对to do放在句尾的理解是:to do要么做定语修饰其邻近名词(如这里to do修饰economy),要么做句子状语修饰全句(这里做状语修饰reflectto avoid发出者为句子主语gains)。但因为本身这种to do结构放句尾就是歧义的,所以一般都是错的。(而这也是我为什么认为to avoid在这里是错的的理由,而不是魏小妞说的to do的动作发出者是confidence,故错。)
而且最残酷的一点是to avoid在这里还不是做the economy的定语,而是其状语,表明economyavoidcome。。to do要存在这么多的可能的话,那它一定是错的了。。。。


第三个错误,rather to come的错误。我感觉,这个结构的错,就错在rather,因为rather是个副词,且rather在不是用在”not”, “but””would”这三个词后面时不表示“宁愿”(应该就是这三个吧?不确定),当rather单独出现时表示to some degree的意思。
而对于副词来说,其后面一定是要加句子的,你也说到了,所以rather to do就错了。但是,我在想如果把rather改成and或者but了,是否就可以连接两个to do不定式了呢?(暂且假装to do不定式是economy的状语,然后两个目的to doand连接就应该没有问题了吧?)
5#
发表于 2011-8-10 22:53:00 | 显示全部楼层
CAccording to some analysts, the gains in the stock market reflect growing confidence in the economy’s ability to avoid the recession, something earlier in the year many had feared, and instead to come in for a “soft landing,” followed by a gradual increase in business activity.

第一个错误,earlier in the year的位置。介宾短语如果要谓语名词之后,会出现做定语的歧义。。(哎,每次我都知道这点,一读句子还认不出来。。。)

第二个错误,instead to come.我觉得这个错法和B很像,在这个句子里economy’s ability to avoid… and instead to come是平行结构并无问题,尽管economy’s ability to说法很恶心。但错就错在instead了,一样,instead是一个副词(这个没验证呢啊!是我觉着的。。),后面不能加to do。但同样的,我在想如果变成economy’s ability to avoid… and/but to come是不是就可以了?(但感觉如果这么改了,无论是单独的and或单独的but,感觉都不像是在表达原来的and instead的意思)


DAccording to some analysts, the gains in the stock market reflect growing confidence in the economy to avoid the recession many were fearing earlier in the year, and rather to come in for a “soft landing,” followed by a gradual increase in business activity.

这个句子我就有疑问了,为什么OG说一定要在recession后面补出that啊?就算不补出,也不会产生歧义的吧?~
但是对于其余的问题,比如were fearing的时态,以及rather to come的问题(与B一致)我并无异议。

EE第一个错误就是recession后面的定语从句用了被动不好。第二个错误,with的复合结构的使用,把原来的两个对比动作,变成了主句状态伴随,改变原意。且it指代有误。

所以,综上~我对BCD疑问仍较大。。不过是不是说的话有点多啊= =
6#
发表于 2011-8-11 21:24:42 | 显示全部楼层
对了~抓~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
给了字典下载地址吧~我下了个第5版,三个G,结果是个未破解T T
7#
发表于 2011-8-13 14:51:22 | 显示全部楼层
bat不见了哇。。- -求讨论~
-- by 会员 抓抓sandra (2011/8/13 14:23:11)




我以为你那口气没喘完呢啊~哈哈。。嗯,我现在弄。。
早上弄double跟twice来着。。囧的我分析了一道语法题,就把一早上贡献给那两个词了= =
8#
发表于 2011-8-13 15:32:53 | 显示全部楼层
bat不见了哇。。- -求讨论~
-- by 会员 抓抓sandra (2011/8/13 14:23:11)




我等你喘完气呢啊~哈哈。。嗯,我现在弄。。
早上弄double跟twice来着。。囧的我分析了一道语法题,就把一早上贡献给那两个词了= =
-- by 会员 superbat28 (2011/8/13 14:51:22)



我了个去。。我一个激动把窗口给点关闭了?!!!!!!!
9#
发表于 2011-8-13 15:45:34 | 显示全部楼层
关于第1点:
认同。一般两个独立分句都是“主谓宾主谓宾。”

关于第2点:
我同意在A选项中,补出that后会使得句子没有并列歧义。但是我仍然不能理解的是为什么D选项仍然要补出that?不补出的话,to do大平行,不会引起歧义啊~

关于第三点:
首先,澄清to do是不可以修饰整个句子的,这点是我的错,那天我没弄明白修饰句子和修饰动作有什么区别,现在我懂了。
但是,to do一定是可以做状语的~
先贴出一个斑竹的总结帖:http://forum.chasedream.com/GMAT_SC/thread-361341-1-1.html

1. to do做定语,要置于其名词后,往往该名词作为to do的宾语(这个曼哈顿有写,莫非是在老大没看的某章= =)
其例句: A book to read is mine. 这里read的宾语是book,to read修饰book

2. to do做某个动作的状语,而句中的名词,可做to do的宾语,也可作主语。
例如Q61 The terra-cotta warriors took 700,000 artisans more than 36 years to compete. (这里兵马俑做compete的宾语)

Q15 Warning that computers in the United States are not secure, the National Academy of Sciences has urged the nation to revamp computer security procedures, institute new emergency response teams, and create a special nongovernment organization to take charge of computer security planning. (这里non-government organization做take charge的主语)

to do的用法非常活,我现在也还不是特懂。但唯一确定的是:"SVO, to do"这个结构,to do不能做定语修饰主句宾语(也即紧邻名词),因为"SVO, to do"这个结构让to do长的太像状语了。(我对OG Q30 E选项的解读)
还有一点,(这是今早看到的,还不大确定)应该是也同样适用于介宾短语的:to do和介宾短语不适用于前面名词特别复杂的时候,因为要去判断逻辑主语,所以不如使用主谓结构。(如OG Q39 C选项,to be married错法有一部分是和sa as to一样的,前面太乱,不好判断逻辑主语)

关于第四、五点:
抓抓第五点的意思是:变成but instead就可以接to do咯?
那第四点你说“同意对rather to do”的看法,那是不是意味着你也同意单独变成"but to do"也可以啊~~

最后的最后,再次对D选项为什么一定要有that提出疑问~
10#
发表于 2011-8-20 11:07:05 | 显示全部楼层
恩~应该是咯。。破to do
抓抓加油~~~~~吼哈哈
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-5-20 03:46
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部