- UID
- 829703
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2012-11-13
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
118. Thefollowing appeared as part of an article in a business magazine. "Arecent study rating 300 male and female advertising executives according to theaverage number of hours they sleep per night showed an association between theamount of sleep the executives need and the success of their firms. Of theadvertising firms studied those whose executives reported needing no more thansix hours of sleep per night had higher profit margins and faster growth. Onthe basis of this study, we recommend that businesses hire only people who needless than six hours of sleep per night." Write aresponse in which you discuss what questions would need to be answered in orderto decide whether the recommendation and the argument on which it is based arereasonable. Be sure to explain how the answers to these questions would help toevaluate the recommendation. The authorrecommends that business should hire only people who need less than six hoursof sleep per night. To support it, the author cites the survey of the time theyneed per night, covering 300 female and male advertising executives. the surveyshows that those whose executives reported needing no more than six hours ofsleep per night had higher profit margins and faster growth. However, thisargument if rife with holes and assumptions, and thus it cannot convince me. Relying on the survey of 300 male and femaleadvertising executives, the author concludes the relationship between success ofa company and sleeping hours. It’s unfair to let 300 advertising executivesrepresent all people in all fields. What’s more the scope of the survey is sosmall that we can’t draw a firm conclusion based on it. Perhaps advertising isa hard job which cost a lot of time to accomplish it perfectly. Also, it ispossible that those 300 executives are more diligent and prefer to spend lesstime sleeping. The author has failed to consider these possibilities intoconsideration, thus the conclusion is unconvincing. Secondly, the author unfairly equals higherprofits and faster growth with less than six hours sleeping. A person havinghigher profit margins and faster growth depends on several factors. For example,whether he can finish the job efficiently or how well he can solve the job orhow creative he is. And the author overlooks the significance of the decisionof a leader, and the role of rivals. Of course, the success of a business alsohas something with fortune. If you are lucky, chance to be successful may behigher. Thus evidence is absent that the time of sleeping contributes to thehigher profits and faster growth. Even though the assumption that is right thatneeding less than six hours sleeping benefits the profits and growth, ofcourse, which is unsubstantiated. The recommends of hiring people needing lessthan six hours sleeping is questionable. But for it may be limited in theadvertising fields, the manager’s standards of hiring vary from person toperson. For instance, the manager prefers the employees with the ability ofcreating, cooperating and so on. If the person likes sleeping more but has otherextraordinary skills that is needed most in the job, will you let him go? Thus,the sleeping time cannot be the only judgments of hiring. To sum up, the suggestion is not wellsupported. To strength the argument, the author has to enlarge the scale of thesurvey, which covers different people from different fields. To evaluate theargument, the author has to provide more evidence to support the conclusionthat need of sleeping time has direct relations with higher profits and fastergrowth. |
|