TPO19综合写作 求拍！@

584257720

课太多，暂时来不及写独立，先把综合贴上来，求指教！

The reading suggests several problems associated with the advertising tactic called 'buzzing' and hopes to ban this marketing strategy. However, the lecturer, serves as a real buzzer, challenges the author of the reading.
The first thing the lecturer refutes is the point in the reading that buzzing misleads customers by providing bogus information of the products. In his counterargument, buzzing works in a way which is not described as that mentioned in the reading. Actually, companies will only hire people who really feel it good after using the products. In this way, the lecturer contradicts with the author by emphasizing that buzzers do not tell lies since they have all tried out the products and think highly of them.
Second, the lecturer casts doubt on the point of the reading that buzzing harms customers by making them less critical to what they hear and see in the advertising. From his perspective, the opposite case is true where customers are more likely to ask buzzers a series of question associated with the products they want to buy and only after they get satisfactory answers will they buy the buzzed products. And that is to say, instead of being less critical mentioned in the reading, customers are more meticulous before buzzers.
Finally, the lecturer raises question towards the point that buzzing negatively influence the civilization.He goes on to reveal a fact that if the product of a company is not so good, then no buzzers are willing to recommend such a product to their customers. In this respect, customers get truth from the buzzers and will be satisfied with their buyings. Therefore, customers are more trustful and open to people.
In a nutshell, the lecturer challenges the evidence and argument of the author one by one and restates that the comment about buzzing in the reading is biased and misleading.

易雨水巷

TPO19
红色为错误 高亮为精彩 蓝色为疑问或者建议 绿色为总结
The reading suggests several problemsassociated with the advertising tactic called 'buzzing' and hopes to ban thismarketing strategy. However, the lecturer, serves (serving)as a real buzzer, challenges the author of the reading.
The first thing the lecturer refutes is the point in the reading that buzzingmisleads customers by providing bogus information of the products. In his counterargument, buzzingworks in a way which is not described as that mentioned in the reading.Actually, companies will only hire people who really feel it good after usingthe products. In this way, the lecturer contradictswith (去掉with contradict及物)the author by emphasizing thatbuzzers do not tell lies since they have all tried out the products and thinkhighly of them.
Second, the lecturer casts doubt on the point of the reading that buzzing harmscustomers by making them less critical to what they hear and see in theadvertising. From his perspective, the opposite case is true where customersare more likely to ask buzzers a series of question associated with theproducts they want to buy and only after they get satisfactory answers will they buy the buzzedproducts. And （可以去掉）that is to say, instead of being less critical mentioned in thereading, customers are more meticulousbefore buzzers.
Finally, the lecturer raisesquestion towards the point that buzzing negatively influence thecivilization. He goes on to reveal a fact that if the product of a company isnot so good, then no buzzers are willing to recommend such a product to theircustomers. In this respect,customers get truth from the buzzers and will be satisfied with their buyings（查了一下，貌似用在口语中当“购买的东西”但貌似不可数）. Therefore, customers are more trustful and open to people.
In a nutshell, thelecturer challenges the evidence and argument of the author one by one andrestates that the comment about buzzing in the reading is biased andmisleading.

To 584257720
很赞的文，不论是从字数、结构、句子、还是听力细节上，可以说很perfect O(∩_∩)O