ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1989|回复: 5
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[作文互改] Issue7 求拍 求打分

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2012-12-8 19:50:44 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people. Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts.



Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.



There is no doubt that the government funding of arts can ensue the arts flourish and be available to all the people. And to preserve the integrity of the arts government should not overly interfere in them. Not only the government should funding the arts and make them be available to all the people, but also ensure the integrity of the arts.



As we know, art is one way to express the culture of a nation. We found that many pieces of artists represent temporary culture of a country in history. These successes always need not only the talent, perspiration of the artist, but also owe to the financial supporting. So in many circumstances financial supporting plays important role in art success. As the consequence of the combination of politics and church, arts of religion flourished by the supporting of government in medieval. New churches stood up and frescoes painted. Later, the fashion of Renaissanceprevailed all the Europe. Government’s funding made this happened. As we said, government funding is very important to make arts flourish.



Without the supporting of government many artists can not show their talent, or even after finished a master piece it can not be known by people just because lack of money. Unfortunately, some famous artists like Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart died in a very young age because of the poor living condition. Such gifted artist can not compose more master pieces for the people of all over the world. Given that they don't have these financial issue they may present more arts to us today. Moreover, the funding of government can also improve public cultural accomplishment by holding free arts exhibitions. Though many people like arts, they would not go to some museum because the expensive ticket. So many arts are not available to the people who can not afford the ticket.



Another issue should be concerned is in most time government have very good influence on arts. To a certain degree government also should take responsible for inhibiting the developing of arts by excessive intervention. Archbishop abuse their power which made artists suffering mental and physical pain that artists can not focus on the arts. On the other hand, some arts often lost or destroyed during the war. Government should take some measures to ensure the integrity of arts when the arts confront the disaster. Although many arts have been created, it may also can represent its value because they lose the integrity of themselves. So if people want to ensure the value of the arts government should have plans to protect them from being destroyed.



For these reasons, the government should fund of arts to ensure they can be available to all people, also the government should take measures to ensure the integrity of the arts in the meantime.
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2012-12-9 06:52:06 | 只看该作者
the government should fund of arts to ensure they can be available to all people,

fund of 是动词?
板凳
发表于 2012-12-9 20:09:11 | 只看该作者
There is no doubt that the government funding of arts canensue the arts flourish and be available to all the people. And to preserve theintegrity of the arts government should not overly interfere in them. Not only thegovernment should前面需要调换下顺序,not noly ……but also 前后接的是并列成分 fund the arts andmake them be available to all the people, but also ensure the integrity of thearts.

Aswe know, art is one way to express the culture of a nation. We found that manypieces of artists represent temporary culture of a country in history. Thesesuccesses always need not only the talent, perspiration of the artist, but alsoowe to the financial supporting. So in many circumstances financial supportingplays important role in art success. As the consequence of the combination ofpolitics and church, arts of religion flourished by the supporting ofgovernment in medieval. New churches stood up and frescoes painted. Later, thefashion of Renaissance prevailed all the Europe.Government’s funding made this happened. As we said, government funding is veryimportant to make arts flourish.
这里最好能举例子说,并且能具体说下,艺术是怎么受益的,也就是说政府的资助是怎么执行的起作用的,否则显得太过宽泛无物。

Withoutthe supporting of government many artists can not show their talent, or evenafter finished a master piece it can not be known by people just because of lack ofmoney. Unfortunately, some famous artists like Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart died ina very young age because of the poor living condition. Such gifted artist cannot compose more master pieces for the people of all over the world. Given thatthey don't have these financial issue they may present more arts to us today.Moreover, the funding of government can also improve public culturalaccomplishment by holding free arts exhibitions. Though many people like arts,they would not go to some museum because the expensive ticket. So many arts arenot available to the people who can not afford the ticket.

Anotherissue should be concerned is in most time government have very good influenceon arts. To a certain degree government also should take responsible forinhibiting the developing of arts by excessive intervention. Archbishop abusetheir power which made artists suffering mental and physical pain that artistscan not focus on the arts. On the other hand, some arts often lost or destroyedduring the war. Government should take some measures to ensure the integrity ofarts when the arts confront the disaster. Although many arts have been created,it may also can represent its value because they lose the integrity ofthemselves. So if people want to ensure the value of the arts government shouldhave plans to protect them from being destroyed.
你把艺术的完整性理解错了,艺术的完整性更多的是思想艺术方面的东西,而非形式上的东西,比如一部揭露显示丑恶的电影,由于政府的介入,使得失去了本来的表现意义。
For these reasons, thegovernment should fund of arts to ensure they can be available to all people,also the government should take measures to ensure the integrity of the arts inthe meantime.
地板
 楼主| 发表于 2012-12-9 20:17:03 | 只看该作者
建议不错,我回去再想想,对于issue如果想不到实在的例子怎么办,考场上怎么应对?
5#
发表于 2012-12-9 20:32:04 | 只看该作者
建议不错,我回去再想想,对于issue如果想不到实在的例子怎么办,考场上怎么应对?
-- by 会员 gloryming (2012/12/9 20:17:03)

编,尽可能具体的例子,就像我们自己说法打比方一样,大的比方不一定是存在的,但却是合理的就行
6#
 楼主| 发表于 2012-12-9 20:52:11 | 只看该作者
建议不错,我回去再想想,对于issue如果想不到实在的例子怎么办,考场上怎么应对?
-- by 会员 gloryming (2012/12/9 20:17:03)


编,尽可能具体的例子,就像我们自己说法打比方一样,大的比方不一定是存在的,但却是合理的就行
-- by 会员 竹林中人 (2012/12/9 20:32:04)


好的,知道了。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-1-31 06:43
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部