ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1793|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[issue] ISSUE8 球拍,谢啦~~

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2013-1-15 15:02:27 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
8. Claim: Inany field—business, politics, education, government—those in power should stepdown after five years.
Reason: Thesurest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through newleadership.

 Shouldofficeholders be able to stay in office as long as they can gain the vote ofthe majority, or should they be subject to term limits, preventing them fromserving beyond certain amount of time?  Theissue reflects people’s concern that a person or a group who have too muchinfluence for too long may abuse the right and use the power for the good of afew people rather than being fair to all. This may stuck the path to successfor there is no revitalization through leadership.
  It’snot wrong that setting term limits will encourage the development of the new leadership;nevertheless, we have no reason to deny the effect of long term leadership insome fields for their abundant experience at the same time.
  Themain purpose of term limit is to refresh the organization, to bring in newideas. So people want to provide opportunities for the young, active members toreinforce and revitalize the organizations. All organizations have a problemwith the infusion of the new leadership. This applies to business, government, academia,military and labor unions. It’s important to have experienced people inposition of responsibilities, but it is essential that youngpeople are introduced to the challenges of leadership and the technique of thegovernance. After all they are our future. This is not an effort to get oldermembers step down, because we still need their experience.
  Meanwhile,the tenure has been the key guarantor for academia freedom. The assumption thatin order for academic freedom to be protected, a structure is needed thatensured that neither the internal and external inference could influence thework of ideas so that they are able to feel free to speak, write and criticizewithout inference.
  Ofcourse, when I emphasize the importance of term limit, I never want to deny orbelittle the significance of long term leadership. For some fields, such as in familybusiness, some organizations with small scale, executive directors and topleaders will be in position for decades. So they are called ‘growth leader’ wholaid the foundation of the group. For one thing, they spend much of their time;some of even whole life, cultivating relationships, if a leader leaves,administrative skills and wisdom are also gone.
 What’smore, one five-year of leadership may be too short for a person to realize hisambition. Taking leadership in a company as example, the new leader may have tospend one year knowing the condition, and some time making a specific plan. If thetime is excluded when he in the last state of tenure, during which most peoplemay not be so energetic to manage the company, the rest time is too short to executea good plan. How can he manage the company well?
 To betterbalance the relationship between tenure and revitalization, we should see themwisely, not too partially. In the field which experience matters more, we canlet the tenure longer, to let the leader have enough time to realize his plan. Whilein the field which new idea plays an important role, we should limit the tenureharder, to provide more chance for the young people.
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2013-1-15 18:50:20 | 只看该作者
对这种claim and reason的题目,不要笼统地写,最好能分别对reason和claim进行分析,你觉得理由是否合理?理由是否就能得到结论,结论是不是对的等。
板凳
发表于 2013-1-16 09:37:08 | 只看该作者
. While in the field which new idea plays an important role, we should limit the tenureharder, to provide more chance for the young people.

while前面是不是应该是分号?
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-4-18 01:30
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部