- UID
- 551106
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2010-7-29
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
探险者 5.2 作业 综合/独立
探险者 5.2 作业 综合/独立 5月2日20110820 NA Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The most important investment for a company is to spend money on improving skills of its employees.
Some individuals indicate that technology not only provides modern people with more options, but complicates our lives as well. Therefore, people are always puzzled by the refreshed terminology and the new explanations for that, making it necessary for people's grasp and sensitive to the fast-moving society. Also, different attractions and people's natural desire lead to our expectation for a high-quality life. Clearly, it is desperately needed that company has to spend money on improving skills of its employees, which plays the most vital role in its expenditure.
Undoubtedly, managers of every company worry about whether their investment can pay off both intellectually and emotionally, which means the improvement of staff's working efficiency and the solidarity of their groups. For one thing, it is the training that lays a solid foundation for staff's well-rounded abilities, which ranges from how to appropriately optimize your work time and information resource to how to incorporate what you have learned from textbook to practice. For another, without interpersonal and communication skills, people may suffer adversities like the shortage of target clients and the isolation from the majority. The progression of your socialized skills will not only help you get along with your colleagues, but give rise to the opportunity to express yourself in public as well. Consequently, it is unlikely that the company won't make great success with such excellent employees.
Aside from promoting people to be welfare, it is not uncommon that modern companies focus much attention on one’s expanded outlook. Obviously, employees are not passive receptacles of predigested plans, thus predominant staff is encouraged to positively participate in thinking up constructive ideas. The communication between leaders and employees in the modern society is commonplace, making it available to enhance employees’ abilities to keep informed of the up-to-date resource and techniques. More importantly, people who have durable eyesight are entitled with the capacity of creativity. Even though no one thought highly of Steve Jobs's long-term suggestion during his early period, he stick to the research of computer devices and the masses' feedback, bringing about the appearance of fantastic iphone and the popularity of the Apple. It is evident that Steve Jobs made such perfect prediction with his accumulated experience and learning from daily occupation, which is closely connected with people’s practical ability.
Another fundamental reason that I'm in favor of the statement is that people are now suffering recurring psychological stress, which discourages their working enthusiasm. That would certainly cause great loss of the company's investment, since their expenditures receive little as their expectation. Clearly, people are born with the natural desire for satisfied living condition, thus making them purchase commodities which match to their social status. Therefore, skill training will make them content by promoting their career prospective and wages, which enable them to lead a better life. In addition, company has to invest in people's mental and physical health recovery. Employees have to be taught how to involve in daily exercises, how to keep calm when in face of difficulties and how to relieve themselves from high pressure due to everyday work, which we call psychology guidance.
Overall, on the one hand, the improvement of staff's skills will benefit both his\her own career path and working group; on the other hand, with developed job satisfaction, people will more positively devote themselves to their undertaking with remarkable enthusiasm and energy. It is no wonder that the most significant investment for a company is to practice their employees' abilities, which leads to the promotion of the company itself and its staff.
TPO3
The reading passage explores that the painting is not attributed to Rembrandt. In contrast, even though the instructor in the listening admits the exploration in the reading is true, the paint has been examined by researchers to be Rembrandt's. And she gives three points to support her ideas.
First of all, the author of the reading analyzes that the dressing way of the woman is inconsistent, which is not in harmony with the style of Rembrandt. However, the lecturer opposes that viewpoint because the collar was added over the top of the original paint 100 hundred years after the work had been made, which can be indicated by the pigment. The reason for adding a collar is to improve the painting's value by making some change of the woman.
Additionally, the reading reckons that Rembrandt never made such an error of light and shadow. But according what has been expressed by the lecturer, if you move the collar, the original painting will be seen. Actually, on the original panel, the light color of the simple collar will reflect the light to illuminate the woman's face, which indicates that the face won't be partially shadowed. That is parallel with Rembrandt's realistic style.
Finally, she contradicts the reading with the standpoint that the panel will be enlarged when the collar is added, making the work to be more grand and valuable. Indeed, the original single piece of wood is absolutely Rembrandt's paint.(漏掉了另外一个原因,细节啊)
TPO3
The reading passage explores that the painting is not attributed to Rembrandt. In contrast, even though the instructor in the listening admits the exploration in the reading is true, the paint has been examined by researchers to be Rembrandt's. And she gives three points to support her ideas.
First of all, the author of the reading analyzes that the dressing way of the woman is inconsistent, which is not in harmony with the style of Rembrandt. However, the lecturer opposes that viewpoint because the collar was added over the top of the original paint 100 hundred years after the work had been made, which can be indicated by the pigment. The reason for adding a collar is to improve the painting's value by making some change of the woman.
Additionally, the reading reckons that Rembrandt never made such an error of light and shadow. But according what has been expressed by the lecturer, if you move the collar, the original painting will be seen. Actually, on the original panel, the light color of the simple collar will reflect the light to illuminate the woman's face, which indicates that the face won't be partially shadowed. That is parallel with Rembrandt's realistic style.
Finally, she contradicts the reading with the standpoint that the panel will be enlarged when the collar is added, making the work to be more grand and valuable. Indeed, the original single piece of wood is absolutely Rembrandt's paint.(漏掉了另外一个原因,细节啊)
|
|