Financial Times 公布 2012 全球MBA最新排名

steven

Methodology:
http://forum.chasedream.com/North_American_MBA/thread-650176-1-1.html

斯坦福大学商学院(Stanford Graduate School of Business)凭借其毕业生的赚钱能力，首次荣登英国《金融时报》全球商学院排名的榜首。

位于加州帕罗奥多的斯坦福商学院，击败了2011年的并列冠军——伦敦商学院(London Business School)和宾夕法尼亚大学沃顿商学院(Wharton business school)，夺得了今年的冠军头衔。

斯坦福商学院今年实现了重大突破，成为英国《金融时报》年度商学院排名自1999年创立以来的第四家冠军院校。

英国《金融时报》商学院排名的编纂涉及20个不同类别的数据，包括学校的国际前景、研究和思想成果、排名前100的全日制MBA项目毕业生的成就。在毕业三年后的平均工资这个类别上，斯坦福大学商学院的优势越来越明显，且据校友报道，该院MBA毕业生平均薪资过去6年来都是最高的。

今年斯坦福大学的毕业生平均工资（根据近3年数据编纂）为19.1657万美元，比第二名哈佛大学商学院高出近1.4万美元。哈佛大学商学院曾在1999和2000年两度获得英国《金融时报》商学院排名冠军。斯坦福大学商学院取代前任冠军伦敦商学院（今年排名下降至第三名）登上冠军宝座，反映了今年的一个普遍趋势——美国的商学院相对欧洲的商学院重新占据了优势。2011和2012年两度上榜的47家美国商学院中，有20家排名上升。而前两年连续上榜的23家欧洲商学院中，只有5家排名上升。特别是，在毕业生毕业三年后的平均工资方面，上榜的23家欧洲商学院中，有16家2012年的数据比上年有所下降。

英国《金融时报》 德拉?布拉德肖 报道

steven

Rank in 2012	Rank in 2011	Rank in 2010	3y avg	School name	Country
1	4	4	3	Stanford Graduate School of Business	US
2	3	3	3	Harvard Business School	US
3	1	2	2	University of Pennsylvania: Wharton	US
4	1	1	2	London Business School	UK
5	7	6	6	Columbia Business School	US
6	4	5	5	Insead	France / Singapore
7	9	8	8	MIT: Sloan	US
8	8	6	7	IE Business School	Spain
9	9	11	10	Iese Business School	Spain
10	6	9	8	Hong Kong UST Business School	China
11	11	-	-	Indian Institute of Management, Ahmedabad (IIMA)	India
12	12	9	11	University of Chicago: Booth	US
13	14	15	14	IMD	Switzerland
14	25	28	22	University of California at Berkeley: Haas	US
15	20	20	18	Duke University: Fuqua	US
16	21	22	20	Northwestern University: Kellogg	US
17	15	13	15	New York University: Stern	US
18	18	18	18	HEC Paris	France
19	18	13	17	Dartmouth College: Tuck	US
20	13	12	15	Indian School of Business	India
20	15	16	17	Yale School of Management	US
20	27	16	21	University of Oxford: Sa?d	UK
23	23	-	-	National University of Singapore School of Business	Singapore
24	17	22	21	Ceibs	China
24	30	36	30	Cornell University: Johnson	US
26	26	21	24	University of Cambridge: Judge	UK
27	58	42	42	Warwick Business School	UK
28	-	28	-	Chinese University of Hong Kong	China
29	24	28	27	University of Michigan: Ross	US
30	36	25	30	Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University	Netherlands
31	29	40	33	Manchester Business School	UK
32	31	33	32	UCLA: Anderson	US
33	21	19	24	Esade Business School	Spain
34	33	27	31	Nanyang Business School	Singapore
35	41	34	37	Carnegie Mellon: Tepper	US
36	34	26	32	Cranfield School of Management	UK
37				University of Hong Kong	China
38	41	31	37	University of Virginia: Darden	US
38	32	41	37	City University: Cass	UK
40	38	34	37	Emory University: Goizueta	US
41	35	36	37	Australian School of Business: AGSM	Australia
42	28	38	36	SDA Bocconi	Italy
43	38	38	40	Georgetown University: McDonough	US
44	46	45	45	University of Toronto: Rotman	Canada
45	44	44	44	Rice University: Jones	US
46	37	32	38	Imperial College Business School	UK
46	53	63	54	Melbourne Business School	Australia
46	73	57	59	Indiana University: Kelley	US
49	59			Pennsylvania State University: Smeal	US
49	52	48	50	University of Rochester: Simon	US
51	-	65	-	Coppead	Brazil
51	44	54	50	Texas A & M University: Mays	US
51	49	52	51	University of Texas at Austin: McCombs	US
54	-	-	-	Peking University: Guanghua	China
54	60	89	68	University of Cape Town GSB	South Africa
56	62	46	55	University of North Carolina: Kenan-Flagler	US
57	46	52	52	University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign	US
58	40	43	47	University of Maryland: Smith	US
59	49	54	54	York University: Schulich	Canada
59	74	54	62	Purdue University: Krannert	US
61	-	49	-	Washington University: Olin	US
61	51	57	56	Vanderbilt University: Owen	US
61	64	57	61	University of Southern California: Marshall	US
61	57	95	71	McGill University: Desautels	Canada
65	61	94	73	Hult International Business School	US / UK / UAE / China
66				Sungkyunkwan University SKK GSB	South Korea
66	72	67	68	Ohio State University: Fisher	US
68	46	49	54	University of Western Ontario: Ivey	Canada
69	74	47	63	Boston College: Carroll	US
70	55	87	71	Vlerick Leuven Gent Management School	Belgium
71	41	24	45	Lancaster University Management School	UK
72	-	75	-	University of Minnesota: Carlson	US
73	86	78	79	University of Washington: Foster	US
74	97	-	-	Georgia Institute of Technology	US
74	63	67	68	Wisconsin School of Business	US
76	77	-	-	Incae Business School	Costa Rica
77	-	65	-	Michigan State University: Broad	US
77	68	61	69	Boston University School of Management	US
79		57		George Washington University	US
80	78	79	79	Wake Forest University: Babcock	US
81	53	72	69	University of California at Irvine: Merage	US
82	80	82	81	University of British Columbia: Sauder	Canada
83	-	-	-	University of Pittsburgh: Katz	US
83	88	89	87	University of Edinburgh Business School	UK
85	80	71	79	University of Notre Dame: Mendoza	US
86				Northeastern University	US
86	68	75	76	Birmingham Business School	UK
86	78	98	87	University College Dublin: Smurfit	Ireland
89	68	67	75	Thunderbird School of Global Management	US
90	64	64	73	University of Iowa: Tippie	US
91	-	73	-	Aston Business School	UK
91	68	-	-	SP Jain Center of Management	Dubai / Singapore
93	-	-	-	Universit?t St.Gallen	Switzerland
94	55	74	74	Durham Business School	UK
95	80	67	81	University of South Carolina: Moore	US
95	64	93	84	Ipade	Mexico
95	90	89	91	Bradford University School of Management	UK
98	91	83	91	Brigham Young University: Marriott	US
98	88	96	94	SMU: Cox	US
100	84	99	94	Babson College: Olin	US

dreamdreamy

什么水排名。。

carbonzju

我们都去印度读MBA吧，看那薪酬数字。。赤裸裸地恐怖呀

steven

Methodology


This Ft ranking aims to give athorough assessment of Mbaprogrammes worldwide througha survey of business schools and alumni.


To participate, schools must meetstrict criteria. Most notably, schoolsmust be internationally accredited andthe programme must have run for atleast four consecutive years. this year,150 business schools took part.


Two online surveys are used tocollect the required data. the first iscompleted by the schools, and thesecond by alumni who graduated in2008. For schools to be eligible, a20 per cent response rate is requiredfrom alumni, with a minimum of 20responses. this year, a total of 9,466responses were submitted by alumni,44 per cent of graduates contacted.


Data from alumni questionnaires areused to compile eight of the 20 criteriathat determine the ranking. together,these carry 59 per cent of the ranking’sweight. Published figures for thesecriteria include information collated bythe Ft over three years where available.Data gathered from the 2012 Mbasurvey carries 50 per cent of the totalweight, and those from the 2011 and2010 rankings account for 25 per centeach. except for salary data, if only twoyears of data are available, the weightingis split 60:40 if data are from 2012and 2011, or 70:30 if from 2012 and2010. For salary data, the weighting is50:50 for two years’ data, to negate anyinflation-related distortions. “Value formoney” is based on 2012 figures only.


The first two ranking criteria examinethe difference in alumni salariesfrom the start of their Mbas to the presenttime. the salaries of alumni in thenon-profit and public service sectors,and those in full-time education, areremoved. Purchasing power parity ratessupplied by the International MonetaryFund are used to convert the remainingdata to Us$ PPP equivalent figures,to allow for differences in purchasingpower between countries.


Following this conversion, the meanaverage “current salary” is calculatedfor each school and weighted, for largerschools, to reflect variations betweensectors. the resulting figure, “weightedsalary”, carries 20 per cent of the ranking’sweight. the “salary increase”, alsoaccounting for 20 per cent, is calculatedfor each school according to thedifference in average alumni salarybefore the Mba to the present time,three years after graduation – a periodof typically four to five years. half ofthis figure is calculated according tothe absolute salary increase, and halfaccording to the percentage increaserelative to pre-Mba salaries.


Eleven criteria, collectively accountingfor 31 per cent of the final rank,are based on data from school questionnaires.these criteria includethe diversity of teaching staff, boardmembers and Mba students, accordingto gender and nationality, and theinternational reach of the programme.For gender-related criteria, schools thathave a 50:50 (male: female) compositionreceive the highest possible score.


The table’s final criterion, “Ftresearch rank”, is calculated accordingto the relative number of articlespublished by schools’ full-time facultymembers in 45 internationally recognisedacademic and practitionerjournals. the rank combines the absolutenumber of publications, betweenJanuary 2009 and october 2011, withthe number of publications, weightedrelative to the faculty’s size.


Following calculations for each criteria,an Ft score is calculated for eachschool. First, a Z-score – a mathematicalformula that creates numbers reflectingthe range of the points – is calculatedfor each of the measures. these scoresare then weighted and added together,giving a final total from which theschools are ranked in descending orderto compose the Ft’s Global Mba Ranking2012. – Adam Palin


Judith Pizer of Jeff Head Associates actedas the FT’s database consultant. The FTresearch rank was calculated using theScopus database of research literature.

ballackahn

好像说这个排名的薪酬是按购买力的、、、

JASO

PKU！！

DzHXS

西班牙、印度军团来势汹汹。

TTK

好像说这个排名的薪酬是按购买力的、、、

-- by 会员 ballackahn (2012/1/30 14:58:25)

怎么说?

sataharu

WUSTL怎么排到60+了？