瓜瓜卷土重来啦！！！！

瓜瓜不瓜

6月24日110108 ML Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Food in the past was much healthier than today.

As food is the basic of lives, people have been paying a great attention to food since thousands of years ago. There is no doubt that with society moving forward, food is becoming more and more various. However, the question is put forward—whether food in the past was much healthier than today. Even though food today tastes better than in the past, I, personally, hold the opinion tightly that food in the past was much healthier.

First of all, it is self-evident that a lot field whose soil has been polluted nowadays. As almost all original food come from field, it is certain that these original food contain some pollution, which is harmful to human being’s health. Take used batteries for example. Lots of toxin elements from abandoned batteries poison not only soil but also water, thus vegetables, as well as fish contain those toxin. What is worse, those toxins accumulate along with biologic chains, and human beings, who are at the top of the chain, eat all these toxin elements.

Second, food additives in food production also make food unsafe for people today. Nowadays, some food factories, in order to cut cost down, use more and more chemical substances to produce food addictives, which are not supposed to be added into food. Take the scandal of Chinese milk in 2010 for example. In order to reach the standard of protein concentration, some factories put melamine in to milk. However, melamine is a kind of industrial material, and do harm to human beings’ brains. As things like this scandal happens all over the world, how can we say without hesitation that food today are healthier?

Last but not least, technology progresses, especially transgenic plants, make people exposed to uncertain risk. Lots of peanuts and beans are the production of genetically modified plants. It remains as a mystery what is side-effect of GM. Although people prefer nature food to GM food, a lot GM food still exists in our daily life.

Admittedly, there are more various food today than in the past and technology does bring us convenience. But, endless pollution, numerous food additives and uncertain GM food make food today not as healthy as in the past.


停了一个多月以后，文章真心写不出来，这一篇憋死我了T.T///

kchszy061ban

As food is the basic（basic for?） of lives, people have been paying a great attention to food since thousands of years ago. There is no doubt that with society moving forward, food is becoming more and more various. However, the question is put forward—whether food in the past was much healthier than today. Even though food today tastes better than in the past, I, personally, hold the opinion tightly that food in the past was much healthier.

First of all, it is self-evident that a lot field whose soil has been polluted nowadays. As almost all original food come from field, it is certain that these original food contain some pollution, which is harmful to human being’s health. Take used batteries for example. Lots of toxin elements from abandoned batteries poison not only soil but also water, thus vegetables, as well as fish contain those toxin. What is worse, those toxins accumulate along with biologic chains, and human beings, who are at the top of the chain, eat all these toxin elements.

Second, food additives in food production also make food unsafe for people today. Nowadays, some food factories, in order to cut cost down, use more and more chemical substances to produce food addictives, which are not supposed(这个改为allowed是不是更好) to be added into food. Take the scandal of Chinese milk in 2010 for example. In order to reach the standard of protein concentration, some factories（intendly） put (large amount of )melamine in to milk. However(while,but,换一下词), melamine is a kind of industrial material, and do harm to human beings’ brains. As things like this scandal happens（这个似乎也是不能随便推广到全球的额。） all over the world, how can we say without hesitation that food today are healthier?

Last but not least, technology progresses, especially transgenic plants, make people exposed to uncertain risk. Lots of peanuts and beans are the production of genetically modified plants. It remains as a mystery what is side-effect of GM. Although people prefer nature food to GM food, a lot GM food still exists in our daily life.

Admittedly, there are more various food today than in the past and technology does bring us convenience. But, endless pollution, numerous food additives and uncertain GM food make food today not as healthy as in the past.



瓜瓜你的语言很顺畅，逻辑也很严密。嘿嘿，不错不错。

kchszy061ban

瓜瓜我爱死你啦，哈哈，你改的很认真的说。看你的作文写的比我好太多，以后多看下你作文。

tyyhappy

瓜瓜，我来催债来了，25号的作文呢·····刷新好几遍的人好哀怨·····

瓜瓜不瓜

我错了T.T  HAPPY 今天白天出去耍了。。马上改你的！

瓜瓜不瓜

6月25日101022 NA Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The advice from grandparents has no use for their grandchildren because the world changed a lot during the past 50 years.


Have you come up with such a situation—your grandparents offer advice which seems to be unavailable for you? While the old likes to guide the young to follow their wish, the young regard these kind of suggestions out-of-date, because they think that the world has been changing all the time. Personally, I do not think it is right to turn down Grandparents’ advice just for the above reason.

To begin with, Grandparents have gone through lots of troubles and difficult time, thus they have a much richer life experiences than Grandchildren. An old Chinese saying goes like this：The amount of salt eaten by the old is larger than the amount of rice eaten by the young. Though there is a little exaggeration in this saying, it point out a truth that as Grandparents have experienced so much, they know what is a proper way to take.

Second, admitted that the world does change a lot though 50 years, we cannot conclude that Grandparents has not move with times. In no ways can a person be cut off from the outside world. Therefore, the old go with the times and update their knowledge constantly. There is a well-known old man in Britain, who went to Cambridge University at his 70’s, and read newspaper every day. Such kind of “fashion” old man is quite common in modern society. What’s more, Internet and TV make information spread even wider and more quickly. So, it is unwise to assert that advice from Grandparents is out-of-date.

Admittedly, some suggestion may be not that useful in modern society, but it is not the reason for Grandchildren to turn a deaf ear to Grandparents’ advice. It is definitely not harmful for one to listen different opinion from different people, because analyzing problem from various aspects help people understand it better, and make a right choice.

To sum up, as Grandparents have richer life experiences, move forward with times, the young should not refuse their advice just because they think that the advice is out-of-date and becomes useless. Anyway, why not listen a different voice which is helpful for one to make a right choice?

tyyhappy

Have you come up with such a situation—your grandparents offer advice which seems to be unavailable for you? While the old likes(like) to guide the young to follow their wish, the young regard these kind(kinds) of suggestions out-of-date, because they think that the world has been changing all the time. Personally, I do not think it is right to turn down Grandparents’ advice just for the above reason.

To begin with, Grandparents have gone through lots of troubles and difficult time, thus they have a much richer life experiences(experience) than Grandchildren(grandchildren为什么大写了呢). An old Chinese saying goes like this：The amount of salt eaten by the old is larger than the amount of rice eaten by the young. Though there is a little exaggeration in this saying, it point(points) out a truth that as Grandparents have experienced so much, they know what is a proper way to take.
(这一段的论证略感单薄，给了一个谚语和一句解释，感觉有些不足哪。)
Second, admitted that the world does change a lot though (through) 50 years, we cannot conclude that Grandparents has not move (moved) with times. In no ways can a person be cut off from the outside world. Therefore, the old go with the times and update their knowledge constantly. There is a well-known old man in Britain, who went to Cambridge University at his 70’s, and read newspaper every day. Such kind of “fashion” old man is quite common in modern society. What’s more, Internet and TV make information spread even (more widely) wider and more quickly. So, it is unwise to assert that advice from Grandparents is out-of-date.
（这一段论证的思路是因为老人们很多也很紧跟社会脚步，所以他们的建议也紧跟社会脚步。我觉得可以再在后面论证的时加一部分就是给个例子他们的建议怎样紧跟社会进步了。这样比较到位。）
Admittedly, some suggestion(s) may be not that useful in modern society, but it is not the reason for Grandchildren to turn a deaf ear to Grandparents’ advice. It is definitely not harmful for one to listen (to) different opinion(s) from different people, because analyzing problem from various aspects help people understand it better, and （觉得这里加个语气助词更好。）make a right choice.

To sum up, as Grandparents have richer life experiences, move forward with times, the young should not refuse their advice just because they think that the advice is out-of-date and becomes useless. Anyway, why not listen (to) a different voice which is helpful for one to make a right choice?



总的来说瓜瓜的作文结构清楚，用词有闪光点。

但是觉得论证部分还有待加强，小错误比较多。

瓜瓜不瓜

6月26日100206 NA Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? High school students should take a course on basic economics.


Have you ever be thinking about what the meaning of high school education? Have you ever been in a dilemma whether to take a course on basic economics? Nowadays, as the world is full of economic news, no one can deny that economic has been one of the hottest topics all around the world. Thus, to the question whether college students should choose a course on basic economics, my answer is definitely yes.

First of all, high school education means more than just giving people a skill to earn a living, and it should help people to understand the world better. In the modern society, everything, such as competitions between countries, war and peace and so on, all is related to economic. A person without basic knowledge on economics may even cannot understand the behind meaning of news. For example, Tom, my closet friend, who is an electrical engineer, hasn’t taken any course on economics. More than once has Tom told me about his regret that he did pick any course about economics, because he always reading newspapers but cannot understand the proper nouns and cannot figure out what the news talking about.

Second, having a command of knowledge on economics helps people to make a good use of their property. To be more specific, with knowledge of economics, people can analyse current economic and one’s owe finance condition. Thus, he or she can choose the suitable investment strategy. My aunt is just a excellent investor, who make choice by her own understanding. When my aunt in college, though daily homework is quite busy, she still take a course on economics without hesitation. The basic knowledge seems to be a bridge, which leads my aunts to the world of economic.

Admittedly, taking an extra course will absolutely occupies the leisure time of students. However, think about the benefits the economics course will bring. Isn’t it worthwhile to sacrifice some time to acquire the useful knowledge? Anyway, for high school students, learning knowledge is the top task.

To sum up, it already seems to be self-evident that college student should to sign up an economics course, as it help people to understand the world better, and make a wiser investment strategy.

qianjun06

6月26日100206 NA Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? High school students should take a course on basic economics.  批改蓝色好句子


Have you ever be thinking about what the meaning of high school education? Have you ever been in a dilemma whether to take a course on basic economics? Nowadays, as the world is full of economic news, no one can deny that economic has been one of the hottest topics all around the world. Thus, to the question whether college students should choose a course on basic economics, my answer is definitely yes.   提问式的开头写的真流畅

First of all, high school education means more than just giving people a skill to earn a living, and it should help people to understand the world better. In the modern society, everything, such as competitions between countries, war and peace and so on, all is related to economic. A person without basic knowledge on economics may even cannot understand the behind meaning of news. For example, Tom, my closet friend, who is an electrical engineer, hasn’t taken any course on economics. More than once has Tom told me about his regret that he did pick any course about economics, because he always reading newspapers but cannot understand the proper nouns and cannot figure out what the news talking about.

Second, having a command of knowledge on economics helps people to make a good use of their property. To be more specific, with knowledge of economics, people can analyse current economic and one’s owe finance condition. Thus, he or she can choose the suitable investment strategy. My aunt is just a excellent investor, who make choice by her own understanding. When my aunt in college, though daily homework is quite busy, she still take a course on economics without hesitation. The basic knowledge seems to be a bridge, which leads my aunts to the world of economic.

Admittedly, taking an extra course will absolutely occupies the leisure time of students. However, think about the benefits the economics course will bring. Isn’t it worthwhile to sacrifice some time to acquire the useful knowledge? Anyway, for high school students, learning knowledge is the top task.

To sum up, it already seems to be self-evident that college student should to sign up an economics course, as it help people to understand the world better, and make a wiser investment strategy.

文章虽然不花俏，但是就是很顺，文字表达很通顺，而且variable，文底真心好啊MOre than 那句后面的he did pick any course about economics是虚拟用法吗？

瓜瓜不瓜

6月27日101009NA Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Compared with people who live in cities, people who live in rural areas can take better care of their families.

The last several years have witness a huge change of society. Under urbanization process, more and more people moves from rural areas to cities. However, is there really so many merits to living in the cities? Some critics hold the opinion that people living in rural areas can take better care of their families. I, personally, do not agree their contention.

To begin with, facilities, especially health care system, are much more advanced in cities than rural areas. With strong supports of technology and capital, family members can be well treated once he or she is ill. However, partly due to poverty, the hospital facilities in rural areas are always not that abundant and advanced as cities. Take my aunt, Jessica, who lived in countryside for example. Last year, Jessica caught a strange headache, but when she went to local hospital, the doctor told her that there was nothing wrong. Jessica went back home, but the headache got worse and worse. After a month, Jessica cannot stand the pain and went to a hospital in cities. To everyone’s supervise, after CT scan, the doctor found that there was a tumour in her brain. Fortunately, it was not too late. Had the tumour excised in the city hospital, Jessica become well again. There is no doubt family members can get better hospital treatment in cities.

In addition, various entertainment places give people a lot of choice to spend time with families, which is helpful to strengthen the relation between families. Especially of the old, they will not felt lonely, and families getting-together avoid the old feel depressed. Nowadays, it is quite common to see news that the old die because of loneliness and depression. Those so-called empty-nest elders often live in rural areas, and their children already move to cities. Because of long distance, their children cannot go home often. Thus, it is self-evident that empty-nest elders get no care from their children, and they are more inclined to become depressed.

Admittedly, in cities, people are busier at work, which may squeeze the time to spend with families. However, modern transportation systems largely shorten the distance and save the time. With the help of cars, trains, and plains, families in cities, even in different cities, can get together easily. On the contrary, such convenient transportation seems to be impossible in rural areas.

In summary, with the above-mentioned reason, I, definitely stand for the opinion that people living in cities can take better care of families than those living in rural areas.