ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: luciole
打印 上一主题 下一主题

OG-12-102题,这答案真是太牵强了!求人指点!

[复制链接]
21#
发表于 2011-5-24 09:24:06 | 只看该作者
看完论坛内那个og翻译贴~再对着看就懂了。。。都是因为么有读懂题目所以做不对~
22#
发表于 2011-7-21 11:54:26 | 只看该作者
啦啦啦
23#
发表于 2011-7-21 11:59:11 | 只看该作者
我是这么做题的:

本文逻辑推理是


A:  the director claims that this production is as similar to the original production as is possible in a modern theather
B: the actor giives a performance very reminiscent of the 20th American comedian GM
C: GM's coic style was very much within the comic acting tradition



A推出B再推出C

那使A能够顺利推出B的considerations 是答案D

THE performance of the actor who plays Harlequin in La Finestrina does not serve as evidence against the director's claim


有了这个CONSIDERATION

就可以推出A-B-C
24#
发表于 2011-7-27 11:26:21 | 只看该作者
题目的意思是说题目中的consideration可以作为以下哪个argument的一部分。既然题目中的都是相关性了,所以就不能用作批驳导演的理由了。
做逻辑做得很不顺,难道OG是越到后面越难,觉得好多非要看答案才明白。。。这个我是看了还不明白!!
102. Theater critic: The play La Finestrina, now at the Central Theater, was written in Italy in the 18th century.The director claims that this production is as similar to the original production as is possible in a modern theater.Although the actor who plays Harlequin the clown gives a performance very reminiscent of the 20th century American comedian Groucho Marx, Marx's comic style was very much within the comic acting tradition that had begun in 16th century Italy.
The considerations given best serve as part of an argument that


D. the performance of the actor who plays Harle quin in La Finestrna does not serve as evidence against the director's claim

答案就是这个D选项了,我不明白既然这个演员的表演是和另一个具有从意大利16世纪开始出现的表演传统的演员有相同的风格,那就是说这个演员也是意大利16世纪的那种风格啊,而导演说的是这出戏已经是现在戏剧里最接近原作的,而原作是产生于18世纪,难道说从16世纪开始的表演传统是和18世纪一样的吗?所以不能用作反对导演的话,我觉得这么明显的时间不一样,明显是说导演说的那句话应该被反驳吧,真是不懂!
-- by 会员 luciole (2010/4/14 22:18:08)


-- by 会员 iceberg07 (2010/4/14 23:03:19)

错了啊,注意是considerations given,用了复数,说明是问以下这些considerations种哪个可以作为原文argument(即
that this production is as similar to the original production as is possible in a modern theater.)的一部分。
25#
发表于 2012-7-26 20:45:44 | 只看该作者
我觉得楼上对问题的翻译是错的。。。
26#
发表于 2012-7-28 19:00:12 | 只看该作者
同意Sure1301的观点。

导演:虽然这个戏是在现代的戏院演的,但是尽量忠于原著了
演员风格承袭了某个20世纪的演员风格,而这个20世纪的演员本身是个复古派。
所以整个来讲,整个戏是复古的,符合导演说法。
27#
发表于 2012-12-14 09:43:41 | 只看该作者
题目的意思是说题目中的consideration可以作为以下哪个argument的一部分。既然题目中的都是相关性了,所以就不能用作批驳导演的理由了。
做逻辑做得很不顺,难道OG是越到后面越难,觉得好多非要看答案才明白。。。这个我是看了还不明白!!
102. Theater critic: The play La Finestrina, now at the Central Theater, was written in Italy in the 18th century.The director claims that this production is as similar to the original production as is possible in a modern theater.Although the actor who plays Harlequin the clown gives a performance very reminiscent of the 20th century American comedian Groucho Marx, Marx's comic style was very much within the comic acting tradition that had begun in 16th century Italy.
The considerations given best serve as part of an argument that


D. the performance of the actor who plays Harle quin in La Finestrna does not serve as evidence against the director's claim

答案就是这个D选项了,我不明白既然这个演员的表演是和另一个具有从意大利16世纪开始出现的表演传统的演员有相同的风格,那就是说这个演员也是意大利16世纪的那种风格啊,而导演说的是这出戏已经是现在戏剧里最接近原作的,而原作是产生于18世纪,难道说从16世纪开始的表演传统是和18世纪一样的吗?所以不能用作反对导演的话,我觉得这么明显的时间不一样,明显是说导演说的那句话应该被反驳吧,真是不懂!
-- by 会员 luciole (2010/4/14 22:18:08)



-- by 会员 iceberg07 (2010/4/14 23:03:19)


错了啊,注意是considerations given,用了复数,说明是问以下这些considerations种哪个可以作为原文argument(即
that this production is as similar to the original production as is possible in a modern theater.)的一部分。


-- by 会员 cynthia628 (2011/7/27 11:26:21)



我同意你的说法,这个题目的问题问的并不是结论,结论是文中提到的“The director claims......”,  这个题目问的是以下哪个是支持文中结论的?Support!
可以从OG的解释中看出来,"there is nothing here that supports that" (OG解释中的最后一句),所以说这里我们需要找一个SUPPORT
28#
发表于 2013-10-30 07:53:00 | 只看该作者
cynthia628 发表于 2011-7-27 11:26
题目的意思是说题目中的consideration可以作为以下哪个argument的一部分。既然题目中的都是相关性了,所 ...

不要误人子弟了。好好想一下问题中的that是指代什么的。
29#
发表于 2016-3-19 12:11:43 | 只看该作者
Step one of the Kaplan method tells us to read the question stem, and then to determine the kind of question that it is. The question stem:

“The considerations given best serve as part of an argument that”

Okay, so there are considerations given (by the author) leading up to an argument. The “considerations given” is evidence, and the question wants us to determine the author’s main point, or conclusion. We call this type of question a “main point” question.

Step two is to analyze the stimulus: Normally, we identify a conclusion by looking for words like “thus, therefore, hence, etc.” .... BUT, in a main point question, we actually don’t want to be attracted by those kind of words-they are put there by the test-maker because they know you will naturally be attracted to them in a main point question.

Instead, in a main point question, the author’s main point will often be signalled by a contrast keyword such as “but,” “however,” “while,” or, “although.”

In the passage of this question, we learn of the director’s claim in the second sentence. The director’s claim is that their reproduction of the play is a lot like the original play. The next sentence starts with the word “although.” Here, the function of “although” is to dismiss potential counter-evidence against the director’s claim: the fact that the actor is like 20th century Groucho Marx could be used against the director’s claim (that the reproduction is a faithful representation of the original 16th century version.)

So from the word “although,” and using some critical reasoning, we can determine that the author’s intent in arguing is to defend the director’s claim against evidence that could go against it (against the director’s claim).

Step three of the method is to make a prediction of the right answer. Say to yourself: “The author is defending the director. The author’s main point is that the director’s claim is correct.”

Step four is to aggressively scan for a match to the prediction. Because we spent so much time generating the prediction, and because we don’t care about wrong answers and why they are wrong, we scan for a choice that matches our insight.
30#
发表于 2016-4-23 01:46:39 | 只看该作者
sandrababy 发表于 2016-3-19 12:11
Step one of the Kaplan method tells us to read the question stem, and then to determine the kind of  ...

Step four...
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-6-4 18:11
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部