Do you agree or disagree,people who go out from theirvillege will be more successful and happier than people who stay in theirvillage?
It is a common phenomenon that people with ambition, especially college graduates and young people, will stay out from their village and stuggle for a better future in the city. Most of us admire them a lot ,and regard them to be surely successiful and of ability. But the fact is that success or happiness are not from the varied ground that they stand on . To those who managed to win their career and love, they are definitely minor successes in the fierce competitions.They deserve our respect and appreciation. However, there are also large quantity of people from the village doing some low-paying manual works inthe city, most are what we called the immigrant workers. They seek fortune in the city because of insufficient money to support a elementary life . Maybe they are not so willing to stay out, so it’s apperent that they are barely more successful and happier than even ordinarypeople. To those who stay in the village, there is no abosolute definition that they are unsuccessful . Some well-educated graduates return bringing back advanced technologies and creative ideas to develop their hometown . Isn’t that a kind of success? Anyway, they will be surely happier than some outside the village. Moreover, Some people do not go out in order to take good care of their parents or children ,or maybe avoid Empty Nester ,a currently universal phenomenon .When it comes to this, it's hard to indicate that they are not happier or more successful .Also, currently a large number of young graduates are eager to teach in remote villages,devoting themselves to advancethe children’s education and light up their future. Therefore,from my point of view, success and happiness depends on their ambition and efforts .It should not be judeged merely by their location.Thus I strongly disagree the definition those strugglers outside the village are more successful and happier than people in village.
8.31综合 TPO5 In the lecture, the professor refutes theevidences proposed in the reading material from several aspects. First and foremost, the primaryusage of the Chaco structure ,accoding to the text, is to acommadate hundredsof people .However, few signs showed that people had ever lived inside thebuilding.On the contrary, the fireplaces ,a place for cooking, showed aevidence against the proposal.That is, it's a satire that the number offireplaces discovered inside the structure is fairly fewer than it suppose tobe . Only 10 fireplaces found in one of the largest houses, which iscontradictory with the 100 families lived in the room. Secondly,to store grain maize, containers are a must .Nevertheless, Excavations revealedthat among the uncovered matters, there is no such maize containers .It will benot so reliable to judge the Chaco structure as a place to store food without acontainer or a further evidence. Finnally,when ti comes to the broken pots in Pueblo Alto, it is doubted that those potsare used for ceremonies .Hypothesis is that these pots are merely buildingmaterails left in the house ,or else there are only for ordinary drinking andeating without a ceremony.That is, they indeed used those pots,but you cannotdecide whether there is a ceremony there.
In the lecture, the professor refutes the evidences proposed in the reading material from several aspects. First and foremost, the primary usage of the Chaco structure (structures) , accoding (according) to the text, is to acommadate (accommodate) hundreds of people. (原文给观点时只说了作用是居住，而不是容纳上百的人，即原文观点没有给数目，这样说虽然也没什么大错，但还是小心为好吧)However, few signs showed that people had ever lived inside the building. On the contrary, the fireplaces, a place （places）for cooking, showed a （an）evidence against the proposal. That is, it's a satire（不要加入个人观点）that the number of fireplaces discovered inside the structure is fairly fewer than it suppose （supposed）to be . Only 10 fireplaces found in one of the largest houses, which is contradictory with the 100 families lived in the room. （原文中的数字都加了around，而且是more than 100） Secondly, to store grain maize, containers are a must. Nevertheless, Excavations revealed that among the uncovered matters, there is （was）no such maize containers （此处另一细节是traces of maize）. It will be not so reliable to judge the Chaco structure （structures）as a place to store food without a container or a further evidence （个人观点，删去）. Finnally （Finally）, when ti （it）comes to the broken pots in Pueblo Alto, it is doubted that those pots are （were）used for ceremonies .Hypothesis is （was）that these pots are （were）merely building materails（materials）left in the house, （pots 不是建筑材料，原文是说在放pots的地方还有其他与ceremony无关的东西，比如一些建筑材料）or else there are only for ordinary drinking and eating without a ceremony （说 the pots were left by the workers after meals 就好了）. That is, they indeed used those pots, but you cannot decide whether there is a ceremony there. （总结句可以不要）
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号
发表于 2012-8-31 19:53:25
收藏
收藏
楼主
不好意思 实在是菜。。
