[揽瓜阁逻辑小分队] day87

Ysandre · 发表于 2022-12-14 22:18:19

想带着大家每天坚持读逻辑，就拿来Source为鸡精的逻辑真题，每天带着大家打卡，希望大家能坚持每天学习+逻辑打卡；

大家可以在有限时间内阅读并分析逻辑链，本帖回复结构和猜测的答案方向，可以看看谁猜的准！大家都是大侦探！

每日的答案和结构在揽瓜阁逻辑群中更新

揽瓜阁逻辑群加群方式在本文末尾

考试群：

GMAT入群／揽瓜阁入群方式：https://forum.chasedream.com/thread-1382779-1-1.html

揽瓜阁阅读精读（读什么文章，大家读过就懂了）：

https://forum.chasedream.com/forum-25-1.html

公众号：1.考什么试

2.商校百科

申请群

1. ChaseDream 2023 MBA 申请／校友答疑／面试群：

https://forum.chasedream.com/thread-863011-1-1.html

2.英国，新加坡，美国，法国，加拿大，香港，德国商科申请群：

https://forum.chasedream.com/thread-1387919-1-1.html

3. 行业分享交流／职业规划群：

https://forum.chasedream.com/thread-1388171-1-1.html

小红书：

1.留学+考试最新消息关注妥妥妥了（小红书号：323014154）

2.求职+MBA 最新消息关注元（小红书号：895404330）

朋友们！揽瓜阁逻辑小分队重新上线啦～每日材料我们仍旧会发布在ChaseDream GMAT 逻辑版块。

为了响应大家想拉群专门讨论2022揽瓜阁逻辑的要求，我们设立了小范围的打卡群（仅针对确定会打卡的同学），现作出揽瓜阁逻辑2022打卡群入群流程如下：

1.完成小分队任意三日的逻辑打卡任务（需回帖并截图），指路：https://forum.chasedream.com/thread-1388800-1-1.html

2.向小蓝鸡发送关键字：【揽瓜阁逻辑2022】并附上三次任务截图后耐心等待入群即可。

3. 本次小分队活动为纯公益性活动，为了督促大家学习，采取严格的打卡审查制度，连续三日不打卡的朋友会被无情清退。

⚠️重要提醒：如您还不是GMAT交流群群友，请先申请进入GMAT交流群后再申请进入揽瓜阁逻辑2022打卡群

最新鸡麦群入口：

https://forum.chasedream.com/thread-1382779-1-1.html

手机微信打开或者电脑网页打开均可，记得一定要登录再填，无需跳转APP

Day 87
1. 增长的酒店税收
Tourists have long complained that hotel accommodations in Midville are too expensive. Starting last year, the city council, hoping to attract more tourists, lowered the hotel tax rate to 5 percent of room charges. By the end of last year, Midville had taken in no less money from hotel taxes than it did the year before, so an examination of the hotel records will show that more tourists stayed in city hotels last year than the year before.
Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?
A. The tourists who stayed in Midville hotels last year were aware that the hotel tax rate had been lowered.
B. The average price of hotel accommodations in Midville was not significantly higher than in hotels in other cities either last year or the year before.
C. The average length of a tourist’s stay in Midville hotels was not longer last year than it had been the year before.
D. There were significantly more efforts to publicize Midville as a tourist destination last year than there had been the year before.
E. On average, tourists in Midville did not spend significantly more on meals last year than they did on hotels accommodations.

2. 洞穴鱼和猫头鹰
政府投资10000刀（可能不准）保护一种要灭绝的鱼（cave fish），但是投资2000000刀给一种猫头鹰，然而这个猫头鹰的数量并不少，远远不至于灭绝，然后呢就有人批评政府说：你这个保护cave鱼的措施effort投入太少啦~~
题目是削弱

3. 官员和媒体的恶战
Corruption, 有两个国家，L和K，L的public awareness of corruption is better than nation K,但国家L的corruption却更多，最后得出结论是应该归咎与L的媒体，问支持,

Serenatt · 发表于 2022-12-15 03:43:53

看一下！

Serenatt · 发表于 2022-12-15 04:03:46

Day 87
1.       增长的酒店税收
Tourists have long complained that hotel accommodations in Midville are too expensive.  Starting last year, the city council, hoping to attract more tourists, lowered the hotel tax rate to 5 percent of room charges.  By the end of last year, Midville had taken in no less money from hotel taxes than it did the year before, so an examination of the hotel records will show that more tourists stayed in city hotels last year than the year before.
Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?
A. The tourists who stayed in Midville hotels last year were aware that the hotel tax rate had been lowered.（游客感没感觉到无关
B. The average price of hotel accommodations in Midville was not significantly higher than in hotels in other cities either last year or the year before.（跟other cities无关
C. The average length of a tourist’s stay in Midville hotels was not longer last year than it had been the year before.（取非，去年游客在M待的时间比前些年的要长，但是如果待时间长的话，那就不能得到去年在M的游客要多很多甚至破纪录了，所以取非削弱
D. There were significantly more efforts to publicize Midville as a tourist destination last year than there had been the year before.（陈述文章
E. On average, tourists in Midville did not spend significantly more on meals last year than they did on hotels accommodations.（游客吃饭与住宿之间的比较无关

答案：C

2.       洞穴鱼和猫头鹰
政府投资10000刀（可能不准）保护一种要灭绝的鱼（cave fish），但是投资2000000刀给一种猫头鹰，然而这个猫头鹰的数量并不少，远远不至于灭绝，然后呢就有人批评政府说：你这个保护cave鱼的措施effort投入太少啦~~
题目是削弱

P：投资很多钱给猫头鹰，但是猫头鹰的数量不少
P：本来就是想保护一种要灭绝的鱼
C：有人说保护鱼的措施太少了
Q：削弱结论，支持政府的决定
方向：可以说鱼和猫头鹰的关系，给猫头鹰投资那么多钱就是为了避免间接因素去吃鱼

3.       官员和媒体的恶战
Corruption, 有两个国家，L和K，L的public awareness of corruption is better than nation K,但国家L的corruption却更多，最后得出结论是应该归咎与L的媒体，问支持,

P：L的公众比K的公众更经常意识到国家贪污腐败，但是L的腐败情况更严重
C：是因为L的媒体搞事情
Q：支持
方向：可以具体举例说明媒体做的事情对隐瞒贪污腐败有好处，或者说媒体和L公众之间的不透明，尽管公众意识到了，但被媒体截胡所以没啥用

【记者为了能够挖出真相，所以对政府实际的情况 biased 了】

断了的弦 · 发表于 2022-12-15 09:36:41

快看看

断了的弦 · 发表于 2022-12-15 09:56:15

1.c
2.保护猫头鹰可以减少猫头鹰对鱼的捕食，间接保护鱼
3.可以说l国的媒体更喜欢报道政府的事

Ak777 · 发表于 2022-12-15 11:50:45

同意！

Ak777 · 发表于 2022-12-15 12:07:27

Day 87
1.       增长的酒店税收
Tourists have long complained that hotel accommodations in Midville are too expensive.  Starting last year, the city council, hoping to attract more tourists, lowered the hotel tax rate to 5 percent of room charges.  By the end of last year, Midville had taken in no less money from hotel taxes than it did the year before, so an examination of the hotel records will show that more tourists stayed in city hotels last year than the year before.
Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?
A. The tourists who stayed in Midville hotels last year were aware that the hotel tax rate had been lowered.
B. The average price of hotel accommodations in Midville was not significantly higher than in hotels in other cities either last year or the year before.
C. The average length of a tourist’s stay in Midville hotels was not longer last year than it had been the year before.
D. There were significantly more efforts to publicize Midville as a tourist destination last year than there had been the year before.
E. On average, tourists in Midville did not spend significantly more on meals last year than they did on hotels accommodations.
-C

2.       洞穴鱼和猫头鹰
政府投资10000刀（可能不准）保护一种要灭绝的鱼（cave fish），但是投资2000000刀给一种猫头鹰，然而这个猫头鹰的数量并不少，远远不至于灭绝，然后呢就有人批评政府说：你这个保护cave鱼的措施effort投入太少啦~~
题目是削弱
-金钱并不能衡量effort
-包含猫头鹰让cave fish也收益

3.       官员和媒体的恶战
Corruption, 有两个国家，L和K，L的public awareness of corruption is better than nation K,但国家L的corruption却更多，最后得出结论是应该归咎与L的媒体，问支持,
-一国公众的public awareness of corruption越强，看到媒体揭露贪污，会导致贪污事件发生次数下降。侧面发映出L已经better却还是贪污多，那需要归咎媒体揭露不力

Shell_liang · 发表于 2022-12-15 13:29:06

看一下！

sesan · 发表于 2022-12-15 14:05:51

同意！

sesan · 发表于 2022-12-15 14:25:27

Day 87
1. 增长的酒店税收
Tourists have long complained that hotel accommodations in Midville are too expensive. Starting last year, the city council, hoping to attract more tourists, lowered the hotel tax rate to 5 percent of room charges. By the end of last year, Midville had taken in no less money from hotel taxes than it did the year before, so an examination of the hotel records will show that more tourists stayed in city hotels last year than the year before.
Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?
A. The tourists who stayed in Midville hotels last year were aware that the hotel tax rate had been lowered.
B. The average price of hotel accommodations in Midville was not significantly higher than in hotels in other cities either last year or the year before.
C. The average length of a tourist’s stay in Midville hotels was not longer last year than it had been the year before.
D. There were significantly more efforts to publicize Midville as a tourist destination last year than there had been the year before.
E. On average, tourists in Midville did not spend significantly more on meals last year than they did on hotels accommodations.

C: 去年更多的游客来到酒店比前年
P：M地收税的价格少—酒店房间便宜
选C：去年的游客并没有呆得比前年呆得更久—若呆久了，则对结论产生影响

2. 洞穴鱼和猫头鹰
政府投资10000刀（可能不准）保护一种要灭绝的鱼（cave fish），但是投资2000000刀给一种猫头鹰，然而这个猫头鹰的数量并不少，远远不至于灭绝，然后呢就有人批评政府说：你这个保护cave鱼的措施effort投入太少啦~~
题目是削弱
C：政府对cave effort 投入太少
P：政府投入猫头鹰的钱远超于cave鱼
方向：cave 鱼的数量很少，平均投入额高；鱼的数量少，治理总数不用那么多钱。

3. 官员和媒体的恶战
Corruption, 有两个国家，L和K，L的public awareness of corruption is better than nation K,但国家L的corruption却更多，最后得出结论是应该归咎与L的媒体，问支持,

L国家的公众意识corruption 较好，但是L国家corruption 较多----原因可能是L媒体

支持：L媒体发布这样的信息能吸引更多群众的注意，profit上升；

[揽瓜阁逻辑小分队] day87

所属分类: GMAT考试

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

浏览过的版块