5月４日下午场，记得的几道题

ytwxh

今天下午刚刚考完，分数实在是太低，就不报了，题也只记得几道了，拿出来分享一下，希望能帮到五月考试的其他人．
1.ＡＩ作文的题目不太理解，所以看了很久，记得比较清楚，应该是这样说的：People are likely to accept as a leader only someone who has demonstrated an ability to perform the same tasks that he or she expects to others to perform it.
2.AA作文是说委内瑞拉的经济学家给总统写了封信，信的内容是说由于工业发展使得委内瑞拉的环境受到污染，所以中心公园的旅游收入已经连续降低了五年。不过幸运的是在国内的一些公园内发现了大量的煤炭。所以经济学家们建议同意煤炭公司去开采，这样煤炭公司一定会贡献大量的税收并给原来在旅游业工作的人提供大量的工作岗位。所以说政府应该同意开采，否则旅游业也只会持续下降。
3.阅读有一个是说俄罗斯妇女解放的问题的．还有一个是一个人对之前一个人认为妇女发明了一种容器的看法的反驳．详细的实在是记不得了，不好意思．
4．高中时没学过概率，结果今天就悲剧了．印象最深的是道这样的题：有个公司要安两个tracking system, T1和Ｔ２。这两个系统的密码都是由６个字符构成。Ｔ１要求有２个数字（从０～９中选）和４个字母（由Ａ～Ｚ，但不包括ＡＥＩＯＵ和Ｙ），Ｔ２要求有４个数字（要求同Ｔ１）和２个字母（要求同Ｔ１）构成．问题好象是问Ｔ１密码中的数字跟Ｔ２密码有相同的数字的概率是多少．
还有一个也是概率的题，大体是这样的：有两个袋子Ｘ和Ｙ，袋子Ｘ是空的，袋子Ｙ里有若干个红球和绿球．随机从Ｙ中拿一个球到Ｘ后再随机从Ｙ中拿一个到Ｘ，如果第二个被拿过去的球是绿色的几率是４８／１４５，问两个球都是绿色的概率是多少．下面的两个条件是：Ａ．第一个被拿过去的球是绿的的概率是１／５．Ｂ．红色的球有２４个（好象是，记不清了）．
还有一个题比较简单但没来得及做：一个学校有吉他小提琴和钢琴的兴趣班，学吉他的1/4,学钢琴的1/6, 学小提琴的1/8，三个班都没去的学生有１４３个，问学吉他的比学小提琴的多多少人．

虽然是才考的，可是记得的就这么多了，希望对大家会有帮助，祝大家考出好成绩哈～～～

Yuke1212

谢谢楼主分享~！

星星711

谢谢lz~~

泾渭不凡

thx~~~

Nikki纸巾

如果真像楼主说的那样，这篇AI不是考古么？AWA224范文里的题目，第33篇
33. “People are likely to accept as a leader only someone who has demonstrated an ability to perform the same tasks that he or she expects others to perform.”
Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the opinion stated above. Support your views with reasons and/or examples from your own experience, observations, or reading.
People are more likely to accept the leadership of those who have shown they can perform the same tasks they require of others. My reasons for this view involve the notions of respect and trust.
It is difficult for people to fully respect a leader who cannot, or will not, do what he or she asks of others. President Clinton’s difficulty in his role as Commander-in-Chief serves as a fitting and very public example. When Clinton assumed this leadership position, it was well known that he had evaded military service during the Vietnam conflict. Military leaders and lower-level personnel alike made it clear that they did not respect his leadership as a result. Contrast the Clinton case with that of a business leader such as John Chambers, CEO of Cisco Systems, who by way of his training and experience as a computer engineer earned the respect of his employees.
It is likewise difficult to trust leaders who do not have experience in the areas under their leadership. The Clinton example illustrates this point as well. Because President Clinton lacked military experience, people in the armed forces found it difficult to trust that his policies would reflect any understanding of their interests or needs. And when put to the test, he undermined their trust to an even greater extent with his naive and largely bungled attempt to solve the problem of gays in the military. In stark contrast, President Dwight Eisenhower inspired nearly devotional trust as well as respect because of his role as a military hero in World War II.
In conclusion, it will always be difficult for people to accept leaders who lack demonstrated ability in the areas under their leadership. Initially, such leaders will be regarded as outsiders, and treated accordingly. Moreover, some may never achieve the insider status that inspires respect and trust from those they hope to lead.

yaoqiyancoco

楼主威武。。。

谷雨Molly

谢谢楼主

棋梓

感谢楼主！

yuliu1

THS!!!!!

泾渭不凡

~~~~~