一战悲剧，放狗回馈CD

zhaoshuairuc

49+20
Q
数学基本失忆，本来觉得就一道题拿不准，后来发现悲剧，估计细心和状态不够。有几道鸡精的变体。失忆中。。。。

V
开始做的节奏还行，做到12、3题 出了逻辑jj里面那个GWD的BF原题（此时大喜），做到25道左右，第三篇阅读出现水的政策那篇，居然有6道题。。。做完之后就知道悲剧了，之后的SC和CR瞬间变简单并且pace一下被打乱了。下面我尽量回忆一下。。。（年纪大了，记忆力退化）

第一篇阅读是 JJ里面没有的 半页多 两段 讲的关于广告效用的文章

第一段讲 有俩人ML和摩尔(Moore），对广告进行了分析，其中ML有一个观点，Moore有俩观点。

第二段 作者对 楼上两人的观点代入实际进行了一番说明。

题目有作者分别同意不同意这俩人（共3观点），选项有同意ML的 同意摩尔的1观点 之类的
还有个高亮失忆中。。。 在第一段

第二篇阅读 是 jj里面的那个H人的
题目基本jj里面都说了。
有道类似托福阅读选同义词的似乎（狗主表示4个词没一个认识的）

第三篇阅读是悲剧的开始，
水权那个题，开篇和OG里面的那篇有点类似，大概从第10行到50行，全是排比+递进的疑问句，提出了N多的质疑。。。。考试时注意每个问题的逻辑递进关系（有题）。。。。

大概这篇有6道题，基本全是推理。。。。那是相当恶心啊。。。。全是各种质疑

第四篇是二战对女人工作影响那篇，和jj一样。

逻辑;
就记得个GWD原题的BF，其他基本失忆了。。。。。。

reneegreen

楼主是不是因为前十题做的不够好 所以导致后来进入低分区了

zhaoshuairuc

感觉不是，前10题的pace和正确率都有保证觉得。

我认为是 第三篇阅读导致的崩盘 6道题 估计至少错了4个

alinalang

额？水权是那篇啊啊？肿么没印象~~

zhaoshuairuc

有个winter.v US（斜体） 那篇

skyyanforeve

LZ是运气不好。水权那个绝对是高难度阅读。且jj太少。这个GMAT有时候是看运气的。
我一站的时候没jj考到城市规划，我以为有jj会好些，结果后来看jj，所有遇到那片的人，都死得很惨。跟LZ同感，错了后，直接难度下来了。唉，也是我第二篇阅读。
所以这个考试真是看运气的。
LZ加油，下次一定考好的。
BTW， Hispanic那个jj的题目与你考的题目一样吗？

cba1234

亲, 请再回忆点语法吧. 感谢.

祝福下次人品爆发750+

周杰伦

前20题正确率很重要，宁肯牺牲点速度，剩下的尽量避免连错，其实最后4，5道题来个全错，如果前面做的还行话，基本不影响V的总体分的

XYXB

请问LZ，水权是这篇嘛？

http://forum.chasedream.com/GMAT_Math/thread-605537-1-1.html

In Winters v. United States (1908), the Supreme Court held that the right to use waters flowing through or adjacent to the Fort Berthold Indian Reservation was reserved to American Indians by the treaty establishing the reservation. Although this treaty did not mention water rights, the Court ruled that the federal government, when it created the reservation, intended to deal fairly with American Indians by preserving for them the waters without which their lands would have been useless. Later decisions, citing Winters, established that courts can find federal rights to reserve water for particular purposes if (1) the land in question lies within an enclave under exclusive federal jurisdiction, (2) the land has been formally withdrawn from federal public lands — i.e., withdrawn from the stock of federal lands available for private use under federal land use laws — and set aside or reserved, and (3) the circumstances reveal the government intended to reserve water as well as land when establishing the reservation.
      Some American Indian tribes have also established water rights through the courts based on their traditional diversion and use of certain waters prior to the United States’ acquisition of sovereignty. For example, the Rio Grande pueblos already existed when the United States acquired sovereignty over New Mexico in 1848. Although they at that time became part of the United States, the pueblo lands never formally constituted a part of federal public lands; in any event, no treaty, statute, or executive order has ever designated or withdrawn the pueblos from public lands as American Indian reservations. This fact, however, has not barred application of the Winters doctrine. What constitutes an American Indian reservation is a question of practice, not of legal definition, and the pueblos have always been treated as reservations by the United States. This pragmatic approach is buttressed by Arizona v. California (1963), wherein the Supreme Court indicated that the manner in which any type of federal reservation is created does not affect the application to it of the Winters doctrine. Therefore, the reserved water rights of Pueblo Indians have priority over other
citizens’ water rights as of 1848, the year in which pueblos must be considered to have become reservations.