ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 7377|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

OG 16 解释中的even if

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2016-4-30 10:54:12 | 显示全部楼层 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
楼主看OG解释真的感觉很痛苦,但有些解释很好,不得不说那个even if把我绕晕了,很多选项都用有关无关排除,但是OG很多都用even if,问题来了,用了even if我觉得并不能说明什么啊,还请大神点播。例如:OG 41 题的D选项。
Although there is no record of poet Edmund Spenser’s parentage, we do know that
as a youth Spenser attended the Merchant Tailors’ School in London for a period
between 1560 and 1570. Records from this time indicate that the Merchant Tailors’
Guild then had only three members named Spenser: Robert Spenser, listed as a
gentleman; Nicholas Spenser, elected the Guild’s Warden in 1568; and John
Spenser, listed as a “journeyman cloth-maker.” Of these, the last was likely the
least affluent of the three—and most likely Edmund’s father, since school
accounting records list Edmund as a scholar who attended the school at a reduced
fee.
Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?
(A) Anybody in sixteenth-century London who made clothing professionally
would have had to be a member of the Merchant Tailors’ Guild.
(B) The fact that Edmund Spenser attended the Merchant Tailors’ School
did not necessarily mean that he planned to become a tailor.
(C) No member of the Guild could become Guild warden in sixteenthcentury
London unless he was a gentleman.
(D) Most of those whose fathers were members of the Merchant Tailors’
Guild were students at the Merchant Tailors’ School.
(E) The Merchant Tailors’ School did not reduce its fees for the children of
the more affluent Guild members.


解释是Even if most children of fathers in the guild did not attend the school, all the children who did attend the school might have had fathers in the guild.
这个选项我排出的理由就是即使D选项成立也不能说明文中的父子关系,根本没有向OG的解释想这么多,这个OG 的解释到底再讲些什么,楼主想了30分钟都没有搞清楚里面的逻辑。

求人解答啊!

收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2016-4-30 14:11:10 | 显示全部楼层
楼主下午做题的时候突然有些感觉。
even if 一般用于assumption问题,就是所谓的negation题里用。
取非削弱为正确答案,而取非后原来的结论仍然成立或者没有影响的则为错。
再求大神指点!!!
就像这道题,即使那些父亲in the guiild 的大多数孩子没有去上学(取非),仍然不能说明他们不是父子。没有削弱,所以错误。
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2016-4-30 14:14:05 | 显示全部楼层
但是仍然感觉有很多题不用这么麻烦,可能assumption题由于可以引入新信息,所以不能用有关无关开解决???
地板
 楼主| 发表于 2016-4-30 15:34:18 | 显示全部楼层
alzn2765 发表于 2016-4-30 15:04
看OG的解释你估计永远不知道CR题应该怎么做。OG的首要原则就是-一定不能告诉考生有用的信息。

这题是明显 ...

是啊,我在这个之前看过bible,并做了prep08,觉得差不多有一套自己的方法,这几天刷OG觉得自己的思路全部被打乱了,错误率也变高,是不是还是按着自己的方法走。但是很多人都说看OG能够知道出题的思路。。。。。。该怎么提高啊
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-5-5 22:59
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部